STUDENT INTERNSHIP (PRACTICUM) PROGRAM EVALUATION
UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS
COLLEGE OF COMMERCE AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Dear 4th Year BSBA Students,

Greetings! We would like to solicit your assistance in evaluating the implementation process of the Student Internship Program (SIP) or Practicum Program of Fourth Year BSBA Students of the College of Commerce and Business Administration for the Academic Year 2016-2017 (rendered in Special Term 2016), with the purpose  of identifying areas for improvement as well as program strengths. Your participation in this survey will help us draw recommendation and formulate action plans as they relate to identified areas of concern.

Thank you for taking time to complete this survey.

The Coordinator, Student Internship/Practicum Program

Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Name
Section/Major *
Sex *
Company & Position *
Industry (choose one) *
Tick the circle corresponding to your choice, as follows :
ORIENTATION PROCESS *
5 = Strongly Agree
4 = Agree
3 = Neutral
2 = Disagree
1 = Strongly Disagree
1. The orientation was conducted in a timely manner and informative
2. The information provided during the orientation was adequate
3. The orientation was conducted by the Student Internship Program/Practicum Coordinator
4. The orientation was conducted by other speakers other than the SIP/Practicum Coordinator.
5. Instructions were clear and easy to understand
6. The orientation was done on a “per program” basis
Other comments about the orientation process:
DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS *
5 = Strongly Agree
4 = Agree
3 = Neutral
2 = Disagree
1 = Strongly Disagree
7. Documents (and templates) necessary/required were made available in the website
8. Information posted in the website were up-to-date (latest available)
9. The following documents were reasonable enough to be required : 9.1. Memorandum of Agreement
9.2. Endorsement Letter
9.3. Student’s Waiver
9.4. Parents’ Permission and Waiver
9.5. Company Acceptance
9.6. Photocopy of Parents’/Guardian’s ID showing signatures
9.7. Medical Certificate
10. The number of copies for each document was reasonable for the purpose discussed
11. Deadline for submission of documents was reasonably set (10 calendar days from the start of practicum)
Other comments about documentary requirements:
PROGRAM PROPER *
5 = Strongly Agree
4 = Agree
3 = Neutral
2 = Disagree
1 = Strongly Disagree
12. The list of companies/institutions provided was helpful in identifying which companies/institutions to apply to.
13. The process of approval of companies not included in the Top 1000 Corporation list (i.e., seek endorsement from at least 2 faculty members from the area) is reasonable
14. My SIP or Practicum tasks assigned were relevant to my degree program
15. The 300-hour requirement is reasonable
16. The practicum is best rendered during summer/Special Term break
17. The PracFolio is a necessary document to reflect the activities/tasks I performed in my practicum assignment
18. Outline of the Practicum Summary (part of the PracFolio) was properly explained
19. Contents of the PracFolio were properly explained
20. The deadline for the submission of the journal (15 calendar days from end of SIP/practicum) is reasonable
Other comments about program proper:
ADVISER CONCERNS *
5 = Strongly Agree
4 = Agree
3 = Neutral
2 = Disagree
1 = Strongly Disagree
21. I was able to know my practicum adviser the earliest possible time from my submission of required documents
22. I think it is important that I have knowledge of my adviser’s date and time of visit
23. My adviser was accommodating and helpful in resolving my OJT concerns
24. I was visited by my adviser in my SIP/Practicum assignment
25. I was visited by my adviser during my SIP/Practicum assignment
26. My practicum adviser is from the Department of my program of study (i.e., marketing majors should be assigned faculty from the Marketing Dept, etc.)
Other comments about adviser concerns:
FEEDBACK MECHANISM *
5 = Strongly Agree
4 = Agree
3 = Neutral
2 = Disagree
1 = Strongly Disagree
27. The grading system was explained clearly
28. There is a need to explain the areas on which the student will be evaluated (content of the evaluation form)
29. There is a need for the adviser to discuss the company evaluation results to the student-advisee
Other comments about feedback mechanism:
*
5 = Strongly Agree
4 = Agree
3 = Neutral
2 = Disagree
1 = Strongly Disagree
30. Through my practicum experience, I was able to connect the theories I learned in the classroom (textbooks and lectures) to their application in the real world of work
31. My overall assessment of the SIP/Practicum process is that it was done in a relevant and logical manner
32. My overall assessment is that the SIP/Practicum should really be part of the curriculum of my degree program
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
Google Forms