Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Skills development and structural change: Possibilities for and limitations of redressing structural racial inequalities in South Africa

  • Published:
International Review of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Improving structural racial equality for historically-disadvantaged Black South Africans, including low-skilled and unemployed adults and youths, is a pertinent challenge for the South African government during the ongoing transition from apartheid capitalism to post-apartheid capitalism. Within the framework of the National Skills Development Strategy (NSDS), the introduction of “learnerships” and “learning programmes”, which include structured learning programmes, learnerships, apprenticeships and skills programmes, has had some impact. But emerging theoretical perspectives assert that apartheid structural racial inequalities persist and that structural reform is imperative. Opposing positions translate into two perspectives on social transition: either capitalism can be de-racialised, or capitalism in South Africa should be dismantled in order to de-racialise it. After a review of relevant literature and governmental documents, the author identifies five structural and pedagogical barriers as likely causes for low completion rates of skills development courses and concludes that structural reform needs more favourable political and economic conditions in order to be successful.

Résumé

Développement des compétences et réforme structurelle : possibilités et limites dans la réduction des inégalités raciales structurelles en Afrique du Sud – Améliorer l’égalité raciale structurelle pour les Sud-Africains noirs, traditionnellement défavorisés et constitués en majorité de jeunes et d’adultes sans emploi et peu qualifiés, est un important défi pour le gouvernement sud-africain actuel lors de cette transition du capitalisme de l’apartheid à un capitalisme post-apartheid. Dans le cadre de la stratégie nationale de développement des compétences (NSDS), l’introduction de « groupes d’apprentissage » et de « programmes éducatifs » , comprenant des programmes d’apprentissage structuré, l’apprentissage alterné en groupes, l’apprentissage professionnel et des programmes de qualification, a obtenu un certain nombre de résultats. Mais les nouveaux points de vue théoriques affirment que les inégalités raciales inhérentes aux structures de l’apartheid persistent et qu’une réforme structurelle est indispensable. Les positions opposées se traduisent par deux visions de la transition sociale : d’un côté le capitalisme peut être déracialisé, de l’autre le capitalisme sud-africain doit être démantelé pour être déracialisé. Après un examen de la documentation afférente et des documents officiels, l’auteure identifie cinq obstacles structurels et pédagogiques comme les causes probables des faibles taux d’achèvement obtenus par les cours de développement des compétences; elle conclut que pour réussir cette réforme structurelle, des conditions politiques et économiques plus favorables sont nécessaires.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The word “structural” in the term structural racial inequality refers to the idea that racial inequality was etched into all apartheid political and economic structures.

  2. In this article I use “post-apartheid capitalism” for easy reference to “capitalism in a post-apartheid society”.

  3. S. J. Terreblanche is among the analysts who have used both “representative democracy” and “liberal democratic capitalism” to characterise South Africa’s democracy. The differences and similarities between these terms are not always clear. For the purposes of the discussion here, I have not attempted to delve into, or derive, the author’s understandings of these different characterisations, but worked within his general assertion that through the 1994 election, democratic institutions, policies and procedures have been established.

  4. Thabo Mbeki declared his “two nations thesis” in his address to the National Council of Provinces on 11 November 2003, arguing that South Africa was characterised by two parallel economies, the First and the Second. He described these as follows, “The First Economy is modern, produces the bulk of our country’s wealth, and is integrated within the global economy. The Second Economy (or the Marginalised Economy) is characterised by underdevelopment, contributes little to the GDP, contains a big percentage of our population […] and is incapable of self-generated growth and development” (Mbeki 2003).

  5. The Basic Income Grant (BIG) is a form of social assistance paid by the government to all vulnerable South Africans. For further information, see DSD (2002).

  6. “The Department of Manpower (DoM) was supposedly in charge of co-ordinating all matters relating to the training of workers in the private sector. However, there were separate manpower departments in each of the nominally independent homelands. In addition, the administration of training for local authorities, the public sector and some parastatals were handled by these structures independently of the DoM” (Kraak 2004a, p. 51).

  7. The National Skills Development Strategy (NSDS) was divided into two phases: NSDS I (2001–2005); NSDS II (2005–2010). In the meantime, NSDS III (2011–2016) has been implemented.

  8. Established in the Skills Development Act in 1998, the National Skills Fund (NSF) is is a fund located within the Department of Labour. The Sector Education and Training Authorities (SETAs) are regional branches of a vocational skills training organisation in South Africa, responsible for managing and creating learnerships, internships, unit-based skills programmes, and apprenticeships within their jurisdiction.

  9. Learnerships, discussed in more detail later on in this paper, are fixed-term legal contracts between a learner, an employer and a training provider. The scheme of learnerships (2001–2005) was followed by the scheme of learning programmes (2005–2007) which include structured learning programmes, learnerships, apprenticeships and skills programmes.

  10. The five objectives of the National Skills Development Strategy II (2005–2010) referred to here are (1) Prioritising and communicating critical skills for sustainable growth, development and equity; (2) Promoting and accelerating quality training for all in the workplace; (3) Promoting employability and sustainable livelihoods through skills development; (4) Assisting designated groups, including new entrants to participate in accredited work, integrated learning and work-based programmes to acquire critical skills to enter the labour market and self-employment; and (5) Improving the quality and relevance of provision. These have been modified and changed from the objectives of the National Skills Development Strategy I (2001–2005).

  11. AET stands for Adult Education and Training.

  12. Shoprite and Checkers are South Africa’s two biggest food retailers.

  13. In the third quarter of 2013 Statistics South Africa established the unemployment rate at 24.7 per cent of a total population of 51.8 million according to the Population Census 2011. See http://beta2.statssa.gov.za/, accessed 15 January 2014.

  14. The Accelerated Shared Growth Initiative for South Africa (ASGI-SA) was implemented by the South African government in 2006 to address the second economy as identified by then-President Mbeki in 2003. See footnote 4 for further explanation.

References

  • Adler, G., & Webster, E. (2001). Unions, democracy, and economic liberalization. In J. K. Coetzee, et al. (Eds.), Development: Theory, policy, and practice. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, N. (2003). An ordinary country; issues in transition from apartheid to democracy in South Africa. New York: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badroodien, A. (2004). Technical and vocational education provision in South Africa from 1920 to 1970. In S. McGrath, A. Badroodien, A. Kraak and L. Unwin (eds), Shifting understandings of skills in South Africa: Overcoming the historical imprint of a low skills regime. Cape Town: Human Sciences Research Council Press.

  • Benjamin, P. (2006) Beyond “lean” social democracy: Labour law and the challenge of social protection. Transformation 60. Accessed 22 November 2013 from http://www.transformation.ukzn.ac.za/index.php/transformation/article/view/964/779.

  • Bhorat, H., Lundall, P., & Rospabe, S. (2002). The South African labour market in economic and legislative considerations. Employment Paper 2002/32. Geneva: International Labour Organisation (ILO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhorat, H., & Cassim, R. (2004). The challenge of growth, employment and poverty in the South African economy since democracy: An exploratory review of selected issues. Development Southern Africa, 21(1), 7–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, P. (2000). Elite transition: From apartheid to neo-liberalism in South Africa. Pietermaritzburg, South Africa: Pluto Press; University of Natal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, P. (2011a). What is radical in neo-liberal-Nationalist South Africa? Review of Radical Political Economics, 43(3), 354–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, P. (2011b). South African splinters: From “elite transition” to “small-a alliances”. Review of African Political Economy, 38(127), 113–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, C. (2007). Making a difference. Mail & Guardian 31 October. Accessed 31 December 2013 from http://mg.co.za/article/2007-10-31-making-a-difference.

  • Desjardins, R., Rubenson, K., & Milana, M. (2006). Unequal chances to participate in adult learning: International perspectives. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dlamini, J. (2011). We now know: Reform, revolution and race in post-apartheid South Africa. Transformation: Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa, 75, 36–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DOL (Department of Labour). (1981). Manpower Training Act. Pretoria: Department of Labour.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOL (Department of Labour). (1998). Skills Development Act 1998. Pretoria: Department of Labour.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOL (Department of Labour). (2001). National skills development strategy (NSDS) 2001–2005. Pretoria: Department of Labour.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOL (Department of Labour). (2003). National skills development strategy: Implementation report. Pretoria: Department of Labour.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOL (Department of Labour). (2004). National skills development strategy: Implementation report. Pretoria: Department of Labour.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOL (Department of Labour). (2005). National skills development strategy: Implementation report. Pretoria: Department of Labour.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOL (Department of Labour). (2006a). National skills development strategy (NSDS) 2005–2010. Pretoria: Department of Labour.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOL (Department of Labour). (2006b). National skills development strategy: Implementation report. Pretoria: Department of Labour.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOL (Department of Labour). (2007a). National skills development strategy: Implementation report. Pretoria: Department of Labour.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOL (Department of Labour). (2007b). State of skills in South Africa 2006/07. Pretoria: Department of Labour.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOL (Department of Labour). (2008). National skills development strategy: Implementation report. Pretoria: Department of Labour.

    Google Scholar 

  • DPRU (Development Planning Research Unit). (2010). Income and non-income inequality in post-apartheid South Africa: What are the drivers and possible policy interventions. Cape Town: Development Planning Research Unit, University of Cape Town.

    Google Scholar 

  • DSD (Department of Social Development). (2002). Transforming the present – protecting the future: Report of the Committee of Inquiry into a comprehensive system of social security for South Africa. Pretoria: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dube, O., Hausmann, R. & Rodrik, D. (2007). South Africa: Identifying the binding constraint on shared growth. CID South Africa project, Harvard University.

  • Ferguson, J. (2009). The uses of neo-liberalism. Antipode, 41(S1), 166–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelb, S. (2003). Inequality in South Africa: Nature, causes and responses. Johannesburg: The EDGE Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorz, A. (1973). Socialism and revolution. NewHaven: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grawitzky, R. (2007). SETAs – A vehicle for the skills revolution? An external report commissioned the Development Policy Research Unit (DPRU) of the University of Cape Town (UCT). Cape Town: UCT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groener, Z. (1997). Adult education and training in the South African transition (1990 to 1994). A study of policymaking. Unpublished PhD Dissertation.

  • Groener, Z. (2000). The political and economic contexts of adult education and training in South Africa. In S. A. Indabawa, A. Oduaran, T. Afrik, & S. Walters (Eds.), The state of adult and continuing education in Africa (pp. 161–177). Windhoek: University of Namibia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, A. (2005). Season of hope. South Africa/Canada: University of Kwazulu-Natal Press/International Development Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • HRSDC/CMEC (Human Resources Development Canada/Council of Ministers of Education Canada) (1997). Survey of trends in adult education and training in Canada. Report of Canada in preparation for Convintea V, 1997. Accessed 15 January 2014 from http://publications.cmec.ca/international/adulted-en.stm.

  • Kraak, A. (2004a). Training policies under late apartheid: The historical imprint of a low skills regime. In S. McGrath, A. Badroodien, A. Kraak, & L. Unwin (Eds.), Shifting understandings of skills in South Africa: Overcoming the historical imprint of a low skills regime (pp. 46–70). Cape Town: Human Sciences Research Council Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraak, A. (2004b). An overview of South African human resources development. Cape Town: HSRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraak, A. (2005). Human resources development and the skills crisis in South Africa: The need for a multi-pronged strategy. Journal of Education and Work, 18(3), 57–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leite, P., McKinley, T. & Osorio, R. (2006). The post-apartheid evolution of earnings inequality in South Africa 19952004. Brazil: United Nations Development Programme International Poverty Centre.

  • Leibrandt, M., et al. (2005). Measuring changes in South African inequality and poverty using 1996 and 2001 census data. Cape Town: University of Cape Town, Centre for Social Science Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, G. (2001). Learning in the 21st century: Key issues and questions. Background paper for the National Roundtable on Learning, March 2001, Edmonton, AB. Accessed 19 January 2014 from http://www.cprn.org/doc.cfm?doc=191&l=en.

  • Magubane, Z. (2004). The revolution betrayed? Globalization, neo-liberalism, and the post-apartheid state. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 103(4), 657–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marais, H. (1998). South Africa. Limits to change: The political economy of transition. London/New York/Cape Town: Zed Books/University of Cape Town.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marais, H. (2001). South Africa: Limits to change: The political economy of transition. 2nd, rev. and expand new ed. London/Cape Town: Zed Books/University of Cape Town Press.

  • Marais, H. (2011). South Africa pushed to the limits: The political economy of change. Claremont: University of Cape Town Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maserumule, M. (2011). Politics of transition in South Africa and the post-1994 democratic state. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 47(3), 301–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, J. (Ed.). (2000). Poverty and inequality in South Africa: Meeting the challenge. London/New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, M., & Altman, M. (2005). South Africa’s economic development trajectory: implications for skills development. Journal of Education and Work, 18(1), 33–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mbeki, T. (2003). Address by President Mbeki to the National Council of Provinces. Accessed 19 January 2014 from http://www.e-tools.co.za/newsbrief/2003/news1112.txt .

  • McGrath, S. (2004). The shifting understandings of skills in South Africa since industrialisation. In S. McGrath, S., A. Badroodien, A. Kraak, and L. Unwin, L. (eds), Shifting understandings of skills in South Africa: Overcoming the historical imprint of a low regime (pp. 1–19). Cape Town: Human Sciences Research Council Press.

  • McGivney, V. (1999). Returning women: Their training and employment choices and needs. Leicester, UK: NIACE. (ERIC Document ED 429 205).

  • Mhone, G. (2000). Enclavity and constrained labour absorptive opacity in Southern African countries. ILO/SAMAT Policy Paper Series no. 12. Geneva: International Labour Organization (ILO).

  • Michie, J., & Padayachee, V. (1997). The political economy of South Africa’s transition. London: The Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, P. & Falk, I. (2000). Seniors online: Online literacy and learning by senior citizens in rural centres. Australia: Adult Literacy and Numeracy Australian Research Consortium. (ERIC Reproduction Document. ED 457 399).

  • Myers, K. & de Broucker, P. (2006). Too many left behind: Canada’s Adult Education and Training System. Research Report W/34 Work Network.

  • Office of the President. (1994). White paper on reconstruction and development. Cape Town: South African Government Printers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the President. (1996). Growth, employment and redistribution: A macro-economic strategy. Cape Town: South African Government Printers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the President. (1997). Green paper skills development strategy for economic and employment growth in South Africa. Cape Town: South African Government Printers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the President. (1998a). Skills Development Act. Cape Town: South African Government Printers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the President. (1998b). Skills Levies Act. Cape Town: South African Government Printers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orkin, M. (1995). Living in South Africa. Selected findings of the 1995 October household survey. Pretoria: Central Statistics Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2002). Thematic review of adult learning: Canada. Background report. Paris: OECD. Summary available from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/51/32/1940307.pdf.

  • Pilger, J. (1998). Hidden agendas. London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J., & Ferguson, C. (2003). Canada’s innovation strategy and lifelong learning: Facilitating adult learning in Canada. Fredericton, NB: University of New Brunswick, Department of Extension and Summer Session.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, A. (1995). Sustainable democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saul, J. (1992). Structural reform: a model for the revolutionary transformation of South Africa. Transformation, 20.

  • Saul, J. (2010). Is socialism still an alternative? Studies in Political Economy, 86, 167–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saul, J. (2011). ‘Structural reform’ – the concept continues. Transformation, 75, 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saul, J., & Gelb, S. (1986). The crisis in South Africa. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seekings, J. (2007). Poverty and inequality after apartheid. Cape Town: University of Cape Town, Centre for Social Science Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seekings, J., Leibrandt, M., & Nattrass, N. (2004). Income inequality after apartheid. Cape Town: University of Cape Town, Centre for Social Science Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seekings, J., & Nattrass, N. (2005). Class, race, and inequality in South Africa. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics South Africa. (1995). Income and expenditure survey (IES). Pretoria: Statistics South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics South Africa (2007). Labour force survey. Historical Revision September Series 2000–2007. Statistical Release P0210. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa. Accessed 31 December 2013 from http://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/P0210/P0210September2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007.pdf.

  • Terreblanche, S. J. (2002). A history of inequality in South Africa, 1652–2002. Pietermaritzburg: University of Natal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (2003). South Africa human development report 2003. The challengeof sustainable development in South Africa: Unlocking people’s creativity. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press. Accessed 24 November 2013 from http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/nationalreports/africa/southafrica/south_africa_2003_en.pdf.

  • U.S. Department of Education (1998). Adult education participation decisions and barriers: Review of conceptual frameworks and empirical studies (Working Paper No. 98–10). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.

  • Webster, E., & Adler, G. (1999). Toward a class compromise in South Africa’s “double transition”: Bargained liberalisation and the consolidation of democracy. Politics & Society, 27, 347–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpe, H. (1988). Race, class & the apartheid state. London: Currey.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zelda Groener.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Groener, Z. Skills development and structural change: Possibilities for and limitations of redressing structural racial inequalities in South Africa. Int Rev Educ 59, 723–749 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-014-9399-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-014-9399-z

Keywords

Navigation