Scientific event -- Scientometrics


1	Timestamp	1. How relevant is an event recommendation service to you?	2. If you think of the best conference in your area of research, what are the main criteria that make it the best conference? (multiple choices are possible)	3. Which three aspects do you consider most relevant when choosing a conference to submit your research contribution?	4. Which three aspects from the following list do you consider most important for your community?	5. What other criteria do you consider while choosing a scientific event?	6. To what extent do you think the aspects listed above can indicate the overall quality of scientific events, e.g. leading to a quality-based ranking?	7. What factors do you consider when deciding to re-participate in an event?	8. How much does the reputation of a conference influence your decision to participate to its co-located events (e.g. workshops, tutorials, challenges)?	9. How much does the location of an event and the associated travel costs influence your participation?	10. What is the average number of reviews (including meta-reviews) you receive from the best conferences in your area of research?	11. What is the average length of reviews by lines of text, you receive from the best conferences in your area of research?	12. While participating in a conference, how important is the schedule and the length of breaks for you to do networking and to establish contacts?	13. Please name three (or more) conferences which are known as the best conferences in your area of research:	14. If a service for recommending scientific events based on their quality were available, how frequently would you use it?	15. How do you find venues for submitting your research contribution?	16. In what roles have you participated in scientific events in your community?	17. Do you have any other comments or questions?	[Submissions]	[Location]	In the range of 1 to 100, how you grade relevance of the following metrics to the person roles above

2	23/06/2017 17:40:58	Highly relevant	High quality of reviews, Well-known publisher, High-profile keynote speakers, Low acceptance rate, High number of citations to the accepted papers of the previous years	Publisher, Topical focus, Acceptance rate	Publisher, Reputation of the organizers, Acceptance rate	Location of the conference	Very much	Networking possibility	To some extent	To some extent	4	between 10 and 30 lines	Very much	www, ISWC, ESWC	For some cases	Well-know target events existing over a long period of time	organiser, reviewer, author
3	23/06/2017 17:52:32	Somewhat relevant	High quality of reviews, Organized by reputed people, High-profile keynote speakers, Low acceptance rate, Having high quality co-located events, High number of citations to the accepted papers of the previous years	Publisher, Topical focus, Registration fee, Acceptance rate, Long-standing events	Review process, Registration fee, Acceptance rate		To some extent	Networking possibility, Topical focus, Co-located events, Acceptance rate	Very much	To some extent	4	between 10 and 30 lines	To some extent	WWW, ISWC, ESWC	Very much	Well-know target events existing over a long period of time	organiser, reviewer, author, participant, author without participation, participant without a paper
4	23/06/2017 21:02:38	Somewhat relevant	High quality of reviews, Low acceptance rate, High number of citations to the accepted papers of the previous years	Review process, Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, Yahoo, Acceptance rate	Review process, Reputation of the organizers, Acceptance rate		To some extent	Networking possibility	Very much	Rather little	4	more than 50 lines	Rather little	WWW ESWC ISWC	Very much	Well-know target events existing over a long period of time	organiser, reviewer, author, participant
5	24/06/2017 00:31:00	Somewhat relevant	High quality of reviews, High-profile keynote speakers, Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, IBM, SAP, High number of citations to the accepted papers of the previous years	Topical focus	Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, Yahoo		Rather little	Topical focus	Rather little	To some extent	4	between 10 and 30 lines	Rather little	www eswc iswc	For some cases	Search by keywords using browsers	reviewer, author
6	24/06/2017 10:26:46	Highly relevant	High quality of reviews, Well-known publisher, Organized by reputed people, High number of citations to the accepted papers of the previous years	Reputation of the organizers, Topical focus, Acceptance rate	Review process, Reputation of the organizers, Acceptance rate	Networking possibility	To some extent	Networking possibility, Acceptance rate, Reputation in the community	Very much	To some extent	3	between 10 and 30 lines	To some extent	ISWC, ESWC, WWW	For some cases	Search by keywords using browsers, Mailing list notifications, Well-know target events existing over a long period of time, Social media	organiser, reviewer, author
7	27/06/2017 16:35:08	A bit relevant	High quality of reviews, Flexibility in accepting submissions in different formats/styles	Review process, Publisher, Submissions formats/styles	Review process, Submissions formats/styles, Registration fee	Is it written for the Web and welcomes different types of contributions and interactions?	To some extent	Topical focus, Co-located events	Very much	To some extent	3	less than 10 lines	To some extent	Call for Linked Research	For some cases	Mailing list notifications	organiser, reviewer, author, participant, author without participation, invited speaker
8	27/06/2017 16:43:22	A bit relevant	High quality of reviews, High-profile keynote speakers, Topical focus (focus on recent and innovative topics in a relevant research area), High number of citations to the accepted papers of the previous years	Review process, Topical focus, Registration fee	Review process, Topical focus, Registration fee		To some extent	Networking possibility, Topical focus, Reputation of an event’s keynote speakers	To some extent	Very much	2	less than 10 lines	Very much		For some cases	Search by keywords using browsers, Mailing list notifications, Social media	author, participant
9	27/06/2017 17:02:07	A bit relevant	High quality of reviews, Organized by reputed people, Topical focus (focus on recent and innovative topics in a relevant research area), Having high quality co-located events, High number of citations to the accepted papers of the previous years	Reputation of the organizers, Topical focus, Long-standing events			Very much	Networking possibility, Topical focus	Very much	To some extent	3	between 10 and 30 lines	Very much	WWW, ISWC, ESWC, WIMS	For some cases	Well-know target events existing over a long period of time	organiser, reviewer, author
10	27/06/2017 17:07:56	A bit relevant	High quality of reviews, Organized by reputed people, Topical focus (focus on recent and innovative topics in a relevant research area), High number of citations to the accepted papers of the previous years	Reputation of the organizers, Topical focus, Long-standing events	Publisher, Reputation of the organizers, Topical focus	Recommendations by peers/seniors	Rather little	Networking possibility, Topical focus	To some extent	Rather little	3	between 10 and 30 lines	To some extent	ISWC, ESWC, WWW, WI	Rather rarely	Mailing list notifications, Well-know target events existing over a long period of time	reviewer, author, participant without a paper
11	27/06/2017 17:08:16	A bit relevant	High quality of reviews, Organized by reputed people	Publisher, Reputation of the organizers, Topical focus	Review process, Reputation of the organizers, Topical focus	location	To some extent	Networking possibility, Topical focus	To some extent	To some extent	3	between 10 and 30 lines	To some extent	WIPSCE, SIGCSE, ISSEP	For some cases	Search by keywords using browsers, Well-know target events existing over a long period of time, Personal contact	participant, author without participation, participant without a paper
12	27/06/2017 17:08:27	Highly relevant	High quality of reviews, Organized by reputed people, High-profile keynote speakers, Flexibility in accepting submissions in different formats/styles, High number of citations to the accepted papers of the previous years	Reputation of the organizers, Topical focus, Long-standing events			To some extent	Networking possibility, Topical focus, Reputation of an event’s keynote speakers	Very much	To some extent	3	between 10 and 30 lines	To some extent	TPDL, VLDB, WWW	Very much	Mailing list notifications, Well-know target events existing over a long period of time, http://www.confsearch.org/	reviewer, author, participant, author without participation
13	27/06/2017 17:29:06	Somewhat relevant	Organized by reputed people, High-profile keynote speakers, Topical focus (focus on recent and innovative topics in a relevant research area)	Publisher, Reputation of the organizers, Registration fee	Publisher, Reputation of the organizers, Registration fee	Conference Venue (city)	Very much	Networking possibility, Topical focus, Reputation of an event’s keynote speakers	Very much	To some extent	3	between 10 and 30 lines	To some extent		For some cases	Search by keywords using browsers, Using conferencealerts.com	author, participant	No
14	27/06/2017 17:44:25	Highly relevant	High quality of reviews, High-profile keynote speakers, Low acceptance rate, Topical focus (focus on recent and innovative topics in a relevant research area), Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, IBM, SAP	Review process, Publisher, Acceptance rate	Review process, Publisher, Topical focus		Very much	Networking possibility, Acceptance rate, Reputation of an event’s keynote speakers	Very much	To some extent	3	between 10 and 30 lines	Very much		Very much	Search by keywords using browsers, Well-know target events existing over a long period of time, Personal contact	organiser, reviewer, author
15	27/06/2017 20:50:05	Somewhat relevant	High-profile keynote speakers, Topical focus (focus on recent and innovative topics in a relevant research area), High number of citations to the accepted papers of the previous years	Publisher, Topical focus, Long-standing events	Topical focus		To some extent	Topical focus	To some extent	Rather little	2	between 10 and 30 lines	To some extent	American Control, ASME DSCC, IEEE CDC	For some cases	Search by keywords using browsers	author
16	28/06/2017 08:39:05	Somewhat relevant	High quality of reviews, Topical focus (focus on recent and innovative topics in a relevant research area)	Review process, Publisher, Topical focus, Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, Yahoo, Co-located events, Registration fee, Acceptance rate	Review process, Publisher, Topical focus		To some extent	Networking possibility, Topical focus, Reputation of an event’s keynote speakers	Very much	To some extent	3	between 10 and 30 lines	Very much		For some cases	Mailing list notifications, Well-know target events existing over a long period of time, Personal contact	author, participant, participant without a paper
17	28/06/2017 09:36:26	A bit relevant	Low acceptance rate	Acceptance rate	Review process, Acceptance rate	Easy to travel to	Rather little	Acceptance rate	Very much	Very much	3	between 10 and 30 lines	Rather little	ECAI, IJCAI,AAMAS	For some cases	Well-know target events existing over a long period of time	organiser, reviewer, author
18	28/06/2017 10:04:10	Somewhat relevant	High quality of reviews, Low acceptance rate, High number of citations to the accepted papers of the previous years	Review process, Publisher, Acceptance rate	Review process, Reputation of the organizers, Acceptance rate	Topics of interest	To some extent	Networking possibility, Topical focus	Very much	To some extent	4	between 10 and 30 lines	Rather little	ICSE, WICSA, ASE	For some cases	Mailing list notifications, Well-know target events existing over a long period of time, Personal contact	organiser, reviewer, author, participant
19	28/06/2017 11:52:52	Highly relevant	High quality of reviews, Well-known publisher, Organized by reputed people, High-profile keynote speakers, Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, IBM, SAP	Review process, Publisher, Reputation of the organizers, Topical focus, Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, Yahoo	Publisher, Reputation of the organizers, Topical focus, Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, Yahoo	Timing, if I can catch it within my project time window.	To some extent	Networking possibility, Reputation of an event’s keynote speakers	Very much	To some extent	4	less than 10 lines	Very much	DAC, DATE, ISCA	Very much	Well-know target events existing over a long period of time	author, participant
20	30/06/2017 11:36:49	Somewhat relevant	Organized by reputed people, High-profile keynote speakers, Topical focus (focus on recent and innovative topics in a relevant research area)	Reputation of the organizers, Topical focus, Long-standing events	Review process, Publisher, Topical focus	Fee cost; Location	Very much	Topical focus	Very much	To some extent	4	between 10 and 30 lines	To some extent	ICRA, IROS, Opne Robotics Initiative	For some cases	Search by keywords using browsers	organiser, reviewer, author
21	30/06/2017 14:26:11	Highly relevant	High quality of reviews, Organized by reputed people, High-profile keynote speakers, Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, IBM, SAP, Having high quality co-located events, High number of citations to the accepted papers of the previous years	Review process, Reputation of the organizers, Topical focus, Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, Yahoo	Review process, Topical focus, Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, Yahoo		To some extent	Networking possibility, Reputation of an event’s keynote speakers	To some extent	Very much	5	more than 50 lines	To some extent	VLDB, ICDE, SIGMOD	For some cases	Well-know target events existing over a long period of time	reviewer, author, participant, author without participation
22	30/06/2017 16:16:32	Highly relevant	High quality of reviews, Well-known publisher, Organized by reputed people, Topical focus (focus on recent and innovative topics in a relevant research area)	Review process, Publisher, Topical focus	Publisher, Reputation of the organizers, Topical focus	Reachability	Very much	Networking possibility, Topical focus	To some extent	Very much	4	between 10 and 30 lines	Very much	SIGIR, SIGKDD, VLDB	For some cases	Search by keywords using browsers, Mailing list notifications, Well-know target events existing over a long period of time	author, participant
23	30/06/2017 18:11:54	A bit relevant	High quality of reviews, Organized by reputed people, Low acceptance rate, High number of citations to the accepted papers of the previous years	Review process, Reputation of the organizers, Topical focus	Review process, Reputation of the organizers, Acceptance rate, I actually have no idea what "my community" thinks about this question	Location	To some extent	Networking possibility, Quality of the presentations	To some extent	To some extent	4	between 10 and 30 lines	To some extent	WWW, IJCAI, KR, ISWC, ESWC	Not at all	Mailing list notifications, Personal contact	organiser, reviewer, author, participant, author without participation, participant without a paper, keynote speaker, metadata chair, proceedings chair	No.
24	30/06/2017 19:49:19	Somewhat relevant	High quality of reviews, Organized by reputed people, Topical focus (focus on recent and innovative topics in a relevant research area), High number of citations to the accepted papers of the previous years	Review process, Topical focus, Acceptance rate, Long-standing events	Review process, Topical focus, Registration fee, Acceptance rate	Location	To some extent	Networking possibility, Topical focus	Very much	Very much	3	between 10 and 30 lines	Rather little	ISWC, WWW, AAAI, ICSC	Very much	Mailing list notifications, Well-know target events existing over a long period of time	reviewer, author
25	30/06/2017 19:58:14	Highly relevant	Organized by reputed people, High-profile keynote speakers, Low acceptance rate, Topical focus (focus on recent and innovative topics in a relevant research area), High number of citations to the accepted papers of the previous years	Topical focus, Acceptance rate	Review process, Topical focus, Acceptance rate		To some extent	Networking possibility, Topical focus, Reputation of an event’s keynote speakers	To some extent	To some extent	3	between 10 and 30 lines	Very much	WIMS, ISWC, WWW	For some cases	Mailing list notifications, Well-know target events existing over a long period of time	participant
26	30/06/2017 20:02:20	Highly relevant	High quality of reviews, Well-known publisher, Organized by reputed people, High-profile keynote speakers, Topical focus (focus on recent and innovative topics in a relevant research area), Having high quality co-located events, High number of citations to the accepted papers of the previous years	Review process, Publisher, Topical focus	Publisher, Topical focus, Acceptance rate		To some extent	Networking possibility, Topical focus, Co-located events	Very much	To some extent	3	more than 50 lines	To some extent	WWW, NAACL, ACL, COLING, AAAI	Very much	Search by keywords using browsers, Mailing list notifications, Well-know target events existing over a long period of time, Social media, Personal contact	reviewer, author
27	01/07/2017 00:14:00	Somewhat relevant	Well-known publisher, Organized by reputed people, High-profile keynote speakers	Publisher, Reputation of the organizers	Publisher, Reputation of the organizers, Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, Yahoo	Review response turn around	Very much	Networking possibility, Topical focus, Reputation of an event’s keynote speakers	Very much	To some extent	3	between 10 and 30 lines	To some extent	ISWC, GlobeCom, IEEE WF-IoT	For some cases	Mailing list notifications	organiser, reviewer, author, participant, keynote speaker
28	01/07/2017 01:10:28	Somewhat relevant	High quality of reviews, Well-known publisher, Organized by reputed people, High-profile keynote speakers, Topical focus (focus on recent and innovative topics in a relevant research area)	Review process, Publisher, Reputation of the organizers, Topical focus	Review process, Publisher, Reputation of the organizers, Topical focus		Very much	Networking possibility, Topical focus, Reputation of an event’s keynote speakers	Very much	Rather little	3	more than 50 lines	To some extent	kdd, mwc, iot world forum	Very much	Search by keywords using browsers, Mailing list notifications, Personal contact	participant without a paper
29	01/07/2017 08:22:16	Somewhat relevant	High quality of reviews, Well-known publisher, High number of citations to the accepted papers of the previous years	Publisher	Review process, Publisher			Networking possibility, Reputation of an event’s keynote speakers	To some extent	To some extent	5	more than 50 lines	Very much	ICASSP, WCCI, MLSP	Rather rarely	Well-know target events existing over a long period of time	organiser, reviewer, author, participant
30	01/07/2017 09:56:46	Somewhat relevant	High quality of reviews, High-profile keynote speakers, Topical focus (focus on recent and innovative topics in a relevant research area), High number of citations to the accepted papers of the previous years	Review process, Publisher, Topical focus	Review process, Topical focus, Submissions formats/styles		To some extent	Networking possibility, Topical focus	To some extent	To some extent	4	between 10 and 30 lines	Rather little	ISWC, ESWC, ICWE, EKAW, SEMANTiCS	For some cases	Mailing list notifications, Well-know target events existing over a long period of time, Personal contact, wikicfp	organiser, reviewer, author, participant, author without participation, participant without a paper
31	01/07/2017 10:07:37	Somewhat relevant	High quality of reviews, Topical focus (focus on recent and innovative topics in a relevant research area), Flexibility in accepting submissions in different formats/styles, High number of citations to the accepted papers of the previous years	Publisher, Topical focus, Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, Yahoo, Acceptance rate	Reputation of the organizers, Topical focus, Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, Yahoo, Registration fee, Acceptance rate		To some extent	Networking possibility, Topical focus	To some extent	Very much	3	less than 10 lines	To some extent		For some cases	Search by keywords using browsers, Mailing list notifications, Well-know target events existing over a long period of time, Personal contact	organiser, author, participant, author without participation, participant without a paper
32	01/07/2017 10:21:52	Somewhat relevant	High quality of reviews, Well-known publisher, Organized by reputed people, High-profile keynote speakers, Topical focus (focus on recent and innovative topics in a relevant research area), High number of citations to the accepted papers of the previous years	Publisher, Topical focus, Long-standing events	Publisher, Topical focus, citations / impact factor	Location of event	To some extent	Networking possibility, Topical focus	Very much	To some extent	3	between 10 and 30 lines	To some extent	IEEE ICC, GLOBECOM, INFOCOM	For some cases	Mailing list notifications, Well-know target events existing over a long period of time	organiser, reviewer, author, participant, author without participation, participant without a paper
33	01/07/2017 12:45:34	Highly relevant	High quality of reviews, Well-known publisher, Organized by reputed people, High-profile keynote speakers, Topical focus (focus on recent and innovative topics in a relevant research area), Flexibility in accepting submissions in different formats/styles	Review process, Publisher, Reputation of the organizers, Acceptance rate, Long-standing events	Review process, Publisher, Reputation of the organizers, Topical focus, Acceptance rate	NA	To some extent	Networking possibility, Topical focus, Reputation of an event’s keynote speakers	Very much	To some extent	3	between 10 and 30 lines	To some extent	NIPS, ICML, ICPR, Globecom,	For some cases	Well-know target events existing over a long period of time, Personal contact	organiser, reviewer, author, participant, author without participation, participant without a paper	NA
34	01/07/2017 13:53:02	Somewhat relevant	High quality of reviews, High-profile keynote speakers, Topical focus (focus on recent and innovative topics in a relevant research area), Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, IBM, SAP	Publisher, Topical focus, Long-standing events	Publisher, Topical focus, Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, Yahoo		To some extent	Networking possibility, Topical focus, Reputation of an event’s keynote speakers	To some extent	Very much	3	between 10 and 30 lines	To some extent		For some cases	Well-know target events existing over a long period of time, Personal contact	organiser, reviewer, author, participant without a paper
35	01/07/2017 15:38:46	Somewhat relevant	Well-known publisher, Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, IBM, SAP, Flexibility in accepting submissions in different formats/styles	Publisher, Reputation of the organizers, Submissions formats/styles	Publisher, Reputation of the organizers, Topical focus	location	To some extent	Networking possibility, Topical focus, Acceptance rate	To some extent	To some extent	3	between 10 and 30 lines	To some extent		Very much	Mailing list notifications, Personal contact	organiser	no
36	06/07/2017 16:31:28	Not at all relevant	Organized by reputed people, Topical focus (focus on recent and innovative topics in a relevant research area), Flexibility in accepting submissions in different formats/styles	Topical focus, Long-standing events	Review process, Topical focus	whether colleagues have published there or other interesting papers I've read	To some extent	Networking possibility, Topical focus, whether I got a paper accepted	To some extent	To some extent	4	between 10 and 30 lines	Very much	ISWC, ESWC, WWW, EKAW, SEMANTiCS,KESW	Rather rarely	Mailing list notifications, Well-know target events existing over a long period of time, Personal contact	reviewer, author, participant
37	07/07/2017 18:33:56	Highly relevant	High quality of reviews, Well-known publisher, High-profile keynote speakers, Low acceptance rate, Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, IBM, SAP, Flexibility in accepting submissions in different formats/styles, High number of citations to the accepted papers of the previous years	Review process, Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, Yahoo, Acceptance rate	Topical focus, Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, Yahoo, Acceptance rate	The location of the place, the reputation of the conference and the ability to socialize with people from the same/similar domains.	To some extent	Networking possibility, Co-located events, Acceptance rate	Very much	Very much	3	between 10 and 30 lines	Very much	VLDB, SIGMOD, ICDE, EDBT, WWW, SIGIR, SIGKDD	Very much	Mailing list notifications, Well-know target events existing over a long period of time, Social media, Personal contact	author, participant, participant without a paper	I think the impact of the research are and the conference count as well :D
38	08/07/2017 09:14:17	Somewhat relevant	High quality of reviews, Well-known publisher, Organized by reputed people, High-profile keynote speakers, High number of citations to the accepted papers of the previous years	Review process, Reputation of the organizers, Topical focus	Review process, Publisher, Reputation of the organizers		To some extent	Networking possibility, Topical focus	To some extent	To some extent	4	more than 50 lines	To some extent	SIGGRAPH, SIGGRAPH Asia, CVPR, Pacific Graphics	Very much	Search by keywords using browsers, Well-know target events existing over a long period of time, Personal contact	author, participant
39	08/07/2017 09:57:09	Somewhat relevant	Well-known publisher, Organized by reputed people, Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, IBM, SAP	Publisher, Reputation of the organizers, Topical focus	Publisher, Reputation of the organizers, Topical focus										Very much	Search by keywords using browsers, Mailing list notifications, Well-know target events existing over a long period of time, Personal contact	author, participant, author without participation, participant without a paper
40	08/07/2017 11:56:52	Not at all relevant	Organized by reputed people, High-profile keynote speakers	Reputation of the organizers, Topical focus	Reputation of the organizers, Topical focus		Very much	Networking possibility, Topical focus, Co-located events	Very much	Very much	3	between 10 and 30 lines	To some extent	SIGMOD, WWW, ICDE, KESW	Not at all	Personal contact	reviewer, author, participant
41	13/07/2017 13:20:18	Highly relevant	High quality of reviews, High-profile keynote speakers, Topical focus (focus on recent and innovative topics in a relevant research area), Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, IBM, SAP	Reputation of the organizers, Topical focus, Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, Yahoo	Topical focus, Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, Yahoo, Co-located events	Distance (which also means, the full cost of attending it)	Very much	Networking possibility, Topical focus, Reputation of an event’s keynote speakers, Distance from my University	Very much	Very much	4	between 10 and 30 lines	To some extent	WWW, JCDL, ISWC, ICSC	Very much	Search by keywords using browsers, Mailing list notifications, Well-know target events existing over a long period of time, Social media	reviewer, participant	You may be interesting for you to give a look to PaperLeap (www.paperleap.com)
42	19/07/2017 10:03:27	Highly relevant	High-profile keynote speakers, High number of citations to the accepted papers of the previous years	Reputation of the organizers, Topical focus, Long-standing events	Publisher, Reputation of the organizers, Topical focus	Location, befriended colleagues submitting/organising	To some extent	Networking possibility, personal experience during first participation	To some extent	Very much	3	between 10 and 30 lines	To some extent	ISWC, ESWC, VLDB, WI	Very much	Mailing list notifications, Personal contact, cfp-wiki	reviewer, author, participant, author without participation	You could consider the impact factor of the proceedings publications as a feature to judge the quality of a venue.
43	29/07/2017 14:36:36	Highly relevant	High-profile keynote speakers, Topical focus (focus on recent and innovative topics in a relevant research area), Flexibility in accepting submissions in different formats/styles, Having high quality co-located events	Review process, Reputation of the organizers, Topical focus	Review process, Reputation of the organizers, Submissions formats/styles		Very much	Networking possibility, Topical focus, Co-located events, Reputation of an event’s keynote speakers	To some extent	Very much	3	between 10 and 30 lines	Very much		Very much	Search by keywords using browsers, Social media	organiser, participant
44	09/09/2017 14:04:35	Somewhat relevant	High quality of reviews, Well-known publisher, High-profile keynote speakers, Topical focus (focus on recent and innovative topics in a relevant research area), Flexibility in accepting submissions in different formats/styles	Publisher, Topical focus, Long-standing events	Publisher, Reputation of the organizers, Topical focus	Number of previous attendees	To some extent	Networking possibility, Topical focus, Co-located events	Very much	Very much	3	between 10 and 30 lines	To some extent	WWW, ISWC, ESWC, JCDL	Very much	Mailing list notifications, Well-know target events existing over a long period of time, Social media	organiser, reviewer, author, participant, author without participation
45	10/10/2017 09:58:35	Highly relevant	High quality of reviews, Well-known publisher, Organized by reputed people, Low acceptance rate, Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, IBM, SAP, Having high quality co-located events	Publisher, Submissions formats/styles, Co-located events, Registration fee, Acceptance rate, Long-standing events	Review process, Publisher, Reputation of the organizers, Topical focus, Submissions formats/styles, Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, Yahoo, Co-located events, Registration fee, Acceptance rate		Very much	Networking possibility, Acceptance rate, Reputation of an event’s keynote speakers	Very much	Very much	4	between 10 and 30 lines	Very much		Very much	Search by keywords using browsers, Mailing list notifications	organiser, reviewer
46	10/10/2017 10:00:51	Somewhat relevant	Low acceptance rate, Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, IBM, SAP	Publisher, Acceptance rate	Publisher, Registration fee		To some extent	Networking possibility	Very much	Very much	3	between 10 and 30 lines	To some extent		For some cases	Mailing list notifications, Personal contact	organiser, reviewer, author, participant
47	10/10/2017 11:03:36	Somewhat relevant	High quality of reviews, Well-known publisher, Topical focus (focus on recent and innovative topics in a relevant research area), Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, IBM, SAP, Having high quality co-located events, High number of citations to the accepted papers of the previous years	Review process, Topical focus, Acceptance rate	Review process, Topical focus, Acceptance rate	Location of the event	Very much	Networking possibility, Topical focus, Acceptance rate	To some extent	To some extent	3	between 10 and 30 lines	To some extent	Iswc, eswc, www,JCDL	For some cases	Search by keywords using browsers, Mailing list notifications, Well-know target events existing over a long period of time	author, participant
48	10/10/2017 11:04:51	Somewhat relevant	High quality of reviews, Organized by reputed people, High-profile keynote speakers, High number of citations to the accepted papers of the previous years	Topical focus, Acceptance rate, Long-standing events	Review process, Reputation of the organizers, Acceptance rate		To some extent	Networking possibility, Reputation of an event’s keynote speakers	To some extent	Very much	3	between 10 and 30 lines	To some extent	ISWC, ESWC, WWW, EKAW	Very much	Well-know target events existing over a long period of time	author without participation
49	10/10/2017 11:06:30	Highly relevant	High quality of reviews, Organized by reputed people, High-profile keynote speakers, Topical focus (focus on recent and innovative topics in a relevant research area), Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, IBM, SAP, Flexibility in accepting submissions in different formats/styles, Having high quality co-located events, High number of citations to the accepted papers of the previous years	Reputation of the organizers, Topical focus, Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, Yahoo, Long-standing events	Review process, Reputation of the organizers, Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, Yahoo		Very much	Networking possibility, Topical focus, Reputation of an event’s keynote speakers	Very much	Very much	3	less than 10 lines	To some extent	ACL, EMNLP, NAACL, CoNLL, EACL	Very much	Mailing list notifications	participant, participant without a paper
50	10/10/2017 11:22:37	Highly relevant	High quality of reviews, Well-known publisher, Organized by reputed people, High-profile keynote speakers, Topical focus (focus on recent and innovative topics in a relevant research area), High number of citations to the accepted papers of the previous years	Review process, Reputation of the organizers, Topical focus	Reputation of the organizers, Topical focus, Community building, e.g. room for discussions, community events...		To some extent	Networking possibility, Topical focus	Very much	Rather little	4	more than 50 lines	Rather little	ICSE, ASE, RE	For some cases	Search by keywords using browsers, Mailing list notifications, Well-know target events existing over a long period of time, Social media, Personal contact	organiser, reviewer, author, participant, participant without a paper
51	10/10/2017 11:27:21	Somewhat relevant	Well-known publisher, Organized by reputed people, High-profile keynote speakers	Publisher, Reputation of the organizers, Registration fee, Acceptance rate	Review process, Publisher, Reputation of the organizers, Co-located events		Very much	Topical focus, Acceptance rate	To some extent	To some extent	3	between 10 and 30 lines	To some extent		Very much	Search by keywords using browsers, Mailing list notifications	organiser, reviewer, author
52	10/10/2017 11:33:31	Highly relevant	High quality of reviews, Well-known publisher, Organized by reputed people, Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, IBM, SAP	Review process, Topical focus, Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, Yahoo	Review process, Topical focus, Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, Yahoo		Very much	Networking possibility, Topical focus	Not at all	Very much	2		Very much		For some cases
53	10/10/2017 11:41:42	Somewhat relevant	High quality of reviews, Well-known publisher, Topical focus (focus on recent and innovative topics in a relevant research area), High number of citations to the accepted papers of the previous years	Review process, Publisher, Reputation of the organizers	Review process, Publisher, Acceptance rate		Very much	Networking possibility, Topical focus	Very much	To some extent	3	between 10 and 30 lines	Very much	ACL, COLING, SIGIR, ICMLA, RecSys	For some cases	Search by keywords using browsers, Well-know target events existing over a long period of time	author, author without participation	No
54	03/01/2017 12:11:23	Highly relevant	High quality of reviews, Topical focus (focus on recent and innovative topics in a relevant research area)	Review process, Topical focus	Reputation of the organizers, Topical focus, Acceptance rate	Previous Events und their proceedings	To some extent	Networking possibility, Topical focus	To some extent	To some extent	3	between 10 and 30 lines	Rather little	ISWC, WWW, ESWC	Very much	Mailing list notifications, Well-know target events existing over a long period of time, Social media	author, participant
55	03/01/2017 12:24:54	Highly relevant	High quality of reviews, Well-known publisher, Organized by reputed people, High-profile keynote speakers, Low acceptance rate, Topical focus (focus on recent and innovative topics in a relevant research area), Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, IBM, SAP, Flexibility in accepting submissions in different formats/styles, Having high quality co-located events, High number of citations to the accepted papers of the previous years	Review process, Topical focus, Acceptance rate	Review process, Reputation of the organizers, Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, Yahoo		Very much	Networking possibility, Topical focus, Acceptance rate	Very much	To some extent	4	between 10 and 30 lines	Very much	ISWC, ESWC, WWW, CIKM, EKAW, AAAI	Very much	Search by keywords using browsers, Well-know target events existing over a long period of time, Social media	reviewer, author
56	03/01/2017 12:25:01	A bit relevant	Well-known publisher, High-profile keynote speakers, Low acceptance rate, Flexibility in accepting submissions in different formats/styles, Having high quality co-located events	Publisher, Co-located events, Acceptance rate	Publisher		To some extent					between 10 and 30 lines	To some extent		For some cases	Search by keywords using browsers, Mailing list notifications, Social media	organiser, reviewer, author, participant
57	03/01/2017 15:28:02	A bit relevant	High number of citations to the accepted papers of the previous years	Long-standing events	Review process		Very much	Networking possibility, Co-located events	Very much	Rather little	3	more than 50 lines	To some extent	ISWC, WWW, ESWC	For some cases	Mailing list notifications, Well-know target events existing over a long period of time, Personal contact	author, participant
58	18/05/2017 13:36:07	Highly relevant	High quality of reviews, Organized by reputed people, Low acceptance rate, Topical focus (focus on recent and innovative topics in a relevant research area), Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, IBM, SAP, Having high quality co-located events	Review process, Publisher, Acceptance rate	Publisher, Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, Yahoo, Acceptance rate	must seen places to travel	Very much	Networking possibility, Co-located events, Acceptance rate	Very much	Very much	3	between 10 and 30 lines	Very much	WWW, ISWC, ESWC	Very much	Search by keywords using browsers, Mailing list notifications, Social media	organiser, reviewer, author, participant, keynote speaker
59	18/05/2017 13:38:55	Somewhat relevant	High quality of reviews, Well-known publisher, Low acceptance rate	Review process, Publisher, Acceptance rate	Review process, Publisher, Co-located events		Very much	Networking possibility, Acceptance rate, Reputation of an event’s keynote speakers	Very much	Very much	4	between 10 and 30 lines	Very much		For some cases	Mailing list notifications	organiser, reviewer, author, participant, author without participation, participant without a paper, keynote speaker
60	18/05/2017 13:40:48	Highly relevant	High quality of reviews, Well-known publisher, Low acceptance rate	Publisher, Acceptance rate, Long-standing events	Publisher, Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, Yahoo, Acceptance rate		Very much	Networking possibility, Topical focus, Acceptance rate, Reputation of an event’s keynote speakers	Very much	To some extent	4	more than 50 lines	Very much	VLDB, SIGMOD, PODS	For some cases	Mailing list notifications, Well-know target events existing over a long period of time, Personal contact	organiser, reviewer, author, participant, keynote speaker
61	18/05/2017 13:41:56	Highly relevant	Well-known publisher, Low acceptance rate, Topical focus (focus on recent and innovative topics in a relevant research area)	Review process, Publisher, Topical focus, Submissions formats/styles, Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, Yahoo, Co-located events, Acceptance rate, Long-standing events	Publisher, Registration fee, Acceptance rate		Very much	Networking possibility, Topical focus, Co-located events, Acceptance rate, Reputation of an event’s keynote speakers	Very much	Very much	4	between 10 and 30 lines	To some extent		For some cases	Search by keywords using browsers, Mailing list notifications, Well-know target events existing over a long period of time	reviewer, author
62	31/08/2018 23:29:33	A bit relevant	Organized by reputed people, High-profile keynote speakers, Topical focus (focus on recent and innovative topics in a relevant research area), Sponsored by well-known companies e.g., Google, IBM, SAP	Reputation of the organizers, Registration fee, Acceptance rate	Reputation of the organizers, Topical focus, Registration fee		To some extent	Networking possibility	To some extent	Very much	3	between 10 and 30 lines	Very much	Dexa Semantics ESWC ISWC	For some cases	Well-know target events existing over a long period of time	organiser, reviewer, author


1	Timestamp	How is your background knowledge wrt. wikis in general?	How is your background knowledge wrt. Semantic MediaWiki?	How easy was it to get used with OpenResearch.org in the beginning?	How you would grade the ease of data importing in general?	How much time it takes to add a single event from a cfp (call for paper)?	How much time it takes to have a bulk import for a set of events?	Do you consider the time required for importing data reasonable?	How long it takes to save a form?	How fast pages based on queries are generated?	How often do you intend to add an event?	What roles have you had in scientific events?	Any comment?	How long does it take to announce your event by circulating CfPs through mailing lists and social media or any other way you do?

2	11/07/2017 11:56:38	To some extent	To some extent	To some extent	4	5-10 minutes	5-10 minutes	To some extent	Very little (fast)	Very fast	Once a week	PC member	The last Question is better to be multi Select
3	11/07/2017 12:07:10	To some extent	To some extent	Very much	5 (Very much)	less than 5 minutes	5-10 minutes	Very much	Very little (fast)	Very fast	Once a week	participant with paper, PC member
4	11/07/2017 12:07:53	Very much	Rather little	To some extent	2	5-10 minutes	5-10 minutes	To some extent	Medium	Very fast	Whenever there is a related event	participant with paper
5	11/07/2017 12:14:38	To some extent	Rather little	To some extent	4	5-10 minutes	5-10 minutes	To some extent	Medium	Medium	Once a week	participant without paper, participant with paper, PC member, Organizer		formulating the email and sending it plus keeping the social media posts will be all togetehr some hours
6	11/07/2017 12:15:33	Very much	Rather little	Rather little	3	5-10 minutes	more than 10 minutes	Rather little	Medium	Medium	Whenever there is a related event	participant without paper, participant with paper
7	11/07/2017 15:28:46	To some extent	Rather little	Rather little	2	more than 10 minutes	more than 10 minutes	Very much	Medium	Medium	Whenever there is a related event	participant without paper, participant with paper, PC member
8	11/07/2017 18:17:49	To some extent	To some extent	To some extent	4	less than 5 minutes			Rather little	Very fast	Whenever there is a related event	participant without paper, participant with paper, PC member
9	11/07/2017 23:54:42	To some extent	To some extent	To some extent	3	5-10 minutes	more than 10 minutes	To some extent	Medium	Very fast	Whenever there is a related event	participant without paper, participant with paper, PC member, Organizer		some hours
10	12/07/2017 11:31:09	To some extent	Rather little	To some extent	3	5-10 minutes	more than 10 minutes	To some extent	Rather little	Very fast	Whenever there is a related event	participant with paper
11	12/07/2017 12:09:25	To some extent	To some extent	To some extent	4	less than 5 minutes	5-10 minutes	To some extent	Very little (fast)	Very fast	Once a week	participant with paper, PC member, Organizer		few hours
12	12/07/2017 16:12:33	Very much	To some extent	To some extent	3	5-10 minutes	haven't done it		Medium	Medium	not used recently	participant without paper, participant with paper, PC member, Organizer, keynote speaker		some days
13	12/07/2017 17:37:04	To some extent	Very much	Very much	4	5-10 minutes	less than 5 minutes	To some extent	Very little (fast)	Very fast	Once a week	participant without paper	some optimizations still could be done, like UI, easiness, and more interesting
14	11/10/2017 12:12:05	Very much	To some extent	To some extent	5 (Very much)	less than 5 minutes	more than 10 minutes	To some extent	Very little (fast)	Very fast	Once a week	participant with paper
15	11/10/2017 12:26:14	Rather little	Rather little	To some extent	3	5-10 minutes	more than 10 minutes	To some extent	Rather little	Very fast	Whenever there is a related event	participant with paper, Organizer		1-2 hours
16	11/10/2017 13:52:52	Rather little	Rather little	To some extent	4	5-10 minutes	more than 10 minutes	To some extent	Rather little	Very fast	Whenever there is a related event	participant with paper
17	11/10/2017 23:28:17	To some extent	To some extent	Rather little	2	more than 10 minutes	more than 10 minutes	To some extent	Medium	Medium	Whenever there is a related event	participant with paper, PC member
18	09/11/2017 11:48:26	Rather little	Rather little	To some extent	4	5-10 minutes	5-10 minutes	To some extent	Very little (fast)	Very fast	Once a week	participant with paper, PC member, Organizer		1-2 days
19	09/11/2017 13:48:59	To some extent	Very much	Very much	4	5-10 minutes	5-10 minutes	To some extent	Medium	Very fast	Every two weeks	participant with paper, PC member, Organizer		some hours
20	09/11/2017 14:20:39	Very much	Rather little	Very much	4	5-10 minutes	5-10 minutes	To some extent	Rather little	Very fast	Whenever there is a related event	PC member, Organizer, keynote speaker		some hours
21	09/11/2017 14:49:39	Rather little	To some extent	To some extent	4	5-10 minutes	5-10 minutes	To some extent	Rather little		Whenever there is a related event	participant with paper, PC member


1	Property	Role	Avg. Score
2	Submission appearance	Organizer	9.266666667
3	Localation Related	Organizer	9.9
4	Acceptence process	Organizer	9.183333333
5	Publishing Process	Organizer	9.6
6	Event Popularity	Organizer	9.915254237
7	Event Occurrence	Organizer	9.8
8	Submission Appearance	Author	8.533333333
9	Location Related	Author	7.233333333
10	Acceptence Process	Author	3.95
11	Publishing Process	Author	8.216666667
12	Event Popularity	Author	9.762711864
13	Event Occurrence	Author	8.916666667
14	Submission Appearance	Reviewer	2.983333333
15	Location Related	Reviewer	0.5333333333
16	Acceptence Process	Reviewer	9.933333333
17	Publishing Process	Reviewer	3.366666667
18	Event Popularity	Reviewer	8.847457627
19	Event Occurrence	Reviewer	0.45
20	Submission Appearance	Presenter	4.55
21	Location Related	Presenter	8.083333333
22	Acceptence Process	Presenter	0.4333333333
23	Publishing Process	Presenter	8.186440678
24	Event Popularity	Presenter	8.305084746
25	Event Occurrence	Presenter	9.35
26	Submission Appearance	Speaker	1.866666667
27	Location Related	Speaker	8.633333333
28	Acceptence Process	Speaker	0.8166666667
29	Publishing Process	Speaker	3.6
30	Event Popularity	Speaker	2.948275862
31	Event Occurrence	Speaker	8.65
32	Submission Appearance	Participant	2.116666667
33	Location Related	Participant	8.383333333
34	Acceptence Process	Participant	0.5666666667
35	Publishing Process	Participant	0
36	Event Popularity	Participant	8.779661017
37	Event Occurrence	Participant	9
38	Submission Appearance	Publisher	9.366666667
39	Location Related	Publisher	0.6666666667
40	Acceptence Process	Publisher	9.583333333
41	Publishing Process	Publisher	0
42	Event Popularity	Publisher	7.440677966
43	Event Occurrence	Publisher	0
44	Submission Appearance	Sponsor	1.2
45	Location Related	Sponsor	5.033333333
46	Acceptence Process	Sponsor	0.06666666667
47	Publishing Process	Sponsor	9.9
48	Event Popularity	Sponsor	4.13559322
49	Event occurence	Sponsor	8.7
50	Submission Appearance	Atten.Sponsor	2.916666667
51	Location Related	Atten.Sponsor	8.7
52	Acceptence Process	Atten.Sponsor	0
53	Publishing Process	Atten.Sponsor	1.516666667
54	Event Popularity	Atten.Sponsor	0.4333333333
55	Event Occurrence	Atten.Sponsor	8.366666667
56	Submission Appearance	Reader	4.966666667
57	Location Related	Reader	0
58	Acceptence Process	Reader	0.15
59	Publishing Process	Reader	6.366666667
60	Event Popularity	Reader	0.1694915254
61	Event Occurrence	Reader	0.2


1	ServiceName	CareOnQuality	ReuseableData
2	WikiCFP	0	4
3	PaperLeap	2	0
4	CORE	6	1
5	SpringerLOD	3	6
6	CEUR-WS	6	3
7	CFP Manager	2	0
8	GSM	0	2
9	Cfplist	1	1
10	ScholarlyData	3	3
11	Conference.city	1	0
12	PapersInvited	3	0
13	SemanticScholar	2	6
14	DBWorld	2	2


1	Dimension	Dependency
2	Submissions	Review Process
3	Submissions	Review Results
4	Submissions	Location
5	Submissions	Topical Focus
6	Submissions	Reputation and Impact
7	Submissions	Publicity
8	Submissions	Person Roles
9	Publishing	Journal Event Coupling
10	Publishing	Availability and Access
11	Publishing	Bibliometrics
12	Publishing	Review Results
13	Publishing	Topicsl Focus
14	Publishing	Registration
15	Bibliometrics	Discoverability
16	Bibliometrics	Reputation and Impact
17	Reputation and Impact	Social Network
18	Reputation and Impact	Publicity
19	Reputation and Impact	Topicsl Focus
20	Sponsorship	Awards
21	Sponsorship	Registration
22	Sponsorship	Location
23	Sponsorship	Schedule
24	Schedule	Submissions
25	Review Results	Person Roles
26	Review Process	Review Results
27	Schedule	Review Results
28	Person Roles	Person Backgrounds
29	Reputation and Impact	Person Backgrounds
30	Reputation and Impact	Person Roles
31
32
33
34
35
36
37