ENG1101(J2) Peer Review: Podcast Script
Instructions:  (Team Exercise)

1. Sit together in your assigned teams. Access each other team's draft in the Google Drive folder: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BwpDKl0hGgNRdy1rUlBUWVRRMW8?usp=sharing

2. Scan your team's draft first for your impression of the essay: conventions, paragraphs, sentences. Within in your team, discuss and answer the first three questions on the form below.

3. As a team, read the script carefully, making notes, comments, and suggestions using the Google comments function. Don’t worry too much about the team's grammar and punctuation unless you notice a distracting error that is made repeatedly. Make sure to note the following:

(a) the claim about the efficacy of the interface for completing the user’s desired task, (b) reference to the team's user research and analysis, (c) the larger claim about the significance of incorporating sound into this and similar interfaces, (d) if the script incorporates all of the team members and identifies each speaker, (e) if the script "sounds" like you are having a conversation; and (f) if the script identifies where it will use sound to develop the story.


Make sure to mark the strongest and weakest sections of the essay as it is now.

4. Answer the rest of the questions below (Q. 4 - Q10).

5. At the bottom of your peers' draft, summarize your team's comments. Then suggest the one or two most important elements your peers should revise before they begin recording their podcast.

5. When you're finished, share your feedback with each other in the remaining time and clarify comments which may be unclear to you.
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
1. Team Number *
Help your colleagues find your comments on the peer review form.
2. Has the team included their name, the date, and a title for their document?
List any
3. After a scan of the script, do you know (a)  the scenario that requires the sound or speech interface, (b) the team's concept, and (c) the user persona and their need for this interface.  Write what's missing below.
These pieces of information should be central to the script and easily identified
4. Can you locate the two claims (the specific and larger claim) that are to be developed in this podcast?
If so, make one suggestion for revising each claim for clarity, contestability, assertiveness, significance.
5. Has the context (problem statement) for the claim been succinctly presented?
Remember that the team only needs to give enough information to allow the reasonably knowledgeable reader to make sense of the claim(s).
6. What evidence from their reseach does the team provide (bullet points and shorthand are fine) below. Is the evidence clearly relevant to the claim?
Ask a question the evidence raises for you, based on what you've read of the claim and the context
7. Have all speakers been "used" in the script?
8. Has each speaker been identified in the script?
9. Has the team identified where it will use sound clips and what those sound clips are?
9a If the sound clips have been identified, do you think the clips creatively advance the story the team is trying to weave?
Provide a rationale for your team's opinion.
10. Given the audience, how well does the script balance the technical nature of the material with the goal of a conversational tone?
If there are technical terms and concepts that have been used, but not simplified, please specify.
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
Google Forms