A judge shot down Robin Thicke’s request for unsupervised visits with his 6-year-old son Wednesday after the singer rushed to court amid a nasty custody battle with ex-wife Paula Patton.
Lawyers for the “Blurred Lines” artist claimed in filings obtained by the Daily News that Thicke was robbed of a visit last week by an overzealous monitor and doesn’t need monitoring at all, despite a recent court order.
“There is no need for a monitor. I have never done anything to harm Julian, and I never would,” he said in a sworn statement. “(Julian’s) health, safety and well-being are more important than my own. I love him very much, and I am a good father to him.”
Thicke, 39, said he and his son swam, watched TV and played with their dogs during a Jan. 27 visit that went well.
“At no point did Julian indicate to me or the monitor that he was scared, uncomfortable or that he wanted to leave,” Thicke said.
Thicke said during a visit on Feb. 2, Julian initially said he didn’t want to return to the singer’s house. They went and picked fruit instead, and Julian later asked to return to the house, Thicke said.
He claimed the monitor cancelled a visit the next day — Feb. 3 — saying it was not in Julian’s “best interest.”
Another previously planned visit on Feb. 4 got derailed because Patton allegedly forgot it was Thicke’s custodial time and had promised their son she would take him to Chinatown, the filing states.
Julian seemed disappointed when Thicke suggested they go to venues called Kids World and Malibu Wine Safari instead, the paperwork claims.
He said they visited Kids World, where they rode on slides, played arcade games and ate Pop Rocks candy and ice cream. Julian asked to leave when Thicke declined to give him more candy before eating “decent meal,” the filing claims. The monitor then allowed Julian to end the visit, he said.
He called the experience “extremely upsetting” and asked that the monitor be removed, replaced or simply prohibited from cancelling or changing scheduled visits.
The judge shut him down, saying all orders would remain in place pending a hearing on Feb. 24.
Patton was awarded temporary custody of the young boy at the end of January after filing a restraining order against Thicke.
In a sworn statement, she accused the singer of abusing drugs and booze, regularly bedding other women and having a raging, violent temper.
The judge who signed the temporary restraining order acknowledged that Thicke “has a history of domestic violence.”
Thicke, however, denied the allegations and accused Patton of “suddenly … withholding Julian.”
“I believe Paula’s sudden ardent opposition to me spending time with Julian is a product of residual anger she holds toward me. Neither my family nor I would permit Paula or her family to attend the funeral of my father on December 20, 2016,” he wrote in a sworn statement.
Paula did not have a positive relationship with my father and often made negative comments to me about my father,” he said. “It is my belief that Paula only wanted to attend because it would have resulted in additional public exposure for her.”
Patton also accused Thicke of hitting Julian, which the singer admitted to but said it wasn’t a common occurrence.
“I have always used progressive discipline with Julian, primarily the use of timeouts. On a very rare occasion, and only as a last resort, I will use light spanking,” he wrote in a statement signed Jan. 25.
“It is consistent with the law — open hand on the butt.
“I have never exceeded age-appropriate discipline, and this has never been an issue, nor has it been raised by Paula at any time previously.”
Thicke’s current custody agreement allows him to see Julian three times a week on Thursday, Friday and Saturday.