A spat over language erupts at the World Bank
But arguments over an excess of conjunctions may miss the point
By THE DATA TEAM
A WAR of words has flared up at the World Bank. Paul Romer, its new chief economist, has been stripped of control of the research division. An internal memo claimed that the change was to bring the operations department and research arm closer together. But many think that it was because Mr Romer clashed with staff over the Bank’s writing style. He had demanded shorter, better-written reports. In the most recent spat, Mr Romer questioned the excessive use of the word “and”. He proclaimed that he would not clear a final report for publication if “and” made up more than 2.6% of the text. His tenacious approach had, it is said, rubbed some employees the wrong way.
More from Graphic detail
Is America’s weed habit dangerous?
Our analysis of the data
Hong Kong smothers dissent ahead of the Tiananmen anniversary
Data show the extent to which repression has grown
Despite flaws, South Africa’s democracy is stronger than its neighbours’
EIU’s democracy index shows just how bad the situation in Africa is