You are on page 1of 12

Volume 3, Issue 6, June – 2018 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology

ISSN No:-2456-2165

Finite Element Analysis of High Pressure Composite


Vessels
Deepak Kumar Arun1, Ankita Awasthi2
M. Tech.(CAD-CAM) , Assistant Professor , Mechanical Engineering Department1,2, IILM Academy of Higher learning College of
1 2

Engineering & Technology1,2, Greater Noida, India

Abstract:- Pressure vessel is a shut compartment intended to properties are separating in their slant with the objective that
hold gases or fluids at a weight generously not the same as ensured metal can't show in the meantime every one of these
the surrounding weight. Data, for example, plan and properties, So the blueprint engineers ought to overseeing
segment improvement time was examined and displayed to intentionally at the decision of the materials that used for the
guarantee the impact of usage of this way to deal with item arrangement .In our undertaking we have taken three materials
advancement cycle and outline efficiencies This task talks (ferrous, non-ferrous and composite materials) and after that
about some plan rules that are manages vessels are subjected clearing up the qualification among them. Composite materials
to different connected powers acting in blend with interior have ended up being typical building materials and are outlined
weight with the assistance of utilizing Al Alloy 6061-T6 and and fabricated for different applications, for example, weight
S-Glass. Plan of weight vessels is represented by the ASME vessels.
weight vessel code. The code gives for thickness and worry of
fundamental segment; it is up to the fashioner to choose II. HISTORY
suitable diagnostic as method for deciding worry because of
different loadings. Structures, for example, pipes or The soonest reported outline of weight vessels is depicted
containers fit for holding inner weight has been vital ever of in the book Codex Madrid I, by Leonardo da Vinci, in 1495,
and innovation. Plan of various pressure vessel worried where holders of pressurized air were guessed to lift
about components, for example, shell, Dish end, and spouts overwhelming weights submerged, anyway vessels taking after
in view of benchmarks and codes; and development of shell, what are utilized today did not come to fruition until the point
dish end and spouts broke down by methods for ANSYS for when the 1800s where steam was produced in boilers impelling
two materials (AL ALLOY 6061-T6 and S-Glass) and after the modern upset. In any case, with poor material quality and
that compare to pick the best outline. assembling procedures alongside disgraceful information of
plan, task and support there was an extensive number of harming
Keywords:- Pressure Vessels Design ASMA, Finite Element and frequently deadly blasts related with these boilers and
Analysis ANSYS, Von–Mises Stress& Ansys 15.0. weight vessels, with a demise happening on an almost regular
routine in the United States. Neighborhood provisions and states
I. INTRODUCTION in the US started authorizing rules for building these vessels
after some especially destroying vessel disappointments
A Pressure vessel is a closed compartment expected to happened killing many individuals at once, which made it
hold gases or liquids at a weight liberally not exactly the same as troublesome for makers to stay aware of the differed rules
the encompassing weight. The weight differential is hazardous starting with one area then onto the next and the primary weight
and deadly setbacks have happened ever of vessel change and vessel code was produced beginning in 1911 and discharged in
undertaking. Along these lines, Pressure vessel setup, deliver, 1914, beginning the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code
and undertaking reregulated by planning specialists maintained (BPVC). In an early push to plan a tank fit for withstanding
by institution. In this way, the significance of a Pressure vessel weights up to 10,000 psi (69 MPa), a 6-inch (150 mm)
changes from country to country, yet incorporates parameter, for measurement tank was produced in 1919 that was spirally-
instance, most prominent safe working weight and temperature. twisted with two layers of high rigidity steel wire to avert
The Pressure vessels are used to store fluids under strain. The sidewall burst, and the end tops longitudinally fortified with
fluid being secured may encounter a distinction in state inside longwise high-malleable bars. The requirement for high weight
the Pressure vessels as though there ought to emerge an event of and temperature vessels for oil refineries and synthetic plants
steam boilers or it may join with various reagents as in offered ascend to vessels joined with welding rather than bolts
compound plants. (which were inadmissible for the weights and temperatures
required) and in 1930s the BPVC included welding as an
Weight vessels find wide applications in warm and nuclear adequate method for development, and welding is the primary
power plants, process and substance organizations, in space and methods for joining metal vessels today.
ocean profundities, and in water, steam, gas and air supply
structure in endeavors, from a building point of view, properties
related with metals are adaptability, flexibility, shortcoming,
adaptability and malleability. A substantial number of these

IJISRT18JU299 www.ijisrt.com 351


Volume 3, Issue 6, June – 2018 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
III. ABOUT ANSYS A. Operating Pressure: As well as the normal steady operating
pressure, the maximum maintained pressure needs to be
ANSYS is the art of forecasting pressure stream, defined. Regulations and/or standards will define how this
Deformation and Safety. maximum pressure is translated into vessel design pressure.

