skip to main content
10.1145/2487166.2487182acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagese-energyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Dynamic provisioning in next-generation data centers with on-site power production

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 May 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

The critical need for clean and economical sources of energy is transforming data centers that are primarily energy consumers to also energy producers. We focus on minimizing the operating costs of next-generation data centers that can jointly optimize the energy supply from on-site generators and the power grid, and the energy demand from servers as well as power conditioning and cooling systems. We formulate the cost minimization problem and present an offline optimal algorithm. For "on-grid" data centers that use only the grid, we devise a deterministic online algorithm that achieves the best possible competitive ratio of 2αs, where αs is a normalized look-ahead window size. The competitive ratio of an online algorithm is defined as the maximum ratio (over all possible inputs) between the algorithm's cost (with no or limited look-ahead) and the offline optimal assuming complete future information. We remark that the results hold as long as the overall energy demand (including server, cooling, and power conditioning) is a convex and increasing function in the total number of active servers and also in the total server load. For "hybrid" data centers that have on-site power generation in addition to the grid, we develop an online algorithm that achieves a competitive ratio of at most Pmax(2--αs)/co+cm/L [1+2 Pmax--co/Pmax(1+αg], where αs and αg are normalized look-ahead window sizes, Pmax is the maximum grid power price, and L, co, and cm are parameters of an on-site generator.

Using extensive workload traces from Akamai with the corresponding grid power prices, we simulate our offline and online algorithms in a realistic setting. Our offline (resp., online) algorithm achieves a cost reduction of 25.8% (resp., 20.7%) for a hybrid data center and 12.3% (resp., 7.3%) for an on-grid data center. The cost reductions are quite significant and make a strong case for a joint optimization of energy supply and energy demand in a data center. A hybrid data center provides about 13% additional cost reduction over an on-grid data center representing the additional cost benefits that on-site power generation provides over using the grid alone.

References

  1. Akamai tech. http://www.akamai.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Nationalgrid. https://www.nationalgridus.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Pacific gas and electric company. http://www.pge.com/nots/rates/tariffs/rateinfo.shtml.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Tecogen. http://www.tecogen.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. The weather channal. http://www.weather.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Apple's onsite renewable energy, 2012. http://www.apple.com/environment/renewable-energy/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Distributed generation, 2012. http://www.bloomenergy.com/fuel-cell/distributed-generation/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. C. Baldwin, K. Dale, and R. Dittrich. A study of the economic shutdown of generating units in daily dispatch. IEEE Trans. Power Apparatus and Systems, 1959.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. L. Barroso and U. Holzle. The case for energy-proportional computing. IEEE Computer, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. A. Beloglazov, R. Buyya, Y. Lee, and A. Zomaya. A taxonomy and survey of energy-efficient data centers and cloud computing systems. Advances in Computers, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. A. Borbely and J. Kreider. Distributed generation: the power paradigm for the new millennium. CRC Press, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. A. Borodin and R. El-Yaniv. Online computation and competitive analysis. Cambridge University Press, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. J. Chase, D. Anderson, P. Thakar, A. Vahdat, and R. Doyle. Managing energy and server resources in hosting centers. In Proc. ACM SIGOPS, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. A.J. Conejo, M.A. Plazas, R. Espinola, and A.B. Molina. Day-ahead electricity price forecasting using the wavelet transform and arima models. Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. E. Dijkstra. A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische mathematik, 1959.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. R. Doyle, J. Chase, O. Asad, W. Jin, and A. Vahdat. Model-based resource provisioning in a web service utility. In Proc. USITS, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. K. Fehrenbacher. ebay to build huge bloom energy fuel cell farm at data center. 2012. http://gigaom.com/cleantech/ebay-to-build-huge-bloom-energy-fuel-cell-farm-at-data-center/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. K. Fehrenbacher. Is it time for more off-grid options for data centers?. 2012. http://gigaom.com/cleantech/is-it-time-for-more-off-grid-options-for-data-centers/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Daniel Gmach, Jerry Rolia, Ludmila Cherkasova, and Alfons Kemper. Workload analysis and demand prediction of enterprise data center applications. In Workload Characterization, 2007. IISWC 2007. IEEE 10th International Symposium on, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. S. Kazarlis, A. Bakirtzis, and V. Petridis. A genetic algorithm solution to the unit commitment problem. IEEE Trans. Power Systems, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. J. Koomey. Growth in data center electricity use 2005 to 2010. Analytics Press, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. M. Lin, Z. Liu, A. Wierman, and L. Andrew. Online algorithms for geographical load balancing. In Proc. IEEE IGCC, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. M. Lin, A. Wierman, L. Andrew, and E. Thereska. Dynamic right-sizing for power-proportional data centers. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Z. Liu, Y. Chen, C. Bash, A. Wierman, D. Gmach, Z. Wang, M. Marwah, and C. Hyser. Renewable and cooling aware workload management for sustainable data centers. In Proc. ACM SIGMETRICS, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. J. Lowesohn. Apple's main data center to go fully renewable this year. 2012. http://news.cnet.com/8301--13579\textunderscore 3-57436553-37/apples-main-data-center-to-go-fully-renewable-this-year/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. L. Lu, J. Tu, C. Chau, M. Chen, and X. Lin. Online energy generation scheduling for microgrids with intermittent energy sources and co-generation. In Proc. ACM SIGMETRICS, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. T. Lu and Chen M. Simple and effective dynamic provisioning for power-proportional data centers. In Proc. IEEE CISS, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. V. Mathew, R. Sitaraman, and P. Shenoy. Energy-aware load balancing in content delivery networks. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. J. Muckstadt and R. Wilson. An application of mixed-integer programming duality to scheduling thermal generating systems. IEEE Trans. Power Apparatus and Systems, 1968.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. E. Nygren, R. Sitaraman, and J. Sun. The Akamai Network: A platform for high-performance Internet applications. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. N. Padhy. Unit commitment-a bibliographical survey. IEEE Trans. Power Systems, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. D. Palasamudram, R. Sitaraman, B. Urgaonkar, and R. Urgaonkar. Using batteries to reduce the power costs of internet-scale distributed networks. In Proc. ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. S. Pelley, D. Meisner, T. Wenisch, and J. VanGilder. Understanding and abstracting total data center power. In Workshop on Energy-Efficient Design, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. E. Pinheiro, R. Bianchini, E. Carrera, and T. Heath. Load balancing and unbalancing for power and performance in cluster-based systems. In Workshop on compilers and operating systems for low power, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. A. Qureshi, R. Weber, H. Balakrishnan, J. Guttag, and B. Maggs. Cutting the electric bill for internet-scale systems. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. T. Shiina and J. Birge. Stochastic unit commitment problem. International Trans. Operational Research, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. M. Stadler, H. Aki, R. Lai, C. Marnay, and A. Siddiqui. Distributed energy resources on-site optimization for commercial buildings with electric and thermal storage technologies. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. R. Stanojevic and R. Shorten. Distributed dynamic speed scaling. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. J. Tu, L. Lu, M. Chen, and R. Sitaraman. Dynamic provisioning in next-generation data centers with on-site power production. Technical report, Department of Information Engineering, CUHK, 2013. http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.6775.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. H. Xu, C. Feng, and B. Li. Temperature aware workload management in geo-distributed datacenters. In Proc. ACM SIGMETRICS, extended abstract, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Dynamic provisioning in next-generation data centers with on-site power production

                Recommendations

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in
                • Published in

                  cover image ACM Conferences
                  e-Energy '13: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Future energy systems
                  January 2013
                  306 pages
                  ISBN:9781450320528
                  DOI:10.1145/2487166

                  Copyright © 2013 ACM

                  Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                  Publisher

                  Association for Computing Machinery

                  New York, NY, United States

                  Publication History

                  • Published: 21 May 2013

                  Permissions

                  Request permissions about this article.

                  Request Permissions

                  Check for updates

                  Qualifiers

                  • research-article

                  Acceptance Rates

                  e-Energy '13 Paper Acceptance Rate40of76submissions,53%Overall Acceptance Rate160of446submissions,36%

                  Upcoming Conference

                  e-Energy '24

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader