Dhoti controversy taken to Madras High Court

July 17, 2014 12:00 am | Updated 08:32 am IST - CHENNAI:

PIL petition wants functioning of clubs in State regulated

The controversy over the TNCA Club denying entry to a sitting judge and two advocates for coming to a function here in dhoti came up before the Madras High Court on Wednesday.

A city advocate has filed a public interest litigation petition for a directive to the State government to regulate the functioning of clubs in the State.

He also wanted the government to suspend the licence of the club in question.

In the petition, S. Karthik of Chromepet said the judge (Justice D. Hariparanthaman) and two senior advocates went to the TNCA Club on July 11 for a book release function.

Newspapers reported that the three were refused entry into the function hall as they were attired in dhoti, a traditional dress. The action was against the fundamental rights and against the civil and cultural rights of Tamils. Clubs could not frame rules or regulations prescribing the dress code, which were without any legal sanctity.

Insignia of heritage

Dhoti was a traditional dress and the insignia of Indian heritage.

The tradition of wearing dhoti was being followed since time immemorial, the petitioner said.

Mr. Karthik submitted that the rules framed by clubs infringed on the fundamental rights of individuals and they were illegal.

The club’s action of framing rules that were discriminatory in restricting a person solely on grounds of his personal attire was liable to be struck down since discrimination in any form could not be allowed to be practised in India. When the matter came up before the First Bench of the Acting Chief Justice, Satish K. Agnihotri, and Justice M.M. Sundresh, Mr. Justice Agnihotri asked counsel how the petition was maintainable.

Counsel said the club’s action amounted to violation of fundamental rights. The ACJ observed that the association was a private body and it had framed the rules.

Issue raised in House

He wanted to know how it would affect the rights. When counsel pointed out that the matter was raised in the Assembly, he said the legislature was the competent authority to look into the matter.

The Bench later ordered that the petition be posted before some other Division Bench where Justice M.M. Sundresh was not a party.

Dhoti is a traditional dress and the insignia of Indian heritage: petitioner

Legislature is the competent authority to look into the matter: Acting CJ

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.