Spread, Behavior, and Ecosystem Consequences of Conventional Munitions Compounds in Coastal Marine Waters

Beck, Aaron J.; Gledhill, Martha; Schlosser, Christian; Stamer, Beate; Böttcher, Claus; Sternheim, Jens; Greinert, Jens; Achterberg, Eric P.

doi:10.3389/fmars.2018.00141

REVIEW article

Front. Mar. Sci., 30 April 2018
Sec. Marine Biogeochemistry
Volume 5 - 2018 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00141

Spread, Behavior, and Ecosystem Consequences of Conventional Munitions Compounds in Coastal Marine Waters

Aaron J. Beck¹^*

Martha Gledhill¹

Christian Schlosser¹

Beate Stamer¹

Claus Böttcher²

Jens Sternheim²

Jens Greinert^1,3

Eric P. Achterberg^1,3

¹GEOMAR - Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany
²Ministerium für Energiewende, Landwirtschaft, Umwelt, Natur und Digitalisierung des Landes Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
³Christian-Albrechts University Kiel, Institute of Geosciences, Ludewig-Meyn-Str, Kiel, Germany

Coastal marine environments are contaminated globally with a vast quantity of unexploded ordnance and munitions from intentional disposal. These munitions contain organic explosive compounds as well as a variety of metals, and represent point sources of chemical pollution to marine waters. Most underwater munitions originate from World Wars at the beginning of the twentieth century, and metal munitions housings have been impacted by extensive corrosion over the course of the following decades. As a result, the risk of munitions-related contaminant release to the water column is increasing. The behavior of munitions compounds is well-characterized in terrestrial systems and groundwater, but is only poorly understood in marine systems. Organic explosive compounds, primarily nitroaromatics and nitramines, can be degraded or transformed by a variety of biotic and abiotic mechanisms. These reaction products exhibit a range in biogeochemical characteristics such as sorption by particles and sediments, and variable environmental behavior as a result. The reaction products often exhibit increased toxicity to biological receptors and geochemical controls like sorption can limit this exposure. Environmental samples typically show low concentrations of munitions compounds in water and sediments (on the order of ng/L and μg/kg, respectively), and ecological risk appears generally low. Nonetheless, recent work demonstrates the possibility of sub-lethal genetic and metabolic effects. This review evaluates the state of knowledge on the occurrence, fate, and effect of munition-related chemical contaminants in the marine environment. There remain a number of knowledge gaps that limit our understanding of munitions-related contaminant spread and effect, and the need for additional work is made all the more urgent by increasing risk of release to the environment.

Introduction

Coastal marine environments are contaminated globally with unexploded ordnance and munitions from intentional disposal (Figure 1), but their distribution and condition are not well known (Sanderson et al., 2017). Coastal waters are particularly impacted by relic munitions resulting from the two World Wars (WWI and WWII), and the German portions of the North Sea and Baltic Sea alone contain some 1.6 million metric tons of munitions (Böttcher et al., 2011). In addition to the explosion and security risk, these munitions contain cytotoxic, genotoxic, and carcinogenic chemicals associated with conventional explosives, chemical warfare agents, and munition structural components (Tornero and Hanke, 2016; Sanderson et al., 2017). There is growing interest in remediating undersea munitions due to the hazards related to dredging (Greene et al., 2009) and increasing development of offshore infrastructure associated with aquaculture, wind farms, cables, and oil or gas pipelines (Edwards, 1995; Bohne, 2012; Sanderson et al., 2014; Appleyard, 2015; Sanderson and Fauser, 2015), as well as increasing ship traffic in general. Prolonged exposure to seawater may in fact increase the sensitivity of explosive material to detonation, due to deterioration of stabilizing components, recrystallization, or reactions with e.g., corroded metal housings to form sensitive secondary compounds such as metal picrates (Pfeiffer, 2012a). In addition, many WW-era sea-dumped munitions are likely approaching a corrosion threshold, beyond which munition hulls become breached and exposure of explosive material results in dissolution of toxic chemicals into coastal waters (Bełdowski et al., 2016; Edwards et al., 2016; Silva and Chock, 2016; Jurczak and Fabisiak, 2017).

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. German mine (most likely a BM 1000 parachute mine, Wichert, 2018) on the seafloor in the Baltic Sea, weighing approximately 500 kg, with scientific diver for scale. The small gray objects in the sand near the ground mine (arrows) are likely intact, exposed pieces of explosives remaining after low-order detonation of other mines in the area (Photo: J. Ulrich).

The purpose of the current review is to evaluate the state of knowledge on the occurrence, fate, and effect of munition-related chemical contaminants in the marine environment. There is comparatively little information available specific to the marine environment, so some aspects must be drawn from what is known in terrestrial and industrial systems. One recent review provides a more general view of munition compounds in aquatic systems, with a particular focus on the toxicological aspects (Lotufo et al., 2017). The current work builds on previous literature reviews (Beddington and Kinloch, 2005; Juhasz and Naidu, 2007), with the aim of summarizing and clarifying biogeochemical processes likely to be important for munition compound transport and fate specifically in coastal marine systems.

Here we focus on the chemical constituents that typically occur in conventional munitions present in the marine environment. In particular, this includes organic explosive compounds, metalloorganic explosives, and metals used in casings and housings of munitions. The explosive compounds considered here are the nitroaromatic 2,4,6,-trinitrotoluene (TNT), and the nitramines hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX, or hexogen) and octahydro-1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetreazocine (HMX, or octogen). Some more sensitive metaloorganic compounds used as initiators for detonation of secondary explosives will also be discussed (e.g., fulminates, azides, and styphnates of mercury, lead, and silver), although their marine environmental behavior and fate is very poorly known. There are other explosive compounds used historically (e.g., tetryl and ammonium picrate), or which are more recently developed (e.g., hexanitrohexaazaisowurtzitane), but TNT, RDX, and HMX represent a major portion of munition material present in terrestrial and marine environments (US EPA, 2012).

Chemicals in Conventional Munitions Found in the Sea, and Scale of the Problem

The explosive TNT was developed in 1863 (Wilbrand, 1863), and adapted for military use in 1902 (Travis, 2015). Nitrate for use in nitrated explosives (such as TNT) and agriculture during WWI was primarily sourced from saltpeter mines in Chile. Demand for nitrate during wartime was so fundamental that industrial nitrogen fixation (Haber-Bosch process) was developed in Germany following British blockade of the Chilean mines (Erisman et al., 2008). Similarly, the high demand for toluene in explosives production led to development of industrial production methods using petroleum instead of traditional methods utilizing coal tar (Love and Pfennig, 1951). Peak global toluene production during WWII exceeded typical peace time rates by nearly two orders of magnitude (Speight, 2011). Given this scale of production, the magnitude of munitions contamination in coastal waters (Nehring, 2005; Nixon, 2009; Böttcher et al., 2011) is perhaps less surprising.

Explosives such as TNT are relatively stable, and detonation is induced by a primary explosive, or so-called initiator. The most common primary explosives in use currently are Pb styphnate and Pb azide (Oyler et al., 2015), although Hg fulminate was the predominant primary explosive used historically. During the two WWs, Hg fulminate was used to such an extent that munitions consumed as much as 15% of the global Hg production (Figure 2) (Horowitz et al., 2014). Historical use of Hg fulminate has been phased out in favor of Pb compounds (Huynh et al., 2006; Matyáš and Pachman, 2012), but there remains evidence that Hg based explosives compounds are still used and continue to enter the environment (Kyllönen et al., 2014).

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Global annual mercury consumption, annual Hg consumption for munitions, and proportion used in munitions. Mercury-based explosives show a peak in production during the period of WWI and WWII. Redrawn after Horowitz et al. (2014).

Conventional munitions also comprise a substantial quantity of other metals for driving bands, casings, and fuses, including iron, copper, aluminum, lead, and zinc (Bausinger et al., 2007; Tornero and Hanke, 2016). Callaway et al. (2011) estimated that the metal load associated with munitions dumped in the North Channel (UK) in 1949 alone was comparable to 52 years of normal anthropogenic input to the entire Irish Sea.

Global Distribution and Local Mapping

Intentional disposal of munition material (discarded munition material; DMM) in the ocean was the major disposal method for unusable or unwanted munitions until promulgation of the Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter in 1972 (Oslo Convention, and 1975 London Convention of the same name) and the US Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (Carton and Jagusiewicz, 2011). As a result, most munition dumpsites are in coastal waters of regions that were heavily involved in WW I and II, including Europe, North America, and the southwest Pacific (Figure 3). In contrast, to our knowledge, the coastal oceans surrounding South America and Africa are relatively unimpacted by relic DMM.

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. Global distribution of documented marine sites with munitions present (includes conventional weapons, chemical weapons, and UXO). Letters refer to literature references: a, MEDEA (1997) and Bohaty (2009); b, MEDEA (1997); c, Ampleman et al. (2004); d, Missiaen and Henriet (2002); e, Plunkett (2003); f, Amato et al. (2006a,b); g, Bearden (2007); h, Nixon (2009); I, HELCOM (1995); j, Brankowitz (1989); k, James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies (2017); l, Bull (2005a,b); m, US ARMY (2001); n, Godschalk and Ferreira (1998); o, Thiel (2003); p, Francis and Alama (2011); q, Royal New Zealand Navy (2015); r, Obhodas et al. (2010) and Valkovic et al. (2009); s, Nadim et al. (2008) and National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (2017); t, Landmine Action (2005); u, Porter et al. (2011); v, UNEP/MAP (2009). Note that the map resolution is coarser than the number of actual munitions dumps; for example, the OSPAR report by Nixon (2009) (letter h) contains 148 individual munitions dumpsites. (Image drawn using QGIS, with data from: The GEBCO_2014 Grid, version 20150318, Wessel and Smith, 2017).

In addition to DMM, unexploded ordnance (UXO) is present at many marine sites in the form of armed and deployed but undetonated mines, failed detonations (duds), and wrecks of ships carrying munitions (Monfils et al., 2006; Aker et al., 2012). Such UXO is more likely to be a source of metals-based primary explosives than DMM because the latter were usually not armed or fully assembled before disposal. More than 3,800 WWII-era shipwrecks are present in the East Asian-Pacific region alone (Monfils et al., 2006), many loaded with UXO, though the amount is not known. It has further been estimated that some 20–30% of ammunition fired during the two WWs failed to detonate (GICHD, 2016), suggesting a large quantity of WW-era UXO may exist in coastal marine environments.

The location and extent of marine DMM and UXO are very poorly documented, and efforts to evaluate human impacts in the ocean have noted that munitions dumpsites are one of the least well-constrained challenges (Benn et al., 2010). In some cases, even where dumping sites are known, the specificity of DMM quantities can range from number of bombs and their exact identification to “1-2 barges” of material (Brankowitz, 1989). One report stated, “It appears unlikely that a completely accurate record of US dumping activities can be reconstructed” (p. 33) (MEDEA, 1997). Chemical weapons (CW) were usually dumped in assembled munitions or in association with conventional munition explosives, and more complete reports of chemical weapons dumping are often more readily available than for conventional weapons (e.g., Plunkett, 2003, but cf. Krohn, 1994). Nonetheless, there can remain substantial uncertainty about the undersea presence of chemical munitions even where relatively good records of disposal exist (Brewer and Nakayama, 2008; Brewer et al., 2008; Wichert, 2010).

The distribution and magnitude of UXO are similarly difficult to constrain, but it represents an additional source of marine munitions from wars early in the twentieth century as well as more recent conflicts (e.g., in the Middle East). To our knowledge, there is very little public information available on the presence of UXO or DMM in the Red Sea and Persian Gulf region, but there are indications that it may be prevalent following regional wars since the 1990's (Fowler, 1993; Nadim et al., 2008; United Nations General Assembly, 2013; National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, 2017). Although records are incomplete, the map shown in Figure 3 (including reports of DMM, UXO, and CW) illustrates the global extent of munitions material in the marine environment.

An additional important consideration is actions that can lead to unencased or exposed munition material on the seafloor. Blow-in-place (BIP) methods of in situ munition disposal (e.g., Koschinski and Kock, 2009) often result in incomplete (low-order) detonation, leaving substantial quantities of the explosive material in the environment (NATO, 2010; Kalderis et al., 2011) (Figure 1). For example, numerous 250–500 kg mines were intentionally detonated underwater at one site in the Baltic Sea in 2009, but the low-order detonation of several mines left substantial quantities of intact, exposed explosive material on the seafloor [Figure 1; “Schiesswolle,” a combination of TNT, RDX, and aluminum powder (Haas and Thieme, 1996; Pfeiffer, 2009)].

Given the lack of constraint surrounding the extent and quantity of munitions disposed in the marine environment, direct inspection is often required in order to evaluate the risk. Site-specific or limited regional efforts using geophysical techniques have been successful in mapping the local distribution of munitions on the seafloor (10–1,000 m scale) (Decarlo et al., 2007; CIRIA, 2016; Czub et al., 2018). Optical imagery also produces high resolution images and can accurately identify munitions objects, but is quite limited in terms of its spatial scope (10 s of meters scale) (Shihavuddin et al., 2014). Sidescan sonar can provide particularly striking high-resolution images of submerged munitions (Frenz, 2014; Czub et al., 2018), but uncertainties in e.g., the layback (wire length, angle), limit the absolute accuracy with which objects can be geo-referenced (Samuel and Herbert, 2007; Grabowski et al., 2018). Multibeam echo sounders provide higher geospatial accuracy and have been used to supplement sidescan data to produce exceptionally high resolution images of munition-containing shipwrecks (Sæbø et al., 2015). Towed or remote/autonomously-operated vehicle-mounted magnetometers can provide supporting information by identifying metal objects on and immediately below the seafloor (Asahina et al., 2009; Schultz et al., 2016; Grabowski et al., 2018). Sub-bottom profilers identify dense objects buried in the seafloor (Chabert, 2016; Grabowski et al., 2018), but are also non-specific for munitions and may provide false positives. Multiple techniques applied in combination improve confidence in detection and identification (Missiaen and Feller, 2008). Modern technological advances in instrumentation have improved both capability and cost (Williams, 2016), but available techniques remain limited in terms of spatial coverage and widespread application.

Corrosion of Munitions Housings and Release of Explosives

Munitions exposed to seawater for long periods of time experience extensive corrosion, but constraining corrosion processes in the heterogeneous environments affecting undersea munitions is exceptionally difficult (MEDEA, 1997). Consequently, there is little quantitative evaluation available on corrosion of undersea munitions. Salinity, temperature, and pressure are all likely to play an important role in corrosion rates (Rossland et al., 2010; MacLeod, 2016; Jurczak and Fabisiak, 2017). In contrast, Granbom (1994) remarked that these parameters have little effect on corrosion rates, although no data were provided. Similar anecdotal reports from 1996 suggested that chemical munitions dumped in the Baltic following WWII have corroded by between 70 and 100% (Lisichkin, 1996; Surikov, 1996). A number of reports have noted a Russian estimate that corrosion will lead to maximum chemical release rates in the early twenty first century from submerged munitions in the Baltic Sea (Granbom, 1994; Malyshev, 1996; Glasby, 1997). One study on WWII-era shipwrecks in Micronesia measured corrosion rates on the order of 0.1 mm y⁻¹ (MacLeod, 2016), suggesting that corrosion depths after 70 years may be nearly 1 cm.

One study in Hawaii (US) examined nearly 2000 submerged WWII-era munitions, and found that some 95% had a significant to severe degree of corrosion (Silva and Chock, 2016). Similarly, a Danish report indicated that munitions in the Bornholm Basin are “completely corroded” (Sanderson and Fauser, 2015). In the Adriatic Sea, chemical munitions have been observed on the seafloor with corrosion extensive enough that the munition material was exposed or spread on the surrounding sediment surface (Amato et al., 2006a). Many of the munition walls were breached, with contents exposed to seawater, and unusual corrosion features such as secondary concretions were observed (Silva and Chock, 2016). Munition shells recovered from the seafloor in another study showed that these secondary concretions include Fe hydroxychloride, Fe-(hydr)oxide, Fe carbonate, and Ca carbonate (George et al., 2015; Li et al., 2016). The use of different metal types in munition bodies, such as steel casing and copper driving band, can lead to accelerated galvanic corrosion, although authigenic mineral precipitation and biological overgrowth may slow corrosion rates (George et al., 2015; Srinivasan and Hihara, 2016; Jurczak and Fabisiak, 2017). On the other hand, biological encrustations may increase metal corrosion by increasing the oxygen flux to the surface (MacLeod, 2016). Corrosion also appears to be inhibited when munitions are buried in sediments or exposed to anoxic conditions (Wang et al., 2011; George et al., 2015).

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the release of munition compounds (MC) from munitions in aquatic environments is greater for munitions exposed in the water column compared with those buried in sediments (Wang et al., 2013). Release rates also increase with increases in munition casing breach size (i.e., exposure area of solid explosive material) and with increasing current and water mixing rates (Wang et al., 2013). It has been suggested that corrosion rates increase greatly with current speed or stirring (Granbom, 1994; Overfield and Symons, 2009), suggesting that high energy environments such as shallow coastal waters may promote both exposure and dissolution of explosive material. Modeled release rates are consistent with experimental measurements of explosives dissolution under variable mixing conditions (Lynch, 2002; Lynch et al., 2002).

Modeling efforts suggest that TNT release from submerged munitions is likely to be slow, with predicted concentrations in water near the munitions only on the order of nanograms per liter (Wang et al., 2013). This is consistent with mesocosm experiments showing slow dissolution and rapid dilution of dissolved MC in water overlying exposed munition fragments under low flow conditions (Rosen and Lotufo, 2010). Munition material exposed to seawater in situ for 3 years showed minor visual evidence of dissolution (Ek et al., 2006), surprising, as the authors note, given that TNT solubility is on the order of 10¹–10² mg L⁻¹ (i.e., tens to hundreds of milligrams MC per liter water; see below).

Dissolution of Munition Compounds

Some basic physicochemical parameters for TNT, RDX, and HMX are shown in Table 1. In general, these data illustrate that the MCs of interest exhibit very low volatility and are not strongly hydrophobic and therefore unlikely to sorb strongly to particle surfaces. In contrast, dissolution of these compounds from solid explosives shows marked dependence on factors such as temperature, and environmental variation is therefore likely to influence the dissolution and release of MC from solid explosives. Dissolution of MC from explosive solids represents the initial controlling factor for release into the environment and exposure to ecological receptors.

TABLE 1

Table 1. Physicochemical properties of TNT, RDX, and HMX.

Solubility

The trend of TNT solubility with temperature is consistent across freshwater studies, increasing from approximately 50 mg L⁻¹ at 2°C to 100 mg L⁻¹ at 25°C, and increasing rapidly at higher temperatures (Figure 4A; Table 2). However, there remains substantial variability in measured solubility at temperatures relevant to the marine environment. For example, at 20°C, reported solubility for TNT varies between 70 and 120 mg L⁻¹ among different studies. There appears to be little effect of pH on TNT dissolution within the environmentally-relevant temperature range (Ro et al., 1996; Lynch et al., 2001). At high pH (>9) and temperature above 40°C, dissolution appears to be suppressed, although this may be related to chemical decomposition or transformation processes (Ro et al., 1996).

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. MC solubility as a function of temperature. (A) TNT, (B) RDX, (C) HMX. Solid (freshwater) and dashed (seawater) lines represent visual fits to the data, omitting apparent outliers, according to the exponential model used by Bier et al. (1999) (Solubility = a*e^bT; coefficients are given in Table 2). Letters identify data sources: a, Taylor and Rinkenbach (1923); b, Hale et al. (1979); c, Spanggord et al. (1983); d, Leggett (1985); e, Rosenblatt et al. (1989); f, Ro et al. (1996); g, Lynch et al. (2001); h, Phelan and Barnett (2001); i, (Composition B, tap water) (Phelan et al., 2002); j, (freshwater) (Luning Prak and O'Sullivan, 2006); k, (seawater) (Luning Prak and O'Sullivan, 2006); l, Banerjee (1980); m, Sikka et al. (1980); n, Bier et al. (1999); o, (pure RDX, deionized water) (Phelan et al., 2002); p, (pure RDX, tap water) (Phelan et al., 2002); q, Monteil-Rivera et al. (2004); r, Glover and Hoffsommer (1973); s, Spanggord et al. (1982); t, McLellan et al. (1988).

TABLE 2

Table 2. Coefficients for exponential fits of MC solubility as a function of temperature (Figure 4).

Solubility curves for RDX and HMX also show an exponential increase with temperature, although less data is available than for TNT (Figures 4B,C). RDX and HMX show 3- and 60-fold lower solubility than TNT, respectively, although the relative difference decreases as temperature increases (Figure 5). For example, the relative difference in solubility between TNT and HMX decreases by nearly a factor of two between 0 and 25°C. This suggests that the spread of different MC from submerged munitions will vary in part due to differential dissolution of components within explosive mixtures, as has been observed in terrestrial systems (Efroymson et al., 2009).

FIGURE 5

Figure 5. (A) Solubility of TNT, RDX, and HMX as a function of temperature according to the exponential model (Bier et al., 1999) (Table 2). (B) Relative solubility of TNT, RDX, and HMX as a function of temperature.

To our knowledge, only two reports have examined the solubility of MC in seawater compared with fresh water (Luning Prak and O'Sullivan, 2006, 2007). In general, MC are moderately less soluble (~20% lower) in seawater than fresh water (e.g., TNT, Figure 4A), although no effect is evident in tap or fresh water compared with deionized water. Addition of organic substrates such as molasses in laboratory experiments appears to enhance the solubility of MC (Fuller et al., 2004). Release of adsorbed TNT is similarly enhanced in the presence of surfactants (Boopathy and Manning, 1999), suggesting that MC solubility may be elevated in systems with high concentrations of dissolved organic matter.

Dissolution Kinetics

A wide range of rates has been reported for MC dissolution from munition solids, with the greatest difference apparently due to stirring or mixing speed (Table 3). The 1,000-fold variation in dissolution rate with mixing speed far exceeds the slight reduction of dissolution rate in seawater compared with fresh water (Brannon et al., 2005). This implies that munition dissolution in seawater may depend most strongly on physical processes regulating transport from the solid surface, and release will therefore vary among sites (e.g., depending on waves, currents, and tides). This is consistent with the results of Porter et al. (2011) who showed that dissolved TNT was saturated within breached munitions, but concentrations declined by over three orders-of-magnitude within 10 cm of the munition surface.

TABLE 3

Table 3. Dissolution rates of TNT, RDX, and HMX from pure and composite explosives.

The dissolution rate increases rapidly with temperature, with a 4-fold increase from 10°C to 30°C (Table 3). From the measured dissolution rates and reported solubilities (Figure 4), MC concentrations would be expected to reach saturated concentrations within a few days in a well-stirred, enclosed system. However, under low flow, poorly mixed conditions (e.g., Thiboutot et al., 1998), MC dissolution may require weeks to months to reach saturation.

Dissolution of MC from solid explosives also depends on formulation, with less-soluble components such as RDX tending to suppress dissolution rates of more soluble components such as TNT (Lynch et al., 2001; Lever et al., 2005). The explosive formulation also determines the relative exposed surface of specific MC. For example, surface area-normalized RDX dissolution was twice as fast from C4 (82% RDX, 9% HMX, 9% plasticizers) than from Composition B (54% RDX, 6% HMX, 40% TNT) (Morley et al., 2006). However, explosive mixtures do not appear to impact the saturation concentration of the individual MC (e.g., Phelan et al., 2002, Figure 4B).

Field Studies and Detection

Organic MC

Several different analytical methods have been reported for detection of MCs in environmental samples (Barshick and Griest, 1998; Bromage et al., 2007; Badjagbo and Sauvé, 2012a; Xu et al., 2014; Rapp-Wright et al., 2017), but vary in their specificity, simplicity, and detection limits. The most widely used method of dissolved MC analysis relies on solvent extraction, separation by HPLC, and UV-VIS detection to achieve detection limits in the μg L⁻¹ range (US EPA Method 8330) (EPA, U. S., 2007). However, UV-VIS detection does not allow definitive compound identification or analysis of poor light-absorbing MCs such as nitroglycerine or [3-Nitrooxy-2,2-bis(nitroxymethyl)propyl] nitrate (PETN). In addition, mobile phase conditions can result in poor peak separation and shifts in retention time, complicating compound identification. In addition, colored organic matter is abundant in seawater, and can interfere with detection by UV-VIS spectrometry. More recently, atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) (Badjagbo and Sauvé, 2012a; Xu et al., 2014; Rapp-Wright et al., 2017), electrospray ionization (ESI) (Gapeev et al., 2003), and electron impact ionization (EI) (Yinon, 1982; Berg et al., 2007) mass spectrometry (MS) (Badjagbo and Sauvé, 2012b) have been successfully applied for the analysis of MCs, with greatly enhanced sensitivities and specificity. To our knowledge, these methods have not yet been applied to studies of MC distribution and behavior in the marine environment.

A number of studies have attempted to measure MCs in seawater, sediments, and organisms, and the results have been rather variable from site to site (Lotufo et al., 2017). The variability of detections as a function of distance from the target is likely due to the filamentous nature of the plumes emanating from the target (Rodacy et al., 2001; Camilli et al., 2009). One of the earliest reports of positive detection found low μg kg⁻¹ levels of TNT and DNT in sediments near intact, live munitions in Halifax Harbor, Canada (Darrach et al., 1998). Another study from Halifax (Rodacy et al., 2001) used solid-phase micro extraction to sample MC in seawater near submerged munitions, and found trace levels of DNB, DNT, and ADNT in the dissolved phase (< 1 μg L⁻¹). This study also measured 10¹–10² μg kg⁻¹ levels of TNT, TNB, DNB, DNT, and ADNT in sediments collected near munitions. In two later studies from Halifax, MC were detected following detonation events (BIP), but not at historical dumpsites (Ampleman et al., 2004).

Seafloor incubations of purposely halved artillery shells (i.e., freshly exposed TNT and RDX) in one Swedish study did not result in measurable TNT or degradation products in the water column or adjacent sediments (Ek et al., 2006). Another study in the Baltic Sea detected TNT and ADNT in sediment samples near a munitions dumpsite (Pfeiffer, 2012b). A study at Ordnance Reef, Hawaii, USA, found DNT of probable munition origin in 5 of 47 sediment samples, but it was unclear if the compounds could have come from other, industrial sources (Decarlo et al., 2007). No MC were detected in fish at Ordnance Reef (Decarlo et al., 2007). Mustard agent compounds were detected in sediments near chemical munition dumpsites in Skaggerak basin (Granbom, 1996), indicating the potential for shell breaching and chemical release.

One of the most extensive studies on MC distribution at undersea sites was performed at Vieques Island, Puerto Rico (Porter et al., 2011). The authors measured TNT concentrations near maximum solubility within breached munitions (up to 86 mg L⁻¹), and low concentrations (low μg L⁻¹) in the nearby water column. A number of other munition-derived compounds were also detected, including di- and mono-nitrotoluenes, nitrobenzenes, and RDX. Munition compounds were detected in many, but not all, sediments and biota (corals, feather duster worms, and sea urchins) near munitions. In contrast, no MC were detected in water, sediment, or organism tissue in other studies at heavily contaminated sites in Vieques Island (NOAA and Ridolfi, 2006; CH2M HILL, 2015). Similarly, HMX was not observed in porewater or sediment samples at naval weapons training sites in Vieques (Simmons et al., 2007).

It is important to bear in mind that many of the organic MC and their transformation products are strongly bound in biotic tissues and during sorption, to the extent that solvent-extraction and identification are hampered (Pennington et al., 1995; Achtnich et al., 1999; Ownby et al., 2005; Ballentine et al., 2015; Ariyarathna et al., 2016). Procedures using multi-step extractions including acid and base reagents have achieved more complete recovery of MCs (Thorne and Leggett, 1997; Belden et al., 2011; Lotufo et al., 2016). This suggests that lack of MC detection in previous studies may be a methodological artifact or lack of sensitivity, and not definitive of MC absence in sediments or biota.

Metals

Terrestrial military ranges show clear contamination of metals from weapons firing (e.g., Stauffer et al., 2017), but most studies of metal release from undersea munitions show little evidence for contamination above background levels (e.g., Decarlo et al., 2007; Garcia et al., 2009). One study in Halifax, Canada, found high levels of metals including Pb in sediments near munitions dumpsites, but it was not clear that the contamination was derived from the munitions (Ampleman et al., 2004). Valkovic et al. (2009) found trends suggesting that sediment Cr and Ni content was elevated in the vicinity of a torpedo in coastal waters of Croatia. Porter et al. (2011) observed elevated levels of Cr in sediments near submerged munitions.

Peaks in Hg deposition in North and South America and western Europe occurred around 1940, coinciding with the period of maximum production during WWII (Biester et al., 2002; Schuster et al., 2002; Corella et al., 2017). Mercury contamination of sediments near munitions dumpsites in the Baltic Sea is generally not elevated relative to other sites within the region (Gebka et al., 2016). Elevated levels of Hg in fish near munitions dumpsites have been attributed to mercury fulminate (Della Torre et al., 2010), although a definitive link was not shown. Mercury records in corals from the South China Sea show peaks in concentration that appear to coincide with regional wars (Sun et al., 2016). However, it is unclear if a munition Hg source is substantial enough to sufficiently elevate concentrations in seawater (C. Lamborg, as cited by Monahan, 2016).

Transformation and Mineralization

Several excellent comprehensive reviews are available that describe environmental pathways for MC degradation (Spain et al., 2000; Monteil-Rivera et al., 2009; Kalderis et al., 2011; Szecsody et al., 2014). Some of the known major pathways are described here to illustrate the transformation and degradation products that are likely to occur under environmental conditions at marine munitions sites (Figures 6–9). Because photolysis and Fenton reaction mechanisms tend to produce different reaction products from the primary biotic pathways, they are discussed separately below. The geochemical behavior of different reaction products determines their persistence, and indeed their ability to be detected using current analytical methods, in water, sediments, and biota.

FIGURE 6

Figure 6. TNT transformation via reduction of nitro groups. Arrow color indicates mechanism, and wider arrows indicate preferential pathways. Letters next to arrows correspond to literature references: a, Juhasz and Naidu (2007), Monteil-Rivera et al. (2009), Spanggord et al. (1983), Lenke et al. (2000), Spain (1995), Preuss et al. (1993), Hawari et al. (2000b), and Jarand et al. (2011); b, Schmidt and Butte (1999).

Reports of TNT degradation conflict on whether TNT is microbially mineralized to CO₂ and inorganic N, or if it is simply transformed primarily to amino derivatives (Figure 6) (Hawari et al., 2000a). In contrast, RDX and HMX can be transformed to nitroso forms, but also readily undergo ring cleavage and mineralization (Figure 9) (Halasz and Hawari, 2011). Microbial transformation of TNT in terrestrial systems appears to occur primarily via reduction of the nitro groups, but does not lead to mineralization (Best et al., 1999; Wijker et al., 2013). Zheng et al. (2009) showed that TNT, RDX, and HMX all degraded to amino or nitroso derivatives when streamwater permeated through anoxic riverbank sediments, but only TNT degraded under oxic conditions. Thus, geohydrologic controls that drive seawater circulation through permeable sediments (e.g., Santos et al., 2012) may promote MC degradation in coastal marine systems. Mineralization of TNT and RDX has been reported under remediation conditions by photolysis (Yardin and Chiron, 2006) and alkaline hydrolysis (Felt et al., 2001).

Some enzymes act not only as reductases, but can also react with TNT by hydride or hydroxyl addition to form Meisenheimer complexes with subsequent release of nitrite and ring cleavage (Figure 7) (Lenke et al., 2000; Williams et al., 2004; Symons and Bruce, 2006). Hydride addition to TNT has been shown for a marine yeast (Ziganshin et al., 2007). Reaction products may also undergo condensation reaction to form stable diarylamines (Wittich et al., 2008).

FIGURE 7

Figure 7. TNT transformation and mineralization via Meisenheimer complex intermediates. Symbols as in Figure 6. References: a, Lenke et al. (2000) and Mills et al. (2003); b, Symons and Bruce (2006), Lenke et al. (2000), Ziganshin et al. (2007), and Rieger et al. (1999); c, Williams et al. (2004) and Wittich et al. (2008); d, Williams et al. (2004).

TNT Transformation

TNT transformation generally occurs via sequential reduction of the nitro groups to amino forms (Figure 6), and can occur by both biotic and abiotic mechanisms (Spain, 1995; Brannon and Pennington, 2002). The mono- and di-amino forms (ADNT and DANT, respectively) are produced by both bacteria and fungi via aerobic and anaerobic pathways (see detailed reviews in Spain, 1995; Juhasz and Naidu, 2007; Monteil-Rivera et al., 2009). Triaminotoluene (TAT) is formed only under strict anaerobic conditions (e.g., Preuss et al., 1993), although it tends to be removed rapidly from solution and is not persistent (see below).

There is extensive evidence for regioselective reduction of TNT nitro moieties, with the para form dominating over the ortho form to a variable degree depending on the relative importance of abiotic and biotic pathways (Barrows et al., 1997). In one study conducted with sludge incubation, concentrations of 4-ADNT and 2,4-DANT reached two- and ten-fold higher, respectively, than the 2-ADNT and 2,6-DANT forms (Hawari et al., 1998). Similar preferential formation of 4-ADNT has been shown in other soil and plant systems (Harvey et al., 1990). In aerobic sediment incubations, TNT removal was rapid, with little TNT sorption and virtually exclusive formation of the 4-ADNT and 2,4-DANT metabolites (Elovitz and Weber, 1999). Under anaerobic conditions, degradation is more rapid [minutes time scale (Preuss et al., 1993; Elovitz and Weber, 1999)], and appears to rapidly progress to the 2,4-DANT product (Elovitz and Weber, 1999).

Rates of nitro group reduction under aerobic conditions decrease sequentially (Elovitz and Weber, 1999), and TNT degradation products may be removed from solution by sorption and binding to solid phases (see below) before progressing to the terminal TAT product. This also implies a greater immobilization of the ADNT forms compared with DANT. TAT is not stable in solution, undergoing hydrolysis to azo- (under anoxic conditions) and hydroxy- (under oxic conditions) intermediate forms, and eventually polymerizing and precipitating (Hawari et al., 1998). Unknown products formed under anoxic conditions appear to be derived from a TAT precursor (Elovitz and Weber, 1999), consistent with formation of TAT hydrolysis azo- products (Hawari et al., 1998).

TNT Mineralization

TNT mineralization in terrestrial systems occurs very slowly, with a reported half-life up to several decades (Wijker et al., 2013). Evolution of CO₂ from ¹⁴C-labeled TNT has been observed in biotic soil incubations, but rates were slow and indicated half-lives of 4–10 years (Cataldo et al., 1989). Mineralization of TNT was also very low in wetland experiments (Best et al., 1999). Most of the TNT transformation (>80%) in these incubations was accounted for by ADNT formation, although approximately 50% of the label was in the non-extractable pool after 2 months. Interestingly, the authors observed ADNT formation in both biotic and radiation-sterilized treatments, although to a lesser degree in the latter.

Degradation experiments using seawater from the North Sea also showed slow mineralization rates, with half-life on the order of 5 years (Harrison and Vane, 2010). In contrast, TNT, RDX, and HMX degradation in some coastal waters, especially fresh-saline mixing zones, may occur much more rapidly, on the order of days to weeks (Montgomery et al., 2014). Degradation rates in sediments tend to be faster than those in water (Harrison and Vane, 2010). Montgomery et al. (2011a) proposed that the mineralization observed in marine systems, but not terrestrial systems, may be why MC are rarely observed in marine sediments.

In marine mesocosm experiments using ¹⁵N-TNT, Smith et al. (2015a) showed a rapid decrease in dissolved TNT, with most of the labeled N either in sediments or in an undetected “missing” pool (maximum of ~20% and >80%, respectively, at different time points). A small fraction of the labeled N did appear either in macrobiota biomass (approximately 15%), or as dissolved, inorganic remineralization products (~7%), consistent with the ability of some microbes to use TNT-nitrogen for growth (Wittich et al., 2009). The only TNT transformation product detected in the mesocosms was ADNT, with slight preferential formation of the 4A-DNT isomer (Smith et al., 2015a). These researchers hypothesized that further deamination of ADNT led to unidentified products comprising the “missing” pool.

Montgomery et al. (2011a) hypothesized that because marine systems tend to be nitrogen-limited, microbial mineralization of nitroaromatics is more likely than in P-limited terrestrial or aquifer environments. They studied a range of estuarine and coastal marine sites in the USA (Kahana Bay, Chesapeake Bay, Delaware Bay, and San Francisco Bay), and report that although TNT mineralization in sediments was variably observed in space and time, it was measurable at least once at virtually all sites (Walker et al., 2006).

A relatively small fraction of TNT added to water and sediment slurries is mineralized (generally < 10%, but up to 30%), but 80–99% of the mineralized TNT-carbon is incorporated into bacterial biomass (Montgomery et al., 2011b, and references therein). This suggests that most of the TNT metabolism occurs via assimilation for biomass production rather than solely as an energy source (Montgomery et al., 2013). Mineralization of N from TNT and RDX has also been observed in sediment slurries, with predominant formation of ${NH}_{4}^{+}$ , and some N₂ production from RDX (Smith et al., 2015b; Ariyarathna et al., 2016). A small fraction of the mineralized TNT-N can be incorporated into photo- and hetero-trophic biomass such as nucleic acids (Roh et al., 2009; Hatzinger and Fuller, 2014; Smith et al., 2015a).

RDX and HMX Transformation and Mineralization

RDX and HMX appear to follow similar transformation and mineralization pathways (Figure 9), although RDX has been far more intensively studied. Both compounds undergo reduction to nitroso derivatives, which can also act as intermediates to further degradation (McCormick et al., 1981, 1984). Ring-cleavage of RDX, HMX, or their nitroso forms results in complete mineralization or formation of the intermediate compounds methylenedinitramine (MEDINA) or nitrodiazabutanal (NDAB) (Hawari et al., 2000a; Jackson et al., 2007; Monteil-Rivera et al., 2009). The nitroso derivatives and NDAB formed by transformation or mineralization of RDX are relatively stable under most environmental conditions, while MEDINA is unstable (Paquet et al., 2011). Sea salts may enhance the stability of MEDINA (Paquet et al., 2011).

Both RDX and HMX showed mineralization to CO₂ in radiolabel experiments with marine sediments (Lotufo et al., 2001; Pennington et al., 2011). Limited RDX mineralization was observed in wetland experiments (Best et al., 1999). Mineralization of RDX has been reported under remediation conditions by photolysis (Yardin and Chiron, 2006) and alkaline hydrolysis (Felt et al., 2001). Mineralization of RDX and HMX by abiotic alkaline hydrolysis has also been reported for marine waters, although rates were slow and highly temperature-dependent, with half lives on the order of decades or longer under environmental temperatures (Monteil-Rivera et al., 2008).

Marine mesocosm experiments using ¹⁵N-RDX showed greater than 50% removal over a 3-week incubation period (Smith et al., 2015b). Approximately 30% of the loss occurred by remineralization to dinitrogen gas. The authors argued that this denitrification proceeds via ring cleavage, and that subsequent degradation led to formation of undetected products that represented the balance of removed RDX label. Subsequent investigation showed some production of MEDINA followed by ${NH}_{4}^{+}$ , with the majority of the RDX label in unidentified pools (Ariyarathna et al., 2016).

In one study comparing different estuarine systems, RDX and HMX mineralization in sediments was only reported for one site (Kahana Bay, Hawaii), at locations with salinity equal to or greater than 15%0 (Montgomery et al., 2011a). RDX and HMX mineralization rates were approximately five-fold lower than those for TNT. In a similar study, RDX and HMX mineralization was observed in water and sediments from sites in Florida (USA), with rates comparable to TNT (Montgomery et al., 2014).

Photolysis

Light absorption by TNT is strongest at approximately 235 nm, and generally higher at wavelengths shorter than 300 nm (Li et al., 1998). RDX and HMX both absorb light most strongly at approximately 190 nm (Smit, 1991). Consistent with absorption in the UV range, MC photodegradation in seawater occurs at wavelengths below 320 nm (Luning Prak et al., 2013). Interestingly, Mabey et al. (1983) showed that TNT photolysis can occur in natural waters by irradiation at wavelengths above 420 nm, indicating that light absorption by solutes such as humics can indirectly promote TNT degradation (Dunnivant et al., 1992). Irradiance decreases rapidly with depth in the ocean, although less at short wavelengths than long wavelengths. In colored, productive, or turbid coastal waters such as the Baltic Sea, irradiance can decrease by several orders of magnitude within only a few meters of the surface (Wozniak and Dera, 2007). Consequently, photolysis and photodegradation of MC likely play a role only in very shallow or clear waters. Nonetheless, the fast rate and extent of MC photo reactions make them potentially important in MC persistence in the marine environment. In addition, photodegradation of many MC appears to create products that are more toxic than the initial parent compounds (Dave et al., 2000; Woodley and Downs, 2014).

Photodegradation is particularly important for TNT, and can produce a variety of reaction products with a range of stabilities (Figure 8) (Burlinson et al., 1979b). Photolysis half-lives of TNT and DNT in natural waters are on the order of 10⁰–10¹ h (Mabey et al., 1983; Mihas et al., 2007). The predominant product observed in laboratory experiments is ADNBA (Taylor et al., 2010; Luning Prak et al., 2017), which has also been detected in terrestrial and groundwater systems affected by munition compound contamination (Spanggord et al., 1983; Grummt et al., 2006). However, the primary stable product of TNT photolysis under environmental conditions may be TNB, although trinitrobenzaldehyde (TNBCHO), trinitrobenzoic acid (TNBCOOH), and aminodinitrobenzoic acid (ADNBA) are likely more important in seawater (Luning Prak et al., 2017).

FIGURE 8

Figure 8. TNT transformation and mineralization via photo- and Fenton- reaction. Symbols as in Figure 6. References: a, Spanggord et al. (1983), Godejohann et al. (1998), Luning Prak et al. (2017), and Burlinson et al. (1979a); b, Luning Prak et al. (2017) and Burlinson et al. (1979a); c, Luning Prak et al. (2017); d, Godejohann et al. (1998), Kaplan et al. (1975), and Schmelling and Gray (1995); e, Spanggord et al. (1983) and Godejohann et al. (1998); f, Jarand et al. (2011) and Hess et al. (2003); g, Hess et al. (2003); h, Hess et al. (2003), Liou et al. (2003), and Li et al. (1998); i, Spanggord et al. (1983) and Godejohann et al. (1998).

In addition to these mono-cyclic compounds, highly-soluble, reddish photoreaction products are widely observed to form (Kaplan et al., 1975; Spanggord et al., 1980; Mabey et al., 1983; Taylor et al., 2009). Photochemical degradation of DNT produces similar colored high-molecular weight products (370–430 g mol⁻¹) (Nipper et al., 2004). Taylor et al. (2010) provide the most extensive investigation of these colored TNT photodegradation compounds. The authors demonstrated that the reddish compounds form only under damp or wet conditions (cf. Kunz et al., 2012; Gares et al., 2014). Following dissolution of TNT, photochemical reaction produces a TNT anion that condenses with itself to form an unstable red-colored intermediate compound. This intermediate can dissociate back to TNT, or hydrolyze further to form a stable red-colored product that is acidic and water-soluble.

Photolysis rates for TNT increase with salt concentration (e.g., pure water < < natural fresh water < estuarine water < seawater), from 10¹ h in deionized water to 10⁰ h in seawater (Luning Prak et al., 2013; Sisco et al., 2015). Photolysis of DNT increased by a factor of three in seawater and NaCl solutions compared with distilled water (Mihas et al., 2007). The reaction rate in seawater was nearly 5-fold slower after the seawater was passed over a Chelex resin column to remove trace metals (Luning Prak et al., 2013). This suggests that the photolysis rate increase observed in seawater may not be due solely to major salts (see also section on Fenton Reaction, below). This is consistent with other studies showing enhanced photodegradation in the presence of metals such as Fe(II) and TiO₂ (Schmelling and Gray, 1995; Liou et al., 2003).

Mabey et al. (1983) showed that TNT photolysis increased by 1–2 orders of magnitude in filtered natural freshwaters compared with distilled water, apparently due to interaction with humic and fulvic substances. A similar effect of dissolved humics has been shown for DNT degradation (Mihas et al., 2007). While there is evidence that photolysis is reduced at low pH in pure water (Burlinson et al., 1973), the influence of solutes such as humic acids in natural waters are likely to be far more important than pH (Mabey et al., 1983). This is consistent with experiments in marine and estuarine water showing little pH effect between pH 6 and 8 (Luning Prak et al., 2017). Photolysis of TNT in pure water is enhanced by dissolved nitrate, but there is little evidence that nitrate affects photolysis rates in natural waters (O'Sullivan et al., 2011; Luning Prak et al., 2013).

Photodecomposition can be a major removal pathway for dissolved RDX, producing similar products to biotic degradation including NDAB and smaller inorganics (Figure 9) (Hawari et al., 2002; Monteil-Rivera et al., 2009). RDX photo-reaction rates are much slower than observed for TNT, with a half-life on the order of years (Spanggord et al., 1983). A slight increase in RDX degradation rate was observed in saline vs. fresh waters upon exposure to artificial sunlight (Sisco et al., 2015).

FIGURE 9

Figure 9. RDX transformation and mineralization reaction pathways. HMX degradation follows identical pathways, and is not shown here for simplicity. References: a, Juhasz and Naidu (2007), McCormick et al. (1981), Van Aken et al. (2004), Hawari et al. (2001), and Sheremata et al. (2001); b, Ariyarathna et al. (2016), Halasz and Hawari (2011), Smith et al. (2015b), Liou et al. (2003), and Hawari et al. (2001); c, McCormick et al. (1981), Jackson et al. (2007), and Hawari et al. (2000c); d, Liou et al. (2003), Oh et al. (2003), and Zoh and Stenstrom (2002); e, Jackson et al. (2007) and Monteil-Rivera et al. (2008); f, Van Aken et al. (2004); g, Van Aken et al. (2004) and Bose et al. (1998); h, Ariyarathna et al. (2016), Hawari et al. (2000c), Monteil-Rivera et al. (2008), and Zhao et al. (2004); i, McCormick et al. (1981).

Fenton Reaction

One possible mechanism for MC degradation or transformation apart from nitro group reduction is via the Fenton reaction, which occurs widely in natural and marine waters (Völker et al., 1997; Qian et al., 2001; Southworth, 2002; White et al., 2003). Fenton chemistry involves a mixture of Fe(II) and hydrogen peroxide to generate hydroxyl radicals, which are powerful oxidants. Several studies have examined the potential for Fenton reactions in remediation of TNT in the environment (Ayoub et al., 2010). Fenton degradation of TNT causes oxidation of the methyl group and can produce trinitrobenzoic acid (TNBA) and TNB (Figure 8) (Hess et al., 2003; Jarand et al., 2011). Alternatively, TNT- and TNB-hydroperoxyl radical formation can lead to denitration and hydroxylation, leading to trihydroxybenzene and eventually oxalic acid (Hess et al., 2003). One study suggested that ADNT can also be formed by Fenton reaction in the presence of glucose and cyclodextrins (Jarand et al., 2011), although the nitro-group reduction pathway has not been widely reported. Fenton degradation of nitrotoluenes and their amine derivatives has also been demonstrated, and showed oxidation of the methyl group, deamination, and cleavage of nitro groups (Li et al., 1998; Schmidt and Butte, 1999). Degradation of RDX and HMX has also been shown to occur via a Fenton mechanism (Zoh and Stenstrom, 2002; Oh et al., 2003), although at rates slower than TNT (approximately 85, 60, and 2 d⁻¹ for TNT, RDX, and HMX, respectively) (Liou et al., 2003).

Sorption

Solute partitioning among dissolved and particulate phases is commonly described using two different sorption models: Freundlich, and Langmuir (Barrow, 2008). In the Freundlich model, the concentration of sorbed constituent (C_s) is related to the concentration of the dissolved constituent (C_d) by the Freundlich sorption/partitioning coefficient, K_F:

\begin{array}{rcl} C_{s} = K_{F} C_{d}^{n} & (1) \end{array}

The superscript, n, represents a unitless coefficient of linearity; when n is equal to unity, the constituent exhibits linear sorption (i.e., the expression reduces to the common distribution coefficient, K_d).

The Langmuir model describes sorption in terms of saturation of the sorbent surface sites:

\begin{array}{rcl} C_{s} = \frac{K_{L} C_{s}^{max} C_{d}}{1 + K_{L} C_{d}} & (2) \end{array}

Where, K_L is the Langmuir sorption coefficient, and $C_{s}^{m a x}$ is the maximum number of surface sites available to the constituent.

Sorption of TNT, RDX, and HMX all appear to follow Freundlich behavior (Table 4) (Lee and Stenstrom, 1996; Alavi et al., 2011; Sharma et al., 2013) (but cf. Haderlein and Schwarzenbach, 1993), although the non-linear behavior may only manifest at high concentrations (Sharma et al., 2013) and therefore not be evident under most marine conditions. At lower concentrations, linear sorption equations appear appropriate.

TABLE 4

Table 4. Solid-solution partitioning coefficients and sorption kinetic rate constants for TNT, RDX, and HMX.

Salinity appears to be less important for TNT, RDX, and HMX sorption than the solid phase characteristics (Table 4), although this issue has only been addressed in very few studies. Brannon et al. (2005) found a nearly perfect 1:1 relationship between partition coefficients of RDX and HMX measured in fresh vs. saline water. Sorption of TNT and RDX decreases with increasing temperature, although the magnitude of the effect varies with sediment type (Ariyarathna et al., 2016).

TNT

TNT exhibits weak sorption to soils and sediments (K_d on the order of 10¹; Table 4), although degradation and subsequent sorption of the metabolites can represent a major removal pathway for dissolved TNT (Elovitz and Weber, 1999). Adsorption-desorption curves for TNT and its degradation products generally show hysteresis (Hatzinger et al., 2004; Falone et al., 2006; Singh et al., 2010; Hao et al., 2018), indicating that sorption is not fully reversible.

Evidence for the dominant solid phase controlling MC sorption is ambiguous, with some studies indicating that a combination of clays and organic matter enhance sorption (e.g., Dontsova et al., 2009). TNT shows particular affinity for organic matter, especially humic- and fulvic-like substances (Li et al., 1997; Achtnich et al., 1999; Falone et al., 2006; Sharma et al., 2013; Hao et al., 2018). Adsorbed organic matter appears to have little influence on MC sorption (Weissmahr et al., 1999).

TNT also exhibits substantial adsorption to clay minerals (Haderlein et al., 1996), especially 2:1 clays such as montmorillonite (Table 4) (Price et al., 2000; Brannon et al., 2002). In some soils, clay minerals are more important for total sorption than organic matter (Weissmahr et al., 1999). This is consistent with the reported dependence of TNT sorption on cation exchange capacity (CEC) (Brannon et al., 1999, 2002). Saturation of clay surface exchange sites with singly-charged cations such as K⁺ and ${NH}_{4}^{+}$ promotes increased sorption of TNT, by as much as several orders-of-magnitude (Haderlein and Schwarzenbach, 1993; Haderlein et al., 1996; Price et al., 2000; Brannon et al., 2002; Charles et al., 2006). This does not appear to be the case for RDX or HMX (Brannon et al., 2002).

Other minerals such as amorphous and crystalline Fe oxide minerals are also abundant in marine systems, but evidence for their effect on TNT sorption to sediments is equivocal (Pennington and Patrick, 1990; Ainsworth et al., 1993; Weissmahr et al., 1998). Dontsova et al. (2009) argue that Fe oxides may even interfere with TNT sorption to clays. In general, Fe oxides and calcium carbonate do not appear to sorb TNT strongly (Table 4) (Weissmahr et al., 1998).

TNT Transformation Products

Sorption of ADNT to topsoils in one study was only slightly higher than for TNT (7.9 vs. 6.4 L kg⁻¹), whereas DANT sorption was much higher (12.0 L kg⁻¹) (Sheremata et al., 1999). In contrast, sorption to pure illites (also 2:1 clay) was highest for TNT (223 L kg⁻¹), and lower for ADNT and DANT (59 and 20 L kg⁻¹, respectively) (Sheremata et al., 1999). All of these compounds show desorption hysteresis. Sorption of TNT degradation products, 2,4-dinitrotoluene and nitrobenzene, was more strongly controlled by soil organic matter than clay minerals (Zhang et al., 2009).

Experiments using radiolabeled MCs have shown that TNT degradation products are often bound in solvent non-extractable forms (Caton et al., 1994; Pennington et al., 1995; Achtnich et al., 1999). These irreversibly bound products are formed in a two-step process, with the initial form extractable by acid or acid-base hydrolysis (Thorne and Leggett, 1997). The major reductive degradation products of TNT (ADNTs, DANTs, and TAT) react with soil humic acids to form both heterocyclic and nonheterocyclic condensation products (Bruns-Nagel et al., 2000; Thorn and Kennedy, 2002). Reaction with quinone groups in humic acids has been proposed to explain the greater extent of irreversible binding observed in oxic sediments than reducing sediments (Elovitz and Weber, 1999), depending on whether redox equilibrium favors the oxidized quinone or reduced hydroquinone form (Thorn and Kennedy, 2002). Sorption of DANT to sediments is rapid and virtually irreversible under oxic conditions (Elovitz and Weber, 1999). Carbonyl functional groups have also been implicated in controlling sorption of TNT to sediments (Singh et al., 2010).

RDX and HMX

RDX and HMX exhibit low, but nearly irreversible sorption to soils, with partition coefficients on the order of 10⁻¹–10¹ L kg⁻¹ (Table 4). RDX transformation products (MNX, DNX, TNX) do not appear to sorb readily to solid surfaces (Sheremata et al., 2001; Heerspink et al., 2017). RDX and HMX both exhibit sorption hysteresis (Hatzinger et al., 2004). Similar to TNT, RDX adsorbs strongly to soils rich in humic substances (Falone et al., 2006), although there is also evidence for a substantial control of clays on adsorption to solids (Dontsova et al., 2009). Some evidence suggests that Fe oxide minerals may enhance RDX sorption (Dontsova et al., 2009).

Adsorbed RDX is not fully mineralized by microbial degradation, progressing only as far as its nitroso products (Sheremata et al., 2001), although the extent of degradation may also depend on geochemistry of the solid phase (Katseanes et al., 2017). Recovery of RDX from sediment incubations is poor, with sorption being limited but nearly irreversible (Sheremata et al., 2001). Limited sorption or degradation of RDX suggests that following dissolution of mixed munition material, it may be transported farther than TNT, as observed in groundwater systems (Spalding and Fulton, 1988).

Toxicity

Of the three MC discussed in this review, only TNT and RDX appear to exhibit toxicity to biological receptors (Table 5). Biological uptake of HMX has been observed (Rosen and Lotufo, 2010), but no toxicity was evident at any of the levels tested (Table 5). In general, dissolved TNT is more toxic than RDX to marine organisms, with acute toxicity occurring at approximately 10⁰ and 10¹ μg L⁻¹ levels, respectively. There is some evidence that TNT transformation products (i.e., ADNTs and DANTs) may be more toxic than the TNT parent, but studies evaluating these compounds are generally limited or lacking for the marine environment (Lotufo et al., 2013). TNT and RDX both exhibit genotoxic effects, whereas HMX does not (Inouye et al., 2009). In mammals, TNT is more cytotoxic than RDX, but effects for either are only evident at very high exposure levels (~1 g kg⁻¹ body weight) (Cenas et al., 2009). Sub-lethal response to TNT and RDX exposure has been reported, and includes effects on growth, reproduction, germination, and gene transcription (Table 5). Sub-lethal effects of TNT on nervous, immune, and blood systems have been shown for earthworms (Gong et al., 2007).

TABLE 5

Table 5. Acute and sublethal toxicity of TNT, RDX, and HMX to marine organisms.

Corroded munitions may also act as hard substrate habitat for organisms (McDonald, 2009; Della Torre et al., 2010), increasing the likelihood of food web exposure to munition related chemicals. Certainly, sessile organisms growing on or directly adjacent to munitions appear to experience the greatest exposure (Porter et al., 2011). Exposed munition material appears resistant to biofouling (Dave, 2003), suggesting that direct contact may be toxic to biota. Qualitative indications of stress in corals growing near underwater munitions have been attributed to MC toxicity (Porter et al., 2011). Chemicals (including ammonium picrate, an ammonium salt of 2,4,6-trinitrophenol) recovered from depth charges (UXO) have been shown to be toxic at high concentrations to reef-dwelling damselfish (Jameson, 1975).

One study directly examined toxicity of sea-dumped munitions to marine organisms (Ek et al., 2006). Artillery shells were sliced open and stored in open, sediment-filled boxes on the seafloor. Sediment toxicity to copepods was observed within 3 months, but no increase in toxicity occurred over three subsequent years, and sediments were not toxic to two other crustaceans tested over the entire period. No TNT uptake or toxicity was observed in fish and mussels deployed near the open munitions. Toxicity of TNT exposure increases with temperature (Ek et al., 2008), as does dissolution from solid munition material (see above), suggesting a dual effect of temperature on exposure and toxic response.

Adsorption of dissolved MC to particles and sediments may reduce toxicity of MC to organisms, and while most of the MC in sediments is not solvent-extractable, the solvent labile fraction has been argued to be the bioavailable component (Hundal et al., 1997). Accumulation of TNT in plants grown in contaminated soil was inversely proportional to the organic matter content of the soils, demonstrating that sorption or complexation of MC may decrease bioavailability in sedimentary systems (Cataldo et al., 1989). Similarly, sediment addition to experiments with copepods and amphipods also decreased toxicity, but only after aging, either due to slow sorption rates or microbial degradation (Dave et al., 2000; Pennington et al., 2011).

Marine algae accumulate dissolved TNT and RDX, and metabolize both to some extent (Cruz-Uribe et al., 2007; Ballentine et al., 2016), whereas TNT is metabolized in mussels but RDX and HMX are not (Rosen and Lotufo, 2007). Bioaccumulation of these MC from aqueous exposure and ingestion in benthic invertebrates and fish appears to be low, and depuration rates relatively high (half-life on the order of hours) (Belden et al., 2005; Lotufo and Lydy, 2005; Ownby et al., 2005; Rosen and Lotufo, 2007; Lotufo et al., 2016). In contrast, TNT transformation products do tend to bioaccumulate to a greater extent, and are depurated more slowly (Belden et al., 2005; Lotufo et al., 2016). Nonetheless, depuration of MC in marine biota may explain why some marine organisms at contaminated sites do not exhibit high levels of MC in tissues (Koide et al., 2016). Less than 20% of the accumulated MC could be extracted in experiments conducted with ¹⁴C-labeled TNT, suggesting that tissue MC measurements in field samples underestimate the true body burden (Cataldo et al., 1989; Ownby et al., 2005; Lotufo et al., 2016).

Studies using freshwater minnows showed overt toxicity of RDX only at very high concentrations (10 mg L⁻¹), but there were significant changes in gene transcript expression at much lower concentrations (0.625 mg L⁻¹) (Gust et al., 2011). Gene functions affected by RDX include such metabolic processes as oxygen transport, neurological function, energy metabolism, and cell growth/division. Gene transcription was also depressed in coral zooxanthellae by RDX concentrations of 1.8 mg L⁻¹, for genes involved in photosynthesis, glycolysis, and electron-transport functions (Gust et al., 2014). Marine organisms tend to exhibit enhanced sensitivity to MC relative to freshwater organisms (Talmage et al., 1999; Nipper et al., 2009; Lotufo et al., 2017), suggesting that similar effects may impact marine organisms at even lower concentrations. This highlights the importance of sublethal effects of MC exposure to aquatic organism health, and predictions based on acute toxicity thresholds may underestimate the threat to marine ecosystems.

Although toxic effects of conventional munitions may be sublethal and difficult to detect, release of compounds from chemical munitions has been implicated in elevated genotoxicity and cytotoxicity observed in fish collected near munitions dumpsites in the Baltic Sea (Baršiene et al., 2014). Results were similar for fish collected near a chemical munitions site in the Adriatic Sea (Della Torre et al., 2010), although no munitions compounds were detected in fish tissues (Amato et al., 2006a). Fish at the site did have higher levels of Hg and As compared to reference sites (Amato et al., 2006a; Della Torre et al., 2010).

Nipper et al. (2009) reviewed toxicity data for TNT on marine organisms, and suggested a TNT Water Quality Criteria (WQC) of 85.4 and 28.4 μg L⁻¹ for acute and chronic toxicity, respectively. In a more recent review, Lotufo et al. (2017) argued for a WQC of 398 and 32.6 μg L⁻¹ for acute and chronic toxicity, respectively. There are fewer estimates for RDX, and the only reported marine WQC is approximately 850 μg L⁻¹ for both acute and chronic toxicity, seven-fold lower than estimated for freshwater organisms (Lotufo et al., 2017). No estimates are available for toxicity of HMX to marine organisms, but freshwater WQCs are 3800 and 330 μg L⁻¹ (Talmage et al., 1999).

It is important to note that toxicity experiments can be difficult to perform due to changes in MC concentration as a result of biogeochemical processes such as sorption or degradation (e.g., Rosen and Lotufo, 2005). Static renewal and constant exposure experiments showed as much as two orders-of-magnitude variation in concentration over time, especially at the lowest nominal concentration (Lotufo et al., 2013). On the other hand, processes such as phototransformation or photoactivation may enhance MC toxicity (Davenport et al., 1994; Johnson et al., 1994; Dave et al., 2000; Woodley and Downs, 2014), and transformation over the course of an experiment may change the actual type of chemical exposure.

Conclusions and Outlook for Future Work

There is a vast quantity of relic munitions on the coastal seafloor, especially in North America, Europe, and the southwest Pacific. In total, these munitions must represent millions of tons of explosive material, a chemical point source of very poorly constrained magnitude. The location, quantity, and identity of munitions were often poorly documented during disposal, and much of the information that does exist may be yet unknown. Sifting through and distilling century-old archives to compile a reliable history of dumping activities is a daunting task, made more difficult because of political and language borders, military classified restrictions, and few experts who understand the specific military slang of that time.

Subsea technology is rapidly maturing to meet the challenge of mapping and identifying underwater munitions. Approaches such as side-scan and multibeam sonar, sub-bottom profiling, and magnetometry have all proved successful for mapping the distribution of DMM and UXO, at least on a local scale. The required effort and cost thus far prohibit broad-scale seafloor imaging at a sufficiently high resolution to detect munitions on the seafloor and in the sub-seafloor. Nonetheless, increasing development of offshore infrastructure such as aquaculture, wind farms, cables, and oil and gas pipelines provides impetus for ongoing improvement of munition detection tools.

Where the location of DMM is known, such as the historical dumping grounds marked explicitly on nautical maps, the risk of chemical release remains uncertain. A number of anecdotal estimates for the corrosion lifetime of underwater munitions appear in fact to be corroborated by visual analysis. The integrity of DMM casings varies widely, but many recent reports suggest that deterioration is widespread. The explosive material that was fully encased for decades may now be increasingly exposed to marine waters and ecosystems. The cessation of sea-dumping of munitions has certainly helped prevent additional ocean pollution, but current and future release of contaminants from relic underwater munitions threatens to undermine the United Nations Development Goal 14 to reduce marine pollution (United Nations, 2017).

The chemical contamination associated with underwater conventional munitions appears almost exclusively to be organic energetic compounds. While munitions do contain toxic metals such as mercury and lead, high environmental (albeit, mostly anthropogenic) background makes it difficult to conclusively identify metals derived from a munition source. However, very few studies have addressed this metal contamination, and definitive identification may require sampling with higher statistical strength, or use of unique source tracers such as metal isotope ratios. Given that toxic metals are one component of the complex chemical point source from munitions, they may add to an overall negative ecological impact on associated biological communities.

Laboratory experiments suggest that temperature has a strong effect on dissolution of solid explosive material, whereas salinity and pH are likely less important. Over the relevant environmental range, temperature may effect a 4- to 6-fold variation in solubility. The few field studies that have been able to collect water samples very close to or within breached munitions show that dissolved munition compound concentrations approach solubility limits (mg L⁻¹ range). Different trends in MC solubility with temperature suggest that a mixed or composite solid explosive source will represent a changing MC source profile over time. Dissolved MCs are rapidly diluted away from the munition point source, and analytical detection limits have largely prevented quantification at levels present in the free water column or sediments (typically at the ng L⁻¹ or μg kg⁻¹ level).

The rates of MC dissolution from solid explosives have been studied extensively under controlled experimental conditions, but do not appear to adequately represent conditions relevant to underwater munitions. At the median value for dissolution found in the literature, the surface of solid explosives should retreat on the order of 10 s of cm every year. This is contradicted by qualitative in situ observations that exposed solid explosives do not experience rapid erosion. In situ measurements of explosive dissolution would greatly help to constrain realistic rates, but the inherent hazard of working with explosives appears to have thus far prevented such work.

Once released from solid explosives, TNT is readily transformed by bacteria and fungi to various amino-toluene derivatives, but probably does not undergo ring cleavage and mineralization. Photochemical and abiotic reaction pathways may result in more complete degradation, but the aromatic structure can be preserved in reaction products such as nitrobenzenes. This suite of TNT daughter products can provide some indication of dominant reaction pathways, and they may prove an important tool for evaluating environmental fate and transport controls. Nonetheless, it is an analytical challenge to measure such a broad set of compounds, and the most widely-applied, HPLC-based EPA 8330 method is not sufficient. In contrast to TNT, RDX and HMX have a greater ability to be fully mineralized. Reaction rates tend to be slow, but result ultimately in destruction of the compounds.

Limited partitioning of MCs onto particles suggests the possibility for long-range transport, especially the less-reactive RDX and HMX. The amino forms of TNT transformation products exhibit increased affinity for particle surfaces with increasing number of amino groups, which may lead to fractionation of TNT and its metabolites along transport paths. The terminal TNT degradation product, TAT, is unlikely to persist in the dissolved phase in oxic marine waters. Polymerization and covalent bonding of MC and associated daughter products to sediments and organic matter present a technical challenge to recovery from environmental samples. Indeed, even when MC are quantitatively recovered, sediment and biota MC content is usually on the order of μg kg⁻¹, and presents an analytical challenge nonetheless.

In general, toxicity studies suggest that levels of MC at munitions-contaminated sites are unlikely to have an adverse effect on biota. Certainly, acute toxicity is highly unlikely. However, it is not clear how well toxicological experiments represent natural communities or in situ conditions. Benthic and epifaunal organisms may be uniquely exposed to MC where corrosion or low-order detonation leave exposed munition material on the seafloor. There is also growing evidence that munition-related chemicals can cause sublethal genetic and metabolic effects in aquatic organisms. Examining the occurrence of MC in natural ecosystems may help clarify potential effects, but analytical difficulty extracting and analyzing MC in tissue remains a challenge.

The study of munitions-related chemicals in the marine environment has been active for nearly a half century, yet we lack a fundamental understanding of MC distribution and behavior in the marine environment. Much of this knowledge gap results from inability to sensitively and specifically measure MC in marine samples, as well as difficulties working with inherently dangerous materials. Advances in mass spectrometry are improving the outlook of the former aspect, but standardization, laboratory intercomparison, and standard reference benchmarks will need to be improved if global research efforts are to be unified. Collaboration between civil and military scientists may be hampered by traditional institutional borders, but is important for bringing together the necessary expertise on munitions materials and marine biogeochemistry. With increasing economic activity in coastal waters, and the apparent impending corrosion threshold, concerted effort to understand the global inventory of underwater munitions is more urgent than ever.

Author Contributions

EA, JG, and CS conceived of the project. AB drafted the manuscript with substantial contributions to the work by all authors. The manuscript was edited and approved by all authors.

Funding

This work was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) through the project UDEMM (Umweltmonitoring für die DElaboration von Munition im Meer, Project number 03F0747A, B, C).

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The reviewer JB and handling Editor declared their shared affiliation.

References

Achtnich, C., Sieglen, U., Knackmuss, H. J., and Lenke, H. (1999). Irreversible binding of biologically reduced 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene to soil. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 18, 2416–2423. doi: 10.1002/etc.5620181106

REVIEW article

Spread, Behavior, and Ecosystem Consequences of Conventional Munitions Compounds in Coastal Marine Waters

Introduction

Chemicals in Conventional Munitions Found in the Sea, and Scale of the Problem

Global Distribution and Local Mapping

Corrosion of Munitions Housings and Release of Explosives

Dissolution of Munition Compounds

Solubility

Dissolution Kinetics

Field Studies and Detection

Organic MC

Metals

Transformation and Mineralization

TNT Transformation

TNT Mineralization

RDX and HMX Transformation and Mineralization

Photolysis

Fenton Reaction

Sorption

TNT

TNT Transformation Products

RDX and HMX

Toxicity

Conclusions and Outlook for Future Work

Author Contributions

Funding

Conflict of Interest Statement

References

People also looked at