Business | Publishing

Journal wars

Big publishers are tightening their grip on the lucrative science-journal market

|

WHEN American antitrust officials gave the go-ahead on May 7th to Reed Elsevier, an Anglo-Dutch publishing giant, to buy Harcourt General, an American publisher, for $4.5 billion, the relief at Reed was as palpable as the dismay among scientists. The approval of the acquisition, announced last year, tightens Reed's grip on the science-journal market at a time when publishers of such journals face not only fierce denunciation by academics, but serious efforts to undermine their business.

Worth some $10 billion, the market is hugely profitable: margins in the scientific and medical business at Reed Elsevier are around 35%, compared with an average of 20% for all of its publishing interests. If a company owns the must-read title in, say, vibrational spectroscopy, it has a nice little captive market. When combined with Harcourt, Reed Elsevier will control some 20% of the science-journal market, and add a further 500 journals to its 1,200-strong stable.

This article appeared in the Business section of the print edition under the headline “Journal wars”

The rights and wrongs of killing Tim McVeigh

From the May 12th 2001 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Business

The war for AI talent is heating up

Big tech firms scramble to fill gaps as brain drain sets in

Lessons in capitalism from Whole Foods and Trader Joe’s

How to build businesses that last


Is it better to be an early bird or a night owl?

The promise and perils of waking before sunrise