| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | AA | AB | AC | AD | AE | AF | AG | AH | AI | AJ | AK | AL | AM | AN | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ***Attn Memphis, UCF, USF, Boise State, CSU etc fans! Keep scrolling DOWN for all the spreadsheets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | THE FINE PRINT: All of these were originally compiled as INDIVIDUAL spreadsheets. Due to popular demand, I have compiled them all at one link for mass perusal. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | I tweeted these out via my account @jjfuller72 originally. https://twitter.com/jjfuller72 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | Some of the spreadsheets used a "weighting" (generally noted as a % in the top column) and then ranked within that spreadsheet at the end in a bright yellow column. There was no effort to make a cumulative ranking of all the data sheets. I feel I put a lot of effort and thought into this, but understand that many will argue various points. With hundreds of data point, it would be unheard of to not have gripes about what is included and/or how it is weighted. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | Please visit http://www.BYUtoBig12.com for a much more digestable and user-friendly representation of this data | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | "Fan Base" Ranking of BigXII Universities Including the Top-4 Discussed Expansion Candidates: BYU, Cinci, UConn, & Houston | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | INSTITUTION | Fanbase Size (2010 NYT analysis by stats/polling guru Nate Silver) 25%* | Common Census Ranking of Fan Bases (2010) 7% | “FanIndex”* 2015 Ranking 8% | Avg Football Attendance (2009)* 4% | Avg Football Attendance (2014) 8% | Average Basketball Attendance (2009) 2% | Average Basketball Attendance (2014) 4% | Undergraduate Enrollment (2014)* 12% | “Total Student Population” (2015 Forbes) 4% | Total Enrollment (USNews 2015) 4% | Estimated Total Living Alumni 8% | “Distinguished Alumni” ranking top 30 (# of distinguished alumni) 1% | “Most Powerful Alumni Network” Ranking (top 50 only) 1% | Influential Alumni Score 6% | The Alumni Factor top 227 school? 2% | Alumni CEOs of Fortune 500 Companies Ranking 2% | Social Media Ranking (top 25) 2% | Average Ranking for Fanbase, Students, Alumni Categories (weighted)* | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8 | Texas | 2250000 (1) | 8 (2) | 25 (3) | 101175 (1) | 94103 (1) | 13616 (2) | 10186 (7) | 36,072 (1) | 52,059 (1) | 51313 (1) | 474,000 (1) | 20 #553 (1) | 21 (1) | 177.5 (1) | Y (6) | NR (9) | 11 (1) | 1.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | Oklahoma | 1202000 (2) | 27 (4) | 10 (1) | 84778 (2) | 85162 (2) | 11490 (6) | 10968 (5) | 17,711 (10) | 27,292 (8) | 30628 (5) | ? (9) | NR (7) | NR (7) | 71.8 (4) | Y (6) | 29th; 2 CEOs (3) | 19 (2) | 4.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10 | BYU | 710000 (7) | 6 (1) | 50 (9) | 64236 (3) | 57141 (4) | 13383 (3) | 15875 (2) | 24,499 (4) | 31,123 (6) | 30484 (7) | 412,467 (2) | 21 #512 (2) | 44 (2) | 116.4 (2) | Y (6) | NR (9) | 24 (3) | 4.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
11 | Texas Tech | 912000 (4) | 28 (5) | 36 (5) | 50249 (7) | 58934 (3) | 9493 (9) | 7656 (11) | 25,531 (3) | 33,111 (4) | 35158 (4) | ? (9) | NR (7) | NR (7) | 33.4 (11) | Y (6) | NR (9) | NR (9) | 5.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | West Virginia | 959000 (3) | 32 (6) | 27 (4) | 57317 (4) | 56686 (5) | 10552 (7) | 8594 (9) | 20,863 (6) | 29,466 (7) | 29175 (8) | ? (9) | NR (7) | NR (7) | 50.1 (8) | N (12) | NR (9) | NR (9) | 5.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
13 | Iowa State | 535000 (9) | 43 (8) | 48 (8) | 46242 (9) | 52197 (8) | 11965 (5) | 14192 (3) | 27,199 (2) | 32,955 (5) | 34435 (5) | “over 242,194” (5) | NR (7) | NR (7) | 27.1 (14) | Y (6) | 20th; 2 CEOs (1) | NR (9) | 7.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
14 | Oklahoma State | 720000 (6) | 55 (9) | 40 (6) | 53719 (5) | 54387 (6) | 10031 (8) | 10397 (6) | 18,121 (8) | 26,073 (10) | 25854 (11) | "over 190,000” (8) | NR (7) | NR (7) | 51.9 (7) | Y (6) | NR (9) | NR (9) | 7.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15 | Kansas | 768000 (5) | 41 (7) | 69 (12) | 50581 (6) | 34077 (11) | 16350 (1) | 16437 (1) | 16,995 (12) | 26,968 (9) | 27180 (9) | ? (9) | NR (7) | NR (7) | 81.5 (3) | Y (6) | NR (9) | NR (9) | 7.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
16 | UConn | 600000 (8) | 26 (3) | 106 (14) | 38229 (10) | 27461 (14) | 12518 (4) | 10134 (8) | 17,524 (11) | 25,911 (11) | 26541 (10) | 247,000 (6) | NR (7) | NR (7) | 60.2 (6) | Y (6) | NR (9) | NR (9) | 8.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
17 | Kansas State | 428000 (10) | 59 (10) | 58 (10) | 46763 (8) | 53081 (7) | 8940 (10) | 12125 (4) | 17,956 (9) | 24,581 (12) | 24766 (12) | “nearly 300,000” (3) | NR (7) | NR (7) | 30.1 (12) | Y (6) | NR (9) | NR (9) | 8.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
18 | Cincinnati | 323000 (12) | 64 (11) | 94 (13) | 33957 (13) | 28840 (12) | 7818 (11) | 8567 (10) | 20,578 (7) | 34,379 (3) | 35421 (3) | 285,000 (4) | NR (7) | NR (7) | 35.2 (10) | N (12) | 22nd; 2 CEOs (2) | NR (9) | 9.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | Houston | 100000 (14) | 96 (14) | 59 (11) | 25242 (14) | 28311 (13) | 3814 (13) | 3783 (14) | 23,595 (5) | 39,540 (2) | 40914 (2) | “Over 200,000” (7) | NR (7) | NR (7) | 71.1 (5) | N (12) | 38th; 2 CEOs (4) | NR (9) | 10.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20 | Baylor | 210000 (13) | 76 (13) | 24 (2) | 36306 (12) | 46710 (9) | 7066 (12) | 6806 (12) | 13,577 (13) | 15,616 (13) | 16263 (13) | ? (9) | NR (7) | NR (7) | 44.3 (9) | Y (6) | NR (9) | NR (9) | 10.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
21 | TCU | 370000 (11) | 66 (12) | 44 (7) | 38187 (11) | 44719 (10) | 3612 (14) | 4955 (13) | 8,326 (14) | 9,925 (14) | 10033 (14) | ? (9) | NR (7) | NR (7) | 27.2 (13) | Y (6) | NR (9) | NR (9) | 11.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
22 | SOURCES | http://thequad.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/19/the-geography-of-college-football-fans-and-realignment-chaos/?