Skip to main content

Inguinal Hernia Repair – Update 2006

  • Chapter
EAES Guidelines for Endoscopic Surgery

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bittner R, Sauerland S, Schmedt CG (2005) Comparison of endoscopic techniques vs Shouldice and other open nonmesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized cofntrolled trials. Surg Endosc 19:605–615

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chung RS, Rowland DY (1999) Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic vs conventional inguinal hernia repairs. Surg Endosc 13:689–694

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2000) Laparoscopic compared with open methods of groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Surg 87:860–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2000) Mesh compared with non-mesh methods of open groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Surg 87:854–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2002) Repair of groin hernia with synthetic mesh: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 235:322–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Grant AM (2002) Laparoscopic versus open groin hernia repair: meta-analysis of randomised trials based on individual patient data. Hernia 6:2–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lau H, Patil NG, Chan-Wing Lee F (2003) Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials comparing endoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty with open repair of inguinal hernia repair. Ann Coll Surg 7:2–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. McCormack K, Scott NW (2003) Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD001785

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McCormack K, Wake B, Perez J, Fraser C, Cook J, McIntosh E, Vale L (2005) Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 9:1–203, iii–iv

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Memon MA, Cooper NJ, Memon B, Memon MI, Abrams KR (2003) Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 90:1479–1492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Miltenburg DM, Nuchtern JG, Jaksic T, Kozinetz CA, Brandt ML (1997) Meta-analysis of the risk of metachronous hernia in infants and children. Am J Surg 174:741–744

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schmedt CG, Leibl BJ, Bittner R (2002) Endoscopic inguinal hernia repair in comparison with Shouldice and Lichtenstein repair. A systematic review of randomized trials. Dig Surg 19:511–517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schmedt CG, Sauerland S, Bittner R (2005) Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 19:188–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Scott NW, McCormack K, Graham P, Go PM, Ross SJ, Grant AM (2002) Open mesh versus non-mesh for repair of femoral and inguinal hernia. Cochrane Database Rev CD002197

    Google Scholar 

  15. Voyles CR, Hamilton BJ, Johnson WD, Kano N (2002) Meta-analysis of laparoscopic inguinal hernia trials favors open hernia repair with preperitoneal mesh prosthesis. Am J Surg 184:6–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Grunwaldt LLJ, Schwaitzberg SD, Rattner DW, Jones DB (2005) Is laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair an operation of the past? J Am Coll Surg 200:616–620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fingerhut A, Millat B, Bataille N, Yachouchi E, Dziri C, Boudet MJ, Paul A (2001) Laparoscopic hernia repair in 2000. Update of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) Consensus Conference in Madrid, June 1994. Surg Endosc 15:1061–1065

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dickersin K, Scherer R, Lefebvre C (1994) Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. BMJ 309:1286–1291

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tumber M, Dickersin K (2004) Publication of clinical trials: accountability and accessibility. J Intern Med 256:271–283

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Neumayer L, Giobbe-Hurder A, Johansson O, Fitzgibbons R Jr, Dunlop D, Gibbs J, Reda D, Henderson W (2004) Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Eng J Med 350:1819–1827

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Stengel D, Bauwens K, Ekkernkamp A (2004) Recurrence risks in randomized trials of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: to pool or not to pool (this is not the question). Langenbecks Arch Surg 389:492–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. MRC Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group (1999) Laparoscopic versus open repair of groin hernia: a randomised comparison. Lancet 354:185–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. DeTurris SV, Cacchione RN, Mungara A, Pecoraro A, Ferzli GS (2002) Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy: beyond the learning curve. J Am Coll Surg 194:65–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Neumayer LA, Gawande AA, Wang J, Giobbie-Hurder A, Itani KM, Fitzgibbons RJ, Reda D, Jonasson O (2005) Proficiency of surgeons in inguinal hernia repair: effect of experience and age. Ann Surg 242:344–348

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hay JM, Boudet MJ, Fingerhut A, Poucher J, Hennet H, Habib E, Veyrieres M, Flamant Y (1995) Shouldice inguinal hernia repair in the male adult: the gold standard? A multicenter controlled trial in 1578 patients. Ann Surg 222:719–727

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bringman S, Ramel Heikkinen TJ, Englund T, Westman B, Anderberg B (2003) Tension-free inguinal hernia repair. TEP versus mesh-plug versus Lichtenstein (a prospective randomized trial). Ann Surg 237:142–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Page B, Paterson D, Young D, O'Dwyer PJ (2002) Pain from primary inguinal hernia and the effect of repair on pain. Br J Surg 89:1315–1318

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Poobalan AS, Bruce J, Smith WC, King PM, Krukowski ZH, Chambers WA (2003) A review of chronic pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy. Clin J Pain 19:48–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kehlet H, Bay-Nielsen M, Kingsnorth A (2002) Chronic postherniorrhaphy pain—a call for uniform assessment. Hernia 6:178–181

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. McCarthy M, Chang CH, Pickard AS, Giobbie-Hurder A, Price DD, Jonasson O, Gibbs J, Fitzgibbons R, Neumayer L (2005) Visual analog scales for assessing surgical pain. J Am Coll Surg 201:245–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. O'Dwyer PJ, Alani A, McConnachie A (2005) Groin hernia repair: postherniorrhaphy pain. World J Surg 20:1062–1065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Arregui ME, Young SB (2005) Groin hernia repair by laparoscopic techniques: current status and controversies. World J Surg 29:1052–1057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ferzli GS, Frezza EE, Pecoraro AM Jr, Ahern KD (1999) Prospective randomized study of stapled versus unstapled mesh in a laparoscopic preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 188:461–465

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Moreno-Egea A, Torralba Martinez JA, Morales Cuenca G, Aguayo Albasini JL (2004) Randomized clinical trial of fixation vs nonfixation of mesh in total extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty. Arch Surg 139:1376–1379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Parshad R, Kumar R, Hazrah P, Bal S (2005) A randomized comparison of the early outcome of stapled and unstapled techniques of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. JSLS 9:403–407

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Smith AI, Royston CM, Sedman PC (1999) Stapled and nonstapled laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair. A prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 13:804–806

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Katkhouda N, Mavor E, Friedlander MH, Mason RJ, Kiyabu M, Grant SW, Achanta K, Kirkman EL, Narayanan K, Essani R (2001) Use of fibrin sealant for prosthetic mesh fixation in laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Ann Surg 233:18–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Novik B, Hagedorn S, Mork UB, Dahlin K, Skullman S, Dalenback J (2006) Fibrin glue for securing the mesh in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a study with a 40-month prospective follow-up period. Surg Endosc 20:462–467

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Motson RW (2002) Why does NICE not recommend laparoscopic herniorraphy? BMJ 324:1092–1094

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Vale L, Grant A, McCormack K, Scott NW (2004) Cost-effectiveness of alternative methods of surgical repair of inguinal hernia. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 17:192–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Rutkow IM (2003) Demographic and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States in 2003. Surg Clin North Am 83:1045–1051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Chung RS (2005) How much time do surgical residents need to learn operative surgery? Am J Surg 190:351–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kingsnorth A (2005) Introduction to current practice of adult hernia repair. World J Surg 29:1044–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Koperna T (2004) How long do we need teaching in the operating room? The true costs of achieving surgical routine. Langenbecks Arch Surg 389:204–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Reyes DAG, Tang B, Cuschieri A (2006) Minimal access surgery (MAS)-related surgeon morbidity syndromes. Surg Endosc 20:1–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Ferzli GS, Fingerhut A (2004) Trocar placement for laparoscopic abdominal procedures: a simple standardized method. J Am Coll Surg 198:163–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Friedman DM, Sokal SM, Chang Y, Berger DL (2006) Increasing operating room efficiency through parallel processing. Ann Surg 243:10–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kenyon TA, Urbach DR, Speer JB, Waterman-Hukari B, Foraker GF, Hansen PD, Swanstrom LL (2001) Dedicated minimally invasive surgery suites increase operating room efficiency. Surg Endosc 15:1140–1143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Kaafarani HMA, Itani KMF, Giobbie-Hurder A, Gleysteen JJ, McCarthy M, Gibbs J, Neumayer L (2005) Does surgeon frustration and satisfaction with the operation predict outcomes of open or laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair? J Am Coll Surg 200:677–683

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Fingerhut A, Chouillard E (2005) Ergonomic and technical aspects of laparoscopy for trauma and non trauma emergencies. J Eur Surg 37:8–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Bloor K, Freemantle N, Khadjesari Z, Maynard A (2003) Impact of NICE guidelines on laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernias: analysis of interrupted time series. Br Med J 326:578–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Giobbie-Hurder A, Gibbs JO, Dunlop DD, Reda DJ, McCarthy M Jr, Neumayer LA, Barkun JS, Hoehn JL, Murphy JT, Sarosi GA Jr, Syme WC, Thompson JS, Wang J, Jonasson O (2006) Watchful waiting vs repair of inguinal hernia in minimally symptomatic men: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 295:285–292

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Wara P, Bay-Nielsen M, Juul P, Bendix J, Kehlet H (2005) Prospective nationwide analysis of laparoscopic versus Lichtenstein repair of inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 92:1277–1281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Amid PK (2005) Groin hernia repair: open techniques. World J Surg 29:1046–1051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Erdogru T, Teber D, Frede T, Marrero R, Hammady A, Rassweiler J (2005) The effect of previous transperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy on transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 173:769–772

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Stolzenburg JU, Anderson C, Rabenalt R, Do M, Ho K, Truss MC (2005) Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer and previous laparoscopic inguinal mesh placement for hernia repair. World J Urol 23:295–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Tocchi A, Liotta G, Mazzoni G, Lepre L, Costa G, Maggiolini F, Miccini M (1998) [Learning curve for “tension-free” reparation of inguinal hernia]. G Chir 19:199–203

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

E.A.M. Neugebauer S. Sauerland A. Fingerhut B. Millat G. Buess

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fingerhut, A., Millat, B., Veyrie, N., Chouillard, E., Dziri, C. (2006). Inguinal Hernia Repair – Update 2006. In: Neugebauer, E., Sauerland, S., Fingerhut, A., Millat, B., Buess, G. (eds) EAES Guidelines for Endoscopic Surgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32784-4_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32784-4_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-32783-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32784-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics