Survey: Quality Assisted Editor(FA, Moon, Wiki Expert)
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
The introduction is written in an understandable and engaging way *
(well-written)
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
The introduction has enough references included *
(well-researched)
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
The introduction has enough media files (images, videos, etc) included *
(Media)
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
The introduction is written in a neutral way *
It presents views fairly and without bias (neutral)
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
The introduction has enough internal Wiki-links included *
(comprehensive)
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
The introduction has an appropriate length comparing to the whole article *
(length, lead)
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
The overall quality of the Introduction is very high *
(length, lead)
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
The introduciton summarizes the topic very well *
(a lead)
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
The section In culture is written in an understandable and engaging way *
Please go to the section In culture with the aid of the tool you have on hand (well-written)
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
The section In culture has enough Media (Images, Videos, etc.) files like images included *
(Media)
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
The section In culture has enough references included *
(well-researched)
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
The section In culture has enough internal Wiki-links included *
(comprehensive)
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
The overall quality of the section In culture is very high *
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
The section In culture is written in a neutral way *
It presents views fairly and without bias (neutral)
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
The section Atmosphere is written in an understandable and engaging way *
(well-written)
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
The section Atmosphere has enough Media (Images, Videos, etc.) files like images included *
(Media)
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
The section Atmosphere has enough references included *
(well-researched)
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
The section Atmosphere has enough internal Wiki-links included *
(comprehensive)
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
The section Atmosphere has an appropriate length *
(length)
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
The overall quality of the section Atmosphere  is very high *
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
The section Atmosphere is written in a neutral way *
It presents views fairly and without bias (neutral)
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
The article conveys the feeling that it contains all necessary information about the topic *
Please take a look at the article with the tool you have on hand, before you are answering the question. (comprehensive)
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
The article is written in a neutral way *
It presents views fairly and without bias (neutral)
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
The article is written in an understandable and engaging way *
(well-written)
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
The article has an appropriate length *
The main topic should be sufficiently described without focusing on unnecessary details (Length)
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
The article has enough images included *
(Media)
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
The table of content is appropriate for the article *
(appropriate structure)
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
All parts of the article which need a citation are cited *
(well-researched)
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
The overall quality of the article is very high *
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
Any Comments?
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy