OPINION SURVEY ON LINES OF ACTION AND STRATEGIES FOR A  JOURNALISM PROTECTION MECHANISMS - JPM
Mr./Mrs./Miss
The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization - UNESCO actively promotes the safety of those who produce journalism and believes that they have the right to work free from the threat of violence and to ensure the right to Freedom of Expression and Opinion for all.

We are conducting a survey on the essential elements in the structure of a protection mechanism for those who perform the practice of journalism and Freedom of Expression; in this regard your collaboration will be important.

We request your opinion on the following proposals, which have five answer choices, please mark the answer according to your criteria.

• Absolutely agree. No doubt the application is appropriate.
• Agree. It is applicable, it should not be left to take into account.
• No opinion. It does not matter whether to apply or not.
• Disagree. This should not apply for political, legal, technical reasons, etc.
• Absolutely disagree. No doubt, it is not appropriate.

The survey is very brief and will only take about 5 minutes to complete.  Your participation in the survey is completely voluntary and all of your responses will be kept confidential. Should you have  any comments or questions, please feel free to contact me at: l.armas@unesco.org

We appreciate your kind cooperation, emphasizing the value of your opinions on this matter.

Sincerely,

UNESCO Guatemala

Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
1. Despite the magnitude of possible difficulties, the JPM should prepare systematic and permanent measures to anticipate or reduce the risks or damages that may occur in the exercise of Freedom of Expression and Opinion.
Clear selection
2. Despite the magnitude of possible difficulties, the JPM should ensure the safeguarding, defense or protection of  people performing  the right to freedom of expression and opinion, in a more specific way (physical) and abstract (legal or regulatory framework).
Clear selection
3. Despite the systematic violation and disrespect of human and constitutional rights prevailing in many contexts, the JPM should be supported by research institutions of crimes against the exercise of Freedom of Expression and Opinion, who manage and seek speedy and transparent justice where appropriate.
Clear selection
4. Although the JPM should be repealed at a certain time, it must be supported by a State Policy that permanently (transcending governments) directs the protection to the exercise of Freedom of Expression and Opinion.
Clear selection
5. Although it should not exist, the JPM must be supported by a National Law requiring observe compliance on the parties without exception, the protection to the exercise of Freedom of Expression and Opinion.
Clear selection
6. Essentially and Independently of any kind of difficulty, the JPM should become an institution created by the State and supported by a National Law that gives political-administrative attributes for the execution of its lines of action regarding the exercise of the right to Freedom of Expression and Opinion.
Clear selection
7. Essentially and independently of any kind of difficulty, the JPM’s institutionalization, must have autonomy to provide the maximum power of initiative and self-management to decide and implement actions on their protective function of the exercise of Freedom of Expression and Opinion.
Clear selection
8. Despite the bureaucratic nature of many organizations and public and private institutions, the JPM, for operating purposes, must agree with the same and different economy and society sectors, resources and efforts to optimize results in protecting the exercise of Freedom of Expression and Opinion.
Clear selection
9. Regardless of the territorial extension of a given context, JPM must be organized and operate in different territorial levels (national, regional, departmental, municipal and local) in order to ensure ability, effectiveness and efficiency for the protection of the exercise of Freedom of Expression and Opinion.
Clear selection
10. Despite the difficulties of the JPM, it must set up the dynamics of its lines of action, based on a systemic approach or as a set of institutional and organizational elements interacting in a comprehensive way to ensure ability, effectiveness and efficiency for the protection of the exercise of Freedom of Expression and Opinion.
Clear selection
11. Despite the difficulties of the JPM, it must set the dynamics of its lines of action based on an operational interface (executing units and mechanisms of institutional and organizational elements that must integrate) to interact in order to ensure ability, effectiveness and efficiency for the protection of the exercise of Freedom of Expression and Opinion.
Clear selection
12. As an institution created by the State and supported by an Organic Law that provides political and administrative implementation of its lines of action, the JPM must have a clear and objective (strategy), vision for its own future, regardless of the difficulties that it might face
Clear selection
13. As an institution created by the State and supported by a National law that provides political and administrative implementation of its lines of action, the JPM must have its own resources available by the State and guarantee its organizational and functional self-sufficiency.
Clear selection
14. The JPM, must integrate the different national and civil society organizations in its institutional and sectoral system.
Clear selection
15. The JPM, must operate based on the precepts of gender equity or equal opportunities for men and women.
Clear selection
Submit
Clear form
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
Google Forms