ANSYS is utilized as a part of all phases of the outline B. Fluid Conditions: Maximum and minimum fluid
procedure: temperatures will need to be specified and translated into
metal design temperatures. Fluid physical and chemical
Theoretical investigations of new plans – properties will influence material choice and specific
gravity will effect support design.
 Detailed product development
 Troubleshooting C. External Loads: Loads to be considered include wind,
 Redesign snow, and local loads such as piping reactions and dead
weight of equipment supported from the vessel.
ANSYS investigation supplements testing and
experimentation by lessening all out exertion and cost required D. Transient Conditions: Some vessels may require an
for experimentation. assessment of cyclic loads resulting from operational
pressure, temperature, structural and acoustic vibration
Following are a portion of the territories, where ANSYS is loading.
being utilized:-
VI. MATERIAL PROPERTIES
 HVAC
 Automobile The material will have selected which is based upon the
 Food Processing following properties.
 Marine  Elongation and reduction of area at fracture.
 Aerospace  Notch toughness.
 Electronics  Ageing and embrittlement under operating conditions.
 Fatigue strength.
IV. TYPES OF PRESSURE VESSEL FRAMEWORKS  Availability.

A. Spherical Pressure Vessel (Sphere) - This type of vessel is VII. MATERIAL RANGE
preferred for storage of high pressure fluids. A sphere is a very
strong structure. The even distribution of stresses on the sphere's The range of materials used for pressure vessels is wide
surfaces, both internally and externally, generally means that and includes, but is not limited to, the following.
there are no weak points. Spheres however, are much more
costly to manufacture than cylindrical vessels.Storage Spheres  Carbon steel (with less than 0.25% carbon).
need ancillary equipment similar to tank storage - e.g. Access  Carbon manganese steel (giving higher strength than carbon
manholes, Pressure / Vacuum vent that is set to prevent venting steel).
loss from boiling and breathing loss from daily temperature or  Low alloy steels.
barometric pressure changes, Access ladders, Earthing points,  High alloy steels.
etc.  Austenitic stainless steels.
B. Cylindrical Pressure Vessel (Cylinder)–Cylinders are widely  Non-ferrous materials (aluminum, copper, nickel and alloys).
used for storage due to their being less expensive to produce  High duty bolting materials.
than spheres. However, cylinders are not as strong as spheres
due to the weak point at each end.This weakness is reduced by VIII. TASK DEFINITIONS
hemispherical or rounded ends being fitted. If the whole cylinder
is manufactured from thicker material than a comparable This proposition will research how well short weight,
spherical vessel of similar capacity, storage pressure can be Pressure vessel with diff-2 composition can withstand applied
similar to that of a sphere. pressure. The reason for this work is to pick up learning about
the creation of S Glass fiber and AL-ALLOY 6061-T6 pressure
V. OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS vessel utilizing fiber winding, their conduct when presented to
outer weight and investigation techniques used to composition.
The first step in this design procedure is to set down the To play out the investigation, sensible input information must be
operational requirements. These are imposed on the vessel as found.
part of the overall plant and include the following.

IJISRT18JU299 www.ijisrt.com 352


Volume 3, Issue 6, June – 2018 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
In this research we investigated about stress variation at D. Alok Tom et. al. have analyzed both aluminum amalgams
diff-2 orientation of composition For AL-ALLOY 6061-T6 and are reasonable for supplanting steel barrels these chambers
S-Glass Fibre. would withstand more pressure contrasted with the steel
barrel. The existence time of these barrels will be twofold
IX. LITERATURE REVIEW contrasted with the steel chamber due to their less erosion
rate. [7]
A. Sabah Salim Hamza et. al. [1] has done examination The
exact approach compares to configuration by govern and E. Eswara Kumar et. al. have examine that the above
limited component examination relates to outline by perceptions, it can suggest that, Graphite epoxy with [0/45/ -
examination technique are embraced and estimations were 45/90]s having great clasping quality among the considered
made by (ASME weight vessel The pressure dissemination materials and layup groupings. In perspective of modular
of different geometric parameters of each part is seen to examination graphite demonstrates the higher normal
choose the ideal thickness of three materials. This recurrence for the grouping of [0/45/-45/90]s perspective of
demonstrates the plan by investigation is the most attractive static basic, for good firmness graphite material with
strategy to assess and foresee the conduct of various designs [0/90/90/0]s was suggested. In any case, in quality
of weight vessel. The correlation of' these outcomes perspective S-glass epoxy with [45/90/ - 45/0]s was
furnishes the most advanced outline with a capacity to meet prescribed. [12]
the prerequisites. Subsequent to breaking down the pressure
conduct of the weight vessel with various geometrical F. Hiren Dhameliya et. al. have observe that spot welding
parameters, I presumed that the plan of given Horizontal process is generally huge joining process in the car
weight vessel is protected by the both the outcomes. businesses due to rapid and appropriate for computerization.
Any new advancement of this welding procedure is nearly
B. S. Senthil Murugan et. al. have done about The mix impact by the requested of these businesses. The RSW of
throwing strategy is effectively connected for aluminum compound will request appropriate process
manufacturing Aluminum network composite strengthened parameters to expand its weld quality. Aluminum
with SiC and Al2O3 for IC motor pushrod application. The compound 6082 T651 can be an appropriate trade of
SiC and Al2O3 enhances the wear obstruction of AA5754 for various applications with great economy and
composites by framing a defensive layer between stick and quality. Warm examination demonstrates that aluminum
counter face. From this investigation, the properties for AA compound 6082-T651 can be utilized for substitute of
6061-7% of Al2O3-20 wt. % SiC strengthened cross breed AA5754 aluminum compound for decrease of cost of
particulate Aluminum composites are: the rigidity is 124 materials in car industry with the utilization of opposition
N/mm2, most extreme yield quality is 97 N/mm2 and spot welding process. There are different perceptions from
greatest break pressure esteem watched is 110.2 N/mm2, this work are under effective weld spot was acquired after
compressive quality was noted as 300N/mm2, affect quality experimentation technique for 1mm thickness , According
is 100N/mm. The present examination researched the static to the trial examination chunk measurement (significant
basic investigation of the IC Engine pushrods and its pivot and minor pivot of circle) was watched which is
gathering of organization of AA 6061-20 % of SiC-7 % of likewise in closeness with piece measurements found in
Al2O3 cross breed composite. ANSYS workbench programming investigation and For 1mm plate thickness
programming bundle was used to anticipate the pressure and AA 6082 T651 fulfills the near criteria of AA5754 and
disfigurement appropriation on the pushrod and the qualities subsequently it can be supplant Materia AA5754l in car
were noted. IC motor pushrods were effectively ventures. [20]
manufactured for the organization of Al6061-20%SiC and
7%Al2O3 cross breed metal grid composite. [2] G. P. Ravikanth Raju et al. have done this work RPV (reactor
weight vessel) which demonstrate is made utilizing creep
C. Abdul Arif et. al. has done The consequences of warm and apparatus creo-2 and afterward it is broke down with CAE
basic examination which are reproduced utilizing ANSYS® device ANSYS workbench. To begin with reactor weight
are utilized to assess the temperature dispersion and leftover vessel made with basic steel of 60 mm and 80 mm thickness
worries in the work-piece geometry. By utilizing ANSYS, is displayed and broke down with the limit conditions. With
three dimensional expository models are created which are increment in thickness the weight vessel puts on more
ended up being dependable and compelling for welding weight and diminishes pressure yet it likewise builds cost
reproduction of FSW. The longitudinal lingering stresses because of expanding the weight. So as to decrease the cost
are around 30-45% transverse of the remaining anxieties. of weight vessel it is made with various materials, for
Estimations of temperatures furthermore, lingering stresses example, aluminum compound – 6061-t6, treated steel - 316
got by limited component technique are near the genuine and tempered steel - 304 and after that these are investigated
temperature appropriation and lingering worries in the in ANSYS workbench with a similar limit conditions. From
welded development. [5] the outcomes weight vessel made of treated steel 316
creates less pressure esteems yet when taken a toll

IJISRT18JU299 www.ijisrt.com 353


Volume 3, Issue 6, June – 2018 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
estimation likewise is considered al-6061-t6 is better when picks up significance for such a break proliferation in AL-
contrast with ss-316 cost. [21] 6061. This examination builds up the way that, break start
and engendering begin from locales of high feelings of
H. Medhavi Sinha et. al. have done her investigation, the anxiety and reliance of SIF extends on break development
limited component model of CFRP, tube shaped composite amid exhaustion stacking. The split spread example in
weight vessel is built up utilizing limited component aluminum amalgams, are because of the adjustments in the
programming ANSYS 11. The models got for different fiber split surface from level to incline at higher break
introductions are coincided utilizing a straight layered development rates that prompts the arrangement of shear
structure shell component, SHELL 99. The investigation lips. This investigation has additionally settled a Finite
talks about a well ordered strategy for the examination of component technique strategy for numerical arrangement of
round and hollow composite weight vessel which is a FCG trial of an AT example. This investigation will help
subjected to high inward weight stacking. The burst weights in outline of weight vessels and barrels in view of the idea
for different fiber introductions are anticipated utilizing the of pre-presence of imperfections. [27]
Tsai-Wu disappointment criteria. The ± 45° fiber
introduction point is acquired as the ideal fiber introduction L. Prof. Pinank A. Patel et. al. have got the result from the
plot for the composite weight vessel subjected to high examination of lower suspension arm it is reasoned that if
inward weight stacking. It can be finished up from the Al amalgam (Al 7075- T6) will give relative higher
examination that the limit of the CFRP weight vessel to exhaustion life then C45. Thus, weight of the part made up
shoulder high interior weight is most prominent among the from Al Alloy (Al 7075-T6) is in this way diminished
different fiber introductions edges under investigation. [23] (Approx 60%). [29]

