Media Effective reach
Represents
percentage of a vehicle’s audience reached at each effective frequency
increment. This concept is based on the assumption that one exposure to an ad
may not be enough to convey the desired message.
No
one knows the exact number of exposures necessary for an ad to make an impact,
although advertisers have settled on three as the minimum.
Effective
reach (exposure) is shown in the shaded area in Figure 10-22 in the range of 3
to 10 exposures.
Fewer
than 3 exposures are considered insufficient reach, while more than 10 is
considered over exposure and thus ineffective reach.
This
exposure level is no guarantee of effective communication; different messages
may require more or fewer exposures.
For example, Jack Myers, president of Myers Reports, argues that the
three-exposure theory was valid in the 1970s when consumers were exposed to
approximately 1,000 ads per day.
Now that they are exposed to 3,000 to 5,000 per day, three exposures may
not be enough. Adding in the fragmentation of television, the proliferation of
magazines, and the advent of a variety of alternative media leads Myers to
believe that 12 exposures may be the minimum level of frequency required.
Also, Jim Surmanek, vice president of International Communications
Group, contends that the complexity of the message, message length, and recency
of exposure also impact this figure.
Determining effective reach is further complicated by the fact that when
calculating GRPs, advertisers use a figure that they call
Media Average frequency
Average frequency the
average number of times the target audience reached by a media schedule is
exposed to the vehicle over a specified period.
The
problem with this figure is revealed in the following scenario, consider a
media buy in which:
50
percent of audience is reached 1 time.
30
percent of audience is reached 5 times.
20
percent of audience is reached 10 times.
Average
frequency = 4
In
this media buy, the average frequency is 4, which is slightly more than the
number established as effective. Yet a full 50 percent of the audience receives
only one exposure. Thus, the average-frequency number can be misleading, and
using it to calculate GRPs might result in underexposing the audience.
The
best advice for purchasing GRPs is offered by Ostrow, who recommends the
following strategies:
Instead
of using average frequency, the marketer should decide what minimum frequency goal
is needed to reach the advertising objectives effectively and then maximize reach
at that frequency level.
To
determine effective frequency, one must consider marketing factors, message factors,
and media factors.
view ads 5 sec after right
corner skip ads see next page
RELATED CONTENT
Customer satisfaction
2 gaps | customers & service providers
Business Policy | primary & secondary share market
Investment Basic Functions | IPO market
What are the customers?
product Target marketing | Market Segmentation
Media Planning and Strategy | Overview of Media Planning
Where to Promote media | Establishing Media Objectives
Where to Promote media | Establishing Media Objectives
Media Geographic Coverage | Media Scheduling
Media Fighting | Media Pulsing | Advantages| Disadvantages
Media Necessary | Level is needed | Frequency Objectives | Gross ratings
Media effects of reach and frequency | Determining Effective Reach
Media Factors important in determining frequency levels
Creative media Aspects and Mood of media
Determining Relative Costs of Media | Evaluation
No comments:
Post a Comment