I. Mohamed Abdusalam Hussin et. al. have concluded that the M. Eswara Kumar. A et. al. have done his research from the
future extension Solid demonstrating of interfacing bar were perceptions of case-1 and case-2, in firmness perspective
made by generation drawing particular and examination composite made up of 4- layers E-glass and 4-layers s-glass
under the impact of elastic and compressive loads in terms was prescribed. In perspective of stress, composite with
of weight is done in ANSYS Workbench. In the present 2layers E-glass+ 2layers graphite + 2layers Kevlar+ 2 layers
plan and investigation of interfacing pole utilizing s-glass was suggested. In perspective of common
aluminum amalgam 7068 T6, T6511 have been finished frequencies, composite with 4 layers s-glass + 4layers
with the assistance of SOLID WORK and ANSYS 15.0. graphite was suggested. In perspective of clasping 4 layers
Here Analysis is improved the situation the Normal worry graphite + 4 layers s glass was suggested. From these
and Shear worry in x-y plane. From demonstrating and suggestions, every mix will act in various ways for various
recreation, Solid work is great however for the Analysis, it examinations. It isn't feasible for a half breed composite if
is watched that ANSYS is better than other programming. all layers are in 0 deg introduction, to go about as best
Here we can discover least worries among all stacking material for various loads conditions. [30]
conditions, were at wrench end top and in addition at
cylinder end. So the material can be diminished from those X. PRESSURE VESSEL MATERIAL
segments, in this manner lessening material cost. [24]
There are a wide assortment of materials accessible, each
J. Hamza A. Ghulman has examined that the direct and with its own properties, favorable circumstances, impediments
nonlinear limited component models are competent to and applications. They can be extensively delegated takes after.
mimic the bendable crack mechanics. Utilizing J-basic
approach display in light of crease break and after that
executed into ABAQUS bundle is an effective instrument to
accomplish the recreation of flexible break. The got comes
about demonstrated that the crack durability of thin
aluminum amalgam 6061-T6 is anticipated well with the
proposed limited component demonstrate. It is affirmed that
for design strain state, surface discharge vitality is
autonomous on the example thickness. As such, the impact
of aluminum sheet thickness on the surface discharge
vitality is little. [25]

K. Mahantesh Matur et. al. have experimented that the


Exploratory and Numerical recreation of weariness break
development in an AT example of AL-6061 as created with
an underlying score has been introduced. As very little work
in the writing on investigations of break spread in bended
surfaces as experienced in weight vessels, this investigation

IJISRT18JU299 www.ijisrt.com 354


Volume 3, Issue 6, June – 2018 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
A. Metallic Material Fiber Buckling is described by a diminishment of
Metals have been the commanding materials in the past for compressive solidness and quality of the cover. The beginning
auxiliary applications. They give the biggest outline and and extent of the fiber clasping and the compressive property
preparing history to the specialists. The normal metals are press, misfortune is managed by the properties of the filaments and
aluminum, copper, magnesium, zinc, lead, nickel, and titanium. grid.
In auxiliary applications, amalgams are more every now and
again utilized than unadulterated metals. Compounds are framed B. Fiber Breakage
by blending diverse materials, once in a while including non- Fiber Breakage happens when filaments break, making
metallic components. them unfit to convey ductile burdens. At the point when strands
are encompassed by a lattice, the framework fills in as an
Metallic materials can be additionally subdivided into two extension over the broken fiber transmitting the heap. This is
gatherings. called fiber crossing over.
 Ferrous Metals
 Non-Ferrous Metals. C. Matrix Cracking
Matrix cracking in itself isn't regularly a purpose behind
B. Polymeric Materials extreme overlay disappointment. Be that as it may, network
Polymeric materials are routinely alluded to as 'plastics'. splits may cause other unsafe impacts. Among those impacts are
Polymers are framed by consolidating together countless regularly dampness assimilation, solidness diminishment
concoction units (monomer atoms) to shape long chain particles overwhelmed by the grid, and it might incite delamination.
(polymers). Carbon is the principle building piece of polymer
materials however at least one different component, for example, D. Delamination
hydrogen, nitrogen, chlorine and oxygen are a piece of this Delamination is a disappointment mode where the layers
building square. of the material separate from each other. Transverse effect stacks
on the cover is a typical reason for delamination.
C. Ceramics
Earthenware productions have solid covalent bonds and in XII. METHODOLOGY
this way give awesome warm solidness what's more, high
hardness. They are the most unbending of all materials. The Fundamentally structure examination includes three
major recognizing normal for pottery when contrasted with noteworthy assignments called Pre-Processing, Processing
metals is that they have no flexibility. They bomb in fragile (Solving) and Post Processing.
form. Earthenware productions have the most elevated
liquefying purposes of building materials. They are for the most A. Pre-Processing: All the errands that happen before the
part utilized for high-temperature and high-wear applications numerical arrangement are called pre-handling. This
and are impervious to most types of synthetic assault. incorporates characterizing the issue, making its 3D model,
fitting, and applying physical working condition called limit
D. Composites conditions.
Composite materials have been used to take care of
mechanical issues for a long time yet just in the 1960s did these B. Processing: Processing includes fathoming numerical
materials begin catching the consideration of ventures with the conditions of strong structure until the point when
presentation of polymeric-based composites. From that point inacceptable union is accomplished. Generally it requires
forward, composite materials have turned out to be regular the PC to explain a large number of conditions and may take
building materials and are planned furthermore, fabricated for couple of hours to few days.
different applications including car parts, brandishing products,
aviation parts, purchaser merchandise, and in the marine and oil C. Post-Processing: When the model has been settled, the
enterprises. The development in composite utilization outcomes can be broke down both numerically and
additionally came to fruition as a result of expanded mindfulness graphically. Post-handling is about perception either in
with respect to item execution and expanded rivalry in the straightforward 2-D to 3-D portrayals.
worldwide advertises for lightweight segments.

E. Others XIII. SELECTED MATERIAL FOR RESEARCH


In others comes an e.g. glass, wood, semiconductor etc.
We selected two materials for this projects that is Liner
XI. IDEA OF FAILURE (AL-ALLOY 6061-T6) and S-Glass.

Typical failure modes for fiber-reinforced composites are:  AL-ALLOY 6061-T6


 S-Glass
A. Fiber Buckling-

IJISRT18JU299 www.ijisrt.com 355


Volume 3, Issue 6, June – 2018 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
 AL-ALLOY 6061-T6 XIV. WEIGHT CALCULATION OF COMPOSITES

FOR COMPOSITE I

Composite I
Mass (gm) 25555.78
Volume (cubic mm) 35908856.42
Surface Area (Square mm) 30314760.61
Centre of Mass in " X"
0
Direction (mm)
"Y" Direction (mm) 684
"Z" Direction (mm) 0

FOR COMPOSITE II

Composite II
Mass (gm) 26771.21
Volume (cubic mm) 37542608.17
Surface Area (Square mm) 30523211.57
Centre of Mass in " X" Direction
0
(mm)
"Y" Direction (mm) 684
"Z" Direction (mm) 0

FOR COMPOSITE III

Composite III
Mass (gm) 27995.03
Volume (cubic mm) 39187581.69
Surface Area (Square mm) 30732140.05
Centre of Mass in " X" Direction
0
(mm)
"Y" Direction (mm) 684
"Z" Direction (mm) 0

FOR COMPOSITE IV
Mechanical Properties of AL-ALLOY 6061-T6
Composite IV
Mass (gm) 27850.89
 S-Glass Volume (cubic mm) 39187581.69
Surface Area (Square mm) 33593502.63
Centre of Mass in " X" Direction
0
(mm)
"Y" Direction (mm) 684
"Z" Direction (mm) 0

Mechanical Properties of S-Glass

IJISRT18JU299 www.ijisrt.com 356


Volume 3, Issue 6, June – 2018 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
FOR COMPOSITE V FOR COMPOSITE X

Composite V Composite X
Mass (gm) 29082.04 Mass (gm) 32535.72
Volume (cubic mm) 40843802.11 Volume (cubic mm) 45880196.1
Surface Area (Square mm) 33824422.26 Surface Area (Square mm) 40286150.56
Centre of Mass in " X" Direction Centre of Mass in " X" Direction
0 0
(mm) (mm)
"Y" Direction (mm) 684 "Y" Direction (mm) 684
"Z" Direction (mm) 0 "Z" Direction (mm) 0

FOR COMPOSITE VI FOR COMPOSITE XI

Composite VI Composite XI
Mass (gm) 30321.63 Mass (gm) 33798.54
Volume (cubic mm) 42511294.56 Volume (cubic mm) 47581655.46
Surface Area (Square mm) 34055869.67 Surface Area (Square mm) 40562309.12
Centre of Mass in " X" Direction Centre of Mass in " X" Direction
0 0
(mm) (mm)
"Y" Direction (mm) 684 "Y" Direction (mm) 684
"Z" Direction (mm) 0 "Z" Direction (mm) 0

FOR COMPOSITE VII FOR COMPOSITE XII

CompositeVII Composite XII


Mass (gm) 30177.49 Mass (gm) 35096.87
Volume (cubic mm) 42511294.56 Volume (cubic mm) 49294487.38
Surface Area (Square mm) 36917232.26 Surface Area (Square mm) 40839096
Centre of Mass in " X" Direction Centre of Mass in " X" Direction
0 0
(mm)
(mm)
"Y" Direction (mm) 684
"Y" Direction (mm) 684
"Z" Direction (mm) 0
"Z" Direction (mm) 0
FOR COMPOSITE VIII
FOR COMPOSITE XIII
Composite XIII
Composite VIII
Mass (gm) 34925.72
Mass (gm) 31424.44
Volume (cubic mm) 49294487.38
Volume (cubic mm) 44190084.18
Surface Area (Square mm) 37170721.09 Surface Area (Square mm) 43700458.59
Centre of Mass in " X" Direction Centre of Mass in " X" Direction
0 0
(mm) (mm)
"Y" Direction (mm) 684 "Y" Direction (mm) 684
"Z" Direction (mm) 0 "Z" Direction (mm) 0

FOR COMPOSITE IX FOR COMPOSITE XIV

Composite IX Composite XIV


Mass (gm) 32679.86 Mass (gm) 36204.48
Volume (cubic mm) 45880196.1 Volume (cubic mm) 51018717
Surface Area (Square mm) 37424787.97 Surface Area (Square mm) 43999387.41
Centre of Mass in " X" Direction Centre of Mass in " X" Direction
0 0
(mm) (mm)
"Y" Direction (mm) 684 "Y" Direction (mm) 684
"Z" Direction (mm) 0 "Z" Direction (mm) 0

IJISRT18JU299 www.ijisrt.com 357


Volume 3, Issue 6, June – 2018 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
FOR COMPOSITE XV

Composite XV
Mass (gm) 37491.78
Volume (cubic mm) 52754369.44
Surface Area (Square mm) 44298994.82
Centre of Mass in " X" Direction
0
(mm)
"Y" Direction (mm) 684
"Z" Direction (mm) 0

FOR COMPOSITE XVI

Composite XVI
Mass (gm) 37347.64
Volume (cubic mm) 52754369.44
Surface Area (Square mm) 47160357.41
B. Characterize Materials
Centre of Mass in " X" Direction Characterize a library of materials for Analysis. In this
0
(mm) Analysis of pressure vessel, chose materials are AL-ALLOY
"Y" Direction (mm) 684 6061-T6 and S-Glass. These materials can be provided
"Z" Direction (mm) 0 manually.

FOR COMPOSITE XVII C. Generate Mesh


Presently produce the work. This partitions the illustration
Composite XVII into limited number of pieces. It will demonstrate the quantity of
Mass (gm) 38642.41 hubs and components display in the illustration in the wake of
Volume (cubic mm) 54501469.86 cross section is finished.
Surface Area (Square mm) 47482157.03
Centre of Mass in " X" Direction
0
(mm)
"Y" Direction (mm) 684
"Z" Direction (mm) 0

FOR COMPOSITE XVIII

Composite XVIII
Mass (gm) 39945.75
Volume (cubic mm) 56260043.36
Surface Area (Square mm) 47804685.5
Centre of Mass in " X" Direction
0
(mm)
"Y" Direction (mm) 684
"Z" Direction (mm) 0

XV. ANALYSIS PROCEDURE OF PRESSURE VESSEL D. Apply Boundary conditions


Basically boundary limit conditions are considered for the
A. Geometry pressure vessel. For this situation both the closures of the
To start with produce the geometric model of the pressure pressure vessel are given.
vessel from SOLIDWORKS into ANSYS programming.
E. Layering
A pressure vessel is made of the different types of layering
of the composites. In order to achieve the efficient result we uses
different types of layering.

IJISRT18JU299 www.ijisrt.com 358


Volume 3, Issue 6, June – 2018 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165

F. Get Solution and Obtain Result- 650 Orientation

Result outcomes in the form of deformation and strass.


Von-Mises Stress:Von-Mises Stresses at different orientations:

750 Orientation

250 Orientation

850 Orientation

350 Orientation XVI. RESULTS

 Stresses for Minimum Stress Plot

Von Mises Stress(Mpa)


9 10 11 12 13 14
Layers in mm
Orientation(Degree) 25 25 25 25 25 25
285.38 307.54 335.76

275.16 295.64 320.01

265.96 285.08 313.34

253.23 267.04 286.81

250.23 259.03 277.56


Von Mises Stress(Mpa)
275.34 289.7

Liner-6mm
450 Orientation Von Mises Stress(Mpa)
Liner-7 mm

Von Mises Stress(Mpa)


257.5

Liner-8mm

550 Orientation

IJISRT18JU299 www.ijisrt.com 359


Volume 3, Issue 6, June – 2018 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
This abatement the general weight of the segment as well
as the cost of the material required to make the weight vessel.
This is one of the principle parts of fashioner to keep the weight
and cost as low as would be prudent.

The burdens created in the multilayered vessels are


progressively when contrasted and strong vessels. Minimization
of stress focus is another most vital part of the planner. It
likewise demonstrates that the material is used most viably in the
manufacture of shell.

Inferable from the upsides of the multi layered weight


vessels over the ordinary single dividers weight vessels, it is
Stresses for Minimum Stress Plot inferred that multi layered weight vessels are predominant for
high weights and high temperature working conditions.

 Deformation for Minimum Stress Plot By utilizing composite material S Glass instead of steel,
diminishes the general weight of multilayered vessels nearly by
Deformation Layer in 50000kg and furthermore by investigation it is demonstrated that
9 10 11 12 13 14 utilizing S glass is likewise sheltered since the broke down
mm
pressure esteem is not as much as yield pressure esteem.
Orientation(Degree) 25 25 25 25 25 25
So it is obvious from examination that by utilizing
2.0137 2.2824 2.6263

1.9854 2.2449 2.5753

1.9545 2.2037 2.5192

2.1641 2.4737

2.4141

1.8925 2.0856 2.3641

variation XVIII at a fiber introduction point of 25̊ is appropriate


Deformation Liner-6mm
to plan a pressure vessel of 90L limit on the grounds that there is
a lessening of 45.06Kg from conventional pressure vessel and in
addition low pressure.
1.8987 2.124

Deformation Liner-7 mm
REFERENCES
1.924

Deformation Liner-8mm [1]. Sabah Salim Hamza & Gopi Krishna , International Journal
of Mechanical and Production Engineering Research and
Development (IJMPERD), Vol. 5, Issue 4, Aug 2015, 61-
74.
[2]. S. Senthil Murugan & V. Jagan, International Journal of
Modern Studies in Mechanical Engineering (IJMSME)
Volume 3, Issue 1, 2017, PP 23-34.
[3]. S. Mohan Kumar& J. Surender, International Journal of
Engineering Science and Computing, Volume 6 Issue No. 8
August 2016.
[4]. Javad Marzbanrad, Amin Paykani, Amir Afkar, Mostafa
Ghajar & J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 4 (1) (2013) 63-74,
Received 7 May 2012, Revised 8 Sept 2012, Accepted 8
Sept 2012.
[5]. Abdul Arif, Abhishek & K. N. Pandey , International
Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (IJEST),
Vol. 5 ,No. 06 June 2013.
Deformation for Minimum Stress Plot [6]. R. K. H. NG, A. Yousefpour, M. Uyema & M. N. Ghasemi
Nejhad, Journal of Composite Materials, Vol. 36, No.
XVII. CONCLUSION 21/2002.
[7]. Alok Tom, Geo Mathew Pius, George Joseph, Jacob Jose &
At present, strong divider weight vessels are utilized Mathew J Joseph, International Journal of Engineering &
widely. Be that as it may, by utilizing multilayered vessels, there Applied Sciences (IJEAS) .Vol.6, Issue 2(2014) 17-31.
is a tremendous contrast in weight. The weight is relatively [8]. Anup Kumar Shetty, Abijeet TK, James William Machado
diminished by 19.26 Kg when multilayered vessels are utilized & Shrivathsa TV , International Journal of Innovative
as a part of place of strong vessels. Research in Advanced Engineering (IJIRAE) , Issue 04,
Volume 4 (April 2017).

IJISRT18JU299 www.ijisrt.com 360


Volume 3, Issue 6, June – 2018 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
[9]. Chapter 5 design and optimisation of the absorber - JMCE), Volume 12, Issue 5 Ver. II (Sep. - Oct. 2015), PP
Shodhganga. 68-74.
[10]. M.S. Najiha, M. M. Rahman & K. Kadirgama, [28]. M.I. Ramli, M.Z. Nuawi, M.R.M. Rasani, S. Abdullah
International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical & K. K. Seng, International Journal of Applied Engineering
Engineering (IJAME), Volume 11, pp. 2699-2712, January- Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 12, Number 5 (2017)
June 2015. pp. 787-792.
[11]. Mr. Mukund Kavekar, Mr. Vinayak H.Khatawate, Mr. [29]. Prof. Pinank A. Patel, Vivek G. Patel & Dr. Shashikant
Gajendra & V. Patil, International Journal of Mechanical S. Khandare, International Journal of Advanced Research in
Engineering and Technology (IJMET), Volume 4, Issue 4, Engineering And Technology (IJARET), Volume 4, Issue 2
July - August (2013) . March – April 2013, pp. 119-124.
[12]. Eswara Kumar. , ShahidnAfridi., Sai Vamsi & G R [30]. Eswara Kumar. A, G R Sanjay Krishna, Shahid Afridi.
Sanjay Krishn , International Journal of Pure and Applied P & Nagaraju M , International Journal of Civil Engineering
Mathematics , Volume 115 No. 8 2017, 371-376. and Technology (IJCIET)Volume 8, Issue 4, April 2017, pp.
[13]. Sanagondla Bugide Ramu, Dr. Y. V. Mohan Reddy, 916–934.
International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, [31]. Kuo-Long Lee, Li-Yang Chen & Wen-Fung Pan,
Engineering and Technology , Vol. 6, Issue 7, July 2017. International Journal of Engineering Innovation & Research
[14]. Mr. P. Ramakrishna Reddy, Mr. A. Prashanth & Mr. D. Volume 5, Issue 1.
Suresh Reddy, International Journal of Research, Volume [32]. Al Faizal .B, Amarnath T S & Roshan T Ninan,
04 Issue-17 December 2017. International Journal of Engineering Trends and
[15]. Dr. Majid Hameed Majeed, Journal of Engineering, Technology (IJETT) – Volume 17 Number 5 – Nov 2014.
Number 11 Volume 21 November – 2015. [33]. E. Lakshmi Devi, V. Hari Shankar, International
[16]. S. C. Bergsma, M. E. Kassner, X. Li, & R.S. Rosen, 3rd Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT) –
International Conference on Processing and Manufacturing Volume-42 Number-5 - December 2016.
Advanced Materials, Las Vegas, NV, December 4-8, 2000 [34]. Deepak Sandar. M, Sunkara Yasasvi, International
[17]. Timothy D. Ponshock, Master Thesis, Naval Journal for Innovative Research in Science & Technology
Postgraduate School December 2015. (IJIRST), Volume 3, Issue 11, April 2017.
[18]. G. T. Yahr, Engineering Technology Division, Oak [35]. Gondi PrabhuCharan Teja, K. V. P. P. Chandu, Ch.
Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831- Rama Krishna & K. Yasoda Sreeram, International
8051. Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET),
[19]. Yeddula Suvarna & B. Ravisekhar, International Volume: 03 Issue: 12 , Dec -2016.
Journal of Science Technology and Management , Vol. No. [36]. P. Prasanna, B. Subba Rao & G. Krishna Mohana Rao,
05 , Issue No. 09, September 2016. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences , VOL.
[20]. Hiren Dhameliya, M. C. Karia , A. M. Lakhani & D. 5, NO. 6, JUNE 2010.
D. Kundaliya, International Journal of Advance Research in [37]. Justin D. Francis, Master of Science, Virginia
Engineering, Science & Technology (IJAREST),Volume 2, Polytechnic Institute and State University, April 2002 ,
Issue 5, May- 2015. Blacksburg, Virginia.
[21]. P. Ravikanth Raju & K. Chinna Maddaiah, [38]. Dr. H. D. Gopalakrishna, Jayghosh S. Rao, Shruthi N.
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), Kumar, Vishwajith V. Shetty & Karthik Rai, IOSR Journal
Volume 5 Issue 10, October 2016. of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE,
[22]. M.Balu, K. Rajanikanth, B.Bhaskar & B.Santosh, Volume 11, Issue 2 Ver. VII (Mar- Apr. 2014), PP 78-83.
Proceedings of the 1st National Conference on Innovative [39]. Claire R. Luttrell, Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
approaches in Mechanical Engineering , NCIAME-17 , Sept [40]. Aziz ÖNDER, Dokuz Eylül University Graduate
22-23, 2017, Hyderabad, India. School of Natural And Applied Sciences.
[23]. Medhavi Sinha & Dr. S. N. Pandit, International [41]. Mr. Trishul Sawant , Prof. Nikhil K Purwant , Prof.
Journal of Advances in Engineering Science and Sachin Kulkarni & Prof. Prashant Karajagi, International
Technology, ISSN-2319-1120 /IJAEST/V1N1:35-40 Engineering Research Journal Page No 338-343.
©IJAEST. [42]. Shanmugavel. M & Velmurugan. T, IOSR Journal of
[24]. Mohamed Abdusalam Hussin, Er. Prabhat Kumar Sinha Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE) e-ISSN:
& Dr. Arvind Saran Darbari, International Journal of 2278-1684, p-ISSN: 2320-334X PP 73-77.
Mechanical Engineering And Technology (IJMET), [43]. Vu Tran-Viet, Master Thesis, Universitat Politècnica de
Volume 5, Issue 10, October (2014), pp. 57-69. Catalunya.
[25]. Hamza A. Ghulman, International Journal of Scientific [44]. P Sreejesh & P J Manoj, 4th International Coference on
& Engineering Research, Volume 8, Issue 5, May-2017 Recent Trends in Engineering Science and Management ,
[26]. Kyle Matthew Pender, Master Of Science, Raleigh, The International Centre Goa, Panjim ,Goa (India), 7th
North Carolina 2014. August 2016.
[27]. Mahantesh. Matur, V. Krishnan & P. Dinesh, IOSR [45]. Mallela Vijay & Rajashakar Reddy , International
Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR- Journal Of Innovative Research in Science and Engineering
, Vol. No. 02, Issue 01, January 2016.

IJISRT18JU299 www.ijisrt.com 361


Volume 3, Issue 6, June – 2018 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
[46]. Mahendiali Khorajiya, Mohammadhasan Agharia,
Farhan Manasiya & Mahedihasan Madania, International
Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.4, No.3,
March 2016.
[47]. Robert Michael Jones, Master's Theses, San Jose State
University.
[48]. Honggang Yang, Haijun Yang & Xin Zhao, 4th
International Conference on Mechatronics, Materials,
Chemistry and Computer Engineering (ICMMCCE 2015)
[49]. Karoline Bratteng & Eirik Søreng, Master of Science,
The Arctic University of Norway.
[50]. Bob Wands, Thermal and Stress Analysis of Numi
Decay Pipe Thin Head, MSG-EAR-02317, July 16, 2002.
[51]. K. Chinna Maddaiah, P. Ravikanth Raju & Mohammed
Ali, International Journal of Engineering Research &
Technology (IJERT), Vol. 5 Issue 09, September-2016.
[52]. Pu-Woei Chen, Shu-Han Chang & Jyun-Yuan Siao,
Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical
Engineering, Vol. 37, No. 4, 2013.
[53]. Reshma Ramesh, Asha Joseph, American Journal of
Engineering Research (AJER), Volume-6, Issue-7, pp-241-
250.
[54]. Aluminium Alloy 6061-T6 Extrusions, Aalco is a
registered trademark of Aalco Metals Ltd, Aalco Metals
Ltd, 25 High Street, Cobham, Surrey KT11 3DH.
[55]. Fish J., Belytschko T. - A First Course In Finite
Elements (Wiley, 2007).
[56]. ANSYS WB FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS - Boxing
punch of a plastic skull with mouth guard (trial)(
https://www.pinterest.com/pin/485051822346096121/).
[57]. Mehrnoosh Khabiri, Design and Simulation of
Implantable PIFA in Presence of ANSYS Human Body
Model for Biomedical Telemetry Using ANSYS HFSS,
OZEN ENGINEERING, INC. 1210 E. Arques Ave. Suite:
207 Sunnyvale, CA 94085.
[58]. Rasoul Moradi, Rajarshi Setpally, Hamid M.
Lankarani, Applied Mathematics Vol.4 No.5A(2013),8
pages.
[59]. Daily News, Page 1, Friday, March 30, 2001,
Combatsystem.com.
[60]. Johan Homan and Claes Johnson , Resolution of
d'Alembert's Paradox, May 20, 2008.
[61]. Igor Kokcharov, Chapter 9 Composite, Structure
Integrity Analysis.
[62]. Puran Singh, Finite Element Analysis of Pilot’s Helmet
Design Using Composite Materials for Military Aircraft, J.
Aerosp. Technol. Manag. vol.8 no.1 São José dos Campos
Jan./Mar. 2016.
[63]. Emir Dzubur, Modeling and testing of small diameter
composite tubes under hydrostatic pressure, Norwegian
University of Science and Technology, 2014.

IJISRT18JU299 www.ijisrt.com 362

You might also like