_r=0 | http://commoncensus.org/teams.php?sport=5 | http://fanindex.usatoday.com | http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/stats/football_records/Attendance/2009.pdf | http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/stats/football_records/Attendance/2014.pdf | http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/stats/m_basketball_RB/Reports/attend/2009.pdf | http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/stats/m_basketball_RB/Reports/attend/2014.pdf | http://ope.ed.gov/athletics/GetOneInstitutionData.aspx | http://www.forbes.com/top-colleges/list/3/#tab:rank | http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/data | Couldn't find a ranking site. Figures from individual institutions during web searches | http://colleges.startclass.com/stories/5645/colleges-noteworthy-alumni#Intro | http://www.bestcollegevalues.org/top-alumni-networks/ | http://time.com/27821/us-college-rankings/ | https://www.alumnifactor.com/top-177-colleges | http://www.bestcolleges.com/features/colleges-with-highest-number-fortune-500-ceo-graduates/ | http://www.bestcolleges.com/features/best-college-social-media/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||
23 | * NOTES *Candidate schools in pink, Recent expansion additions in Orange | *Arbitrary weights put on each category based on several considerations. Extra weight given to sections with complete data sets, hard numbers (e.g. enrollment data), and actual statistical analyses of the fanbase itself. | * Poll done during CFB season (Oct) and during phases of conference realignment & seems to over-rate those teams that were “on the market” at the time. Measures were taken to avoid spam voting. | *Not a scientific poll, but given weight due to how fresh the info is. Seems to undervalue Basketball fans/schools | * Chose 2009 for comparison since overall CFB attendance has declined each year since then. http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/writer/jon-solomon/25418087/college-football-attendance-drops-for-fifth-straight-year-but-at-slower-rate | * Undergraduates are much more likely to be/become fans than graduate/ post-graduate/ professional students | ? = Couldn't find anything after searching | * Top 50 schools ranked here: https://www.alumnifactor.com/# | *This represents the weigthed rank-order place of each of the category listed in the table. Thereby represents the best estimate of "Fanbase" | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
25 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
26 | Football Program Strength in Current Big12 with BYU, Cinci, UConn, & Houston Included | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
27 | INSTITUTION | ESPN Prestige Rankings 2009 10% | Greatest Teams of All Time Per AP Poll* 4% | Best College Football Programs Top 50 (2014)* 6% | Best College Football Programs Top 50* (2010) 2% | Niche Rankings College Football Programs* 1% | Avergage 10yr Composite Computer Rating (range) 10% | Average 3yr Composite Computer Rating (range)* 5%^ | Avg Football Attendance 2009 + 2013-15 10% | Stadium Capacity 4% | National Championships ("Poll Era" 1936- ) 6% | BCS/ NY6/ Playoff Bowl Appearances 5% | Total Bowl Games 5% | Bowl Game win Percentage* 3% | Football Program Total Wins Rank (# of wins) 3% | All-time Win Percentage National Rank (Actual %) 6% | Heisman's 3% | Football All Americans 4% | Football Academic All Americans 2% | Academic All American Hall of Fame Members 1% | Football NCAA Post-Graduate Scholarship Winners 1% | Total Years on NCAA Football Probation (most recent) 2% | Total Years Banned from Bowl Participation (most recent) 2% | Average Football Recruiting Class 2014-16 [Highest Class] 5% | Weighted Football Program Ranking* | ||||||||||||||||
28 | Oklahoma | 1 (1) | 1 (1) | 2 (1) | 1 (1) | 6 (1) | 11 (3-30) [1] | 14 (3-30) [2] | 85005 (2) | 82112 (2) | 7 (1) | 10 (1) | 49 (2) | 58.% (2) | 7 (861) [2] | 5 (72%) [1] | 5 [1] | 76 [1] | 21 [2] | 3 (2 Selmons)* (1) | 9 (2) | 10 (2009) [14] | 5 (1990) [12] | 16 [14] (2) | 1.91 | ||||||||||||||||
29 | Texas | 7 (2) | 8 (2) | 8 (2) | 8 (2) | 9 (2) | 28 (2-62) [4] | 46 (28-58) [8] | 96072 (1) | 100119 (1) | 4 (2) | 4 (2) | 53 (1) | 53% (3) | 3 (886) [1] | 7 (71%) [2] | 2 [2] | 55 [2] | 29 [1] | - (9) | 8 (3) | 3 (1983) [5] | - [3] | 12 [10] (1) | 2.40 | ||||||||||||||||
30 | BYU | 25 (3) | 45 (5) | 25* (3) | 25 (3) | 65 (11) | 31 (13-52) [5] | 41 (33-52) [6] | 60283 (3) | 64045 (3) | 1 (3) | - (13) | 34 (4) | 40% (11) | 69 (555) [9] | 40 (58%) [4] | 1 [5] | 13 [5] | 15 [3] | Steve Young (3) | 15 (1) | - [1] | - [3] | 60 [50] (10) | 4.97 | ||||||||||||||||
31 | TCU | 31 (4) | 29 (3) | 26 (4) | 31 (4) | 32 (4) | 22 (2-66) [2] | 26 (4-66) [3] | 43318* (10) | 45000 (11) | 1 (4) | 3 (3) | 31 (6) | 50% (5) | 41 (627) [4] | 68 (54%) [7] | 1 [5] | 16 [4] | 11 [6] | Jim Swink (3) | 6 (5) | 3 (1988) [6] | 1 (1986) [7] | 36 [23] (4) | 5.02 | ||||||||||||||||
32 | West Virginia | 35 (5) | 43 (4) | 30 (5) | 33 (5) | 20 (3) | 32 (3-83) [6] | 50 (32-83) [9] | 55425 (6) | 60000 (7) | - (9) | 3 (3) | 34 (4) | 44% (9) | 14 (727) [3] | 28 (60%) [3] | - (11) | 11 [8] | 13 [4] | Oliver Luck (3) | 3 (8) | 2 (2012) [4] | - [3] | 37 [35] (5) | 5.67 | ||||||||||||||||
33 | Oklahoma State | 65 (9) | 52 (9) | 40 (7) | - (10) | 34 (5) | 25 (3-49) [3] | 29 (14-49) [4] | 56225 (4) | 60218 (6) | - (9) | 2 (6) | 26 (7) | 62% (1) | 65 (565) [8] | 83 (51%) [9] | 1 [5] | 18 [3] | 7 [9] | - (9) | 2 (11) | 8 (1992) [10] | 5 (1991) [14] | 37 [28] (5) | 6.43 | ||||||||||||||||
34 | Baylor | 63 (8) | 50 (8) | 48 (8) | - (10) | 59 (10) | 46 (8-98) [10] | 10 (8-13) [1] | 43781* (9) | 45140 (10) | - (9) | 2 (6) | 22 (9) | 50% (5) | 59 (581) [6] | 81 (51%) [8] | 1 [5] | 13 [5] | 10 [7] | - (9) | 3 (8) | 8 (2014) [13] | - [3] | 26 [17] (3) | 7.47 | ||||||||||||||||
35 | Texas Tech | 42 (6) | 61 (10) | 38 (6) | 47 (6) | 70 (12) | 41 (9-78) [8] | 55 (39-78) [10] | 55864 (5) | 60454 (5) | - (9) | - (13) | 37 (3) | 39% (12) | 70 (551) [10] | 53 (56%) [5] | - (11) | 12 [7] | 7 [9] | - (9) | 7 (4) | 7 (2012) [8] | 1 (1997) [8] | 40 [33] (7) | 7.48 | ||||||||||||||||
36 | Kansas State | 76 (11) | 47 (6) | - (11) | - (10) | 38 (6) | 46 (10-78) [9] | 36 (20-63) [5] | 51458 (8) | 50000 (9) | - (9) | 2 (6) | 19 (10) | 37% (13) | 88 (509) [12] | 110 (45%) [14] | - (11) | 11 [8] | 12 [5] | - (9) | 3 (8) | 8 (1980) [9] | 5 (1979) [11] | 59 [49] (8) | 9.21 | ||||||||||||||||
37 | Houston | 47 (7) | 49 (7) | - (11) | - (10) | 95 (14) | 51 (12-91) [11] | 44 (12-71) [7] | 27947 (14) | 40000 (12) | - (9) | 1 (10) | 24 (8) | 48% (8) | 112 (417) [14] | 67 (54%) [6] | 1 [5] | 7 [10] | 4 [12] | - (9) | 3 (8) | 7 (1991) [7] | 5 (1990) [13] | 69 [40] (11) | 9.67 | ||||||||||||||||
38 | Cincinnati | 82 (12) | 86 (12) | - (11) | - (10) | 45 (8) | 39 (7-76) [7] | 57 (46-67) [11] | 32916 (12) | 35000 (14) | - (9) | 2 (6) | 14 (11) | 43% (10) | 51 (595) [5] | 84 (51%) [10] | - (11) | 3 [13] | 4 [12] | - (9) | 1 (13) | 8 (2013) [12] | 2 (1988) [9] | 70 [64] (13) | 10.44 | ||||||||||||||||
39 | Kansas | 69 (10) | 63 (11) | - (11) | - (10) | 44 (7) | 79 (4-122) [14] | 106 (95-122) [14] | 37456 (11) | 50250 (8) | - (9) | 1 (10) | 12 (12) | 50% (5) | 60 (579) [7] | 99 (49%) [11] | - (11) | 5 [11] | 7 [9] | - (9) | 6 (5) | 8 (2009) [11] | 3 (1984) [10] | 70 [51] (12) | 10.62 | ||||||||||||||||
40 | Iowa State | 114 (14) | 118 (13) | - (11) | - (10) | 77 (13) | 78 (48-106) [13] | 88 (80-97) [12] | 52580* (7) | 61000 (4) | - (9) | - (13) | 12 (12) | 25% (14) | 85 (513) [11] | 108 (45%) [13] | - (11) | 4 [12] | 4 [12] | - (9) | 1 (13) | 2 (1998) [3] | - [3] | 59 [53] (9) | 10.82 | ||||||||||||||||
41 | UConn | 90 (13) | NR (14) | - (11) | - (10) | 57 (9) | 69 (33-123) [12] | 103 (85-123) [13] | 31212 (13) | 40,000 (12) | - (9) | 1 (10) | 6 (14) | 50% (5) | 93 (502) [13] | 101 (48%) [12] | - (11) | - [14] | - [14] | - (9) | 1 (13) | - [1] | - [3] | 103 [99] (14) | 11.60 | ||||||||||||||||
42 | SOURCES | http://espn.go.com/college-football/news/story?id=3836130 | http://campusinsiders.com/news/ap-college-football-rankings-the-greatest-teams-of-all-time-08-23-2015 | http://fansided.com/2014/10/18/50-greatest-college-football-programs-time-statistically-ranked/ | http://bleacherreport.com/articles/522165-power-ranking-the-top-50-college-football-programs-of-all-time | https://colleges.niche.com/rankings/best-college-football-programs/ | https://goo.gl/MFWw8a | https://goo.gl/MFWw8a | https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1W7KwigU2t73KNn2ErGuL7MFUXRpiUKW7to7p0GtyX_Q/edit?usp=sharing | http://stats.ncaa.org/rankings?sport_code=MFB&division=11 | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_football_national_championships_in_NCAA_Division_I_FBS | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bowl_Championship_Series#BCS_bowl_appearances_by_team | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NCAA_Division_I_FBS_football_bowl_records | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NCAA_Division_I_FBS_football_bowl_records | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NCAA_Division_I_FBS_football_win-loss_records | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NCAA_Division_I_FBS_football_win-loss_records | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Heisman_Trophy_winners | http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/stats/football_records/2014/awards.pdf | http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/stats/football_records/2014/awards.pdf | http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/stats/football_records/2014/awards.pdf | http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/stats/football_records/2014/awards.pdf | https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wzDDPpWw3pvc6DKdSkMsaVhLfBPOqXkctC1ba8zEHWo/edit?usp=sharing | http://www.footballgeography.com/college-football-fbs-and-ncaa-probation/ | http://www.footballgeography.com/college-football-fbs-and-ncaa-probation/ | *This represents the weigthed rank-order place of each of the categories listed in the table. | ||||||||||||||||
43 | * NOTES *Candidate schools in pink, Recent expansion additions in Orange | Very cool scoring system with plus and minus point system. Would give more weight, but it is 6+ years old already | * Since 1936 (AKA "Poll Era"). Weighted lower since the ESPN Prestige Rankings are highly based on AP Rankings | * Only P5 (+ ND) schools included but last page shows where BYU would land. Ends w/ "The numbers do not lie & history suggests the Cougars should be included w/ the 'big boys' of CFB" | * Low weighting due to ranking system not published. It's "Bleacher Report" but done by a "senior writer" | *Very odd ranking system w/ spurious results. UConn over Baylor? Valdosta State over Texas Tech? Kansas over BYU? Only schools in their top 9 were given credit for their NCs. Notre Dame & BYU w/ 0 NCs | Self compiled data at Google Spreadsheet with links to source data at Massey Ratings | * Self compiled data @ Google Spreadsheet w/ links to source data @ Massey Ratings, ^Weighted lower than 10yr data since 3 yr data is already included in the 10 yr data | *Significant stadium expansion since 2009 (undervalued figures?). See link above for details. Also, chosen since overall attendance @ CFB games has been DECLINING nationally since 2009. | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Football_Playoff | * Relatively lower weight since 3-1 in bowl games would be the same percentage rank as 30-10. | *OU is 2nd nationally in this category, trailing only Notre Dame's 4 AAA HOF members | FYI SMU holds record with 16 years of probation | SMU holds record with 9 years of bowl bans | *The assigned percentages are arbitrarily assigned based on what author feels Big12 University Presidents would value | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
44 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
45 | Basketball Program Value/Strength of BYU, Cinci, UConn, Houston Ranked Within Current Big12 Schools | (Extra weight given to sections with complete data sets, hard numbers, & others' ranking systems) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
46 | INSTITUTION* | Best 50 programs in last 50 yrs (ESPN 2012) 10% | 75 All-time Best Programs 10% | NCAA National Champions 7% | NCAA Tourney Appearances 8% | Total Wins 5% | All-time Winning Percentage 10% | 10 Year Average Composite Computer Ranking [range] 10% | 3 Year Average Composite Computer Ranking [range] 5% | Average Attendance (2014) 8% | Arena Capacity 5% | National POY (Naismith, or Wooden) 3% | 1st Team All Americans (Most Recent) 5% | Academic All- Americans (Most Recent) 2% | Average Recruiting Class Ranking 2013-15 [Highest Class] 6% | Total Years on Men's BkBall Probation (most recent) 3% | Total Years Banned from Tourney (most recent) 3% | Weighted Basketball Program Ranking* | |||||||||||||||||||||||
47 | Kansas | 2 (1) | 2 (1) | 3 (2) | 44 (1) | 2153 (1) | 72% (1) | 5 [1-11] (1) | 7 [1-11] (1) | 16437 (1) | 16300 (3) | 1 (1988) (4) | 26 (2010) (1) | 15 (2011) (1) | 5 [2] (1) | 10 (2009) (14) | 4 (1989) (13) | 2.01 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
48 | Texas | 26 (4) | 14 (4) | - (9) | 32 (2) | 1719 (3) | 63% (3) | 33 [8-103] (2) | 32 [26-37] (6) | 10186 (7) | 16734 (2) | 2 (2007) (1) | 7 (2008) (4) | 2 (2008) (7) | 32 [15] (2) | - (3) | - (5) | 3.93 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
49 | UConn | 9 (2) | 7 (2) | 4 (1) | 31 (3) | 1641 (6) | 64% (2) | 38 [4-84] (4) | 40 [6-76] (8) | 10134 (8) | 10134 (12) | - (10) | 5 (2011) (5) | 3 (2004) (4) | 38 [36] (4) | 3 (2014) (9) | - (5) | 4.54 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50 | BYU | 36 (7) | 19 (7) | - (9) | 29 (5) | 1738 (2) | 62% (5) | 34 [8-56] (3) | 46 [34-55] (9) | 15875 (2) | 19000 (1) | 2 (2011) (1) | 3 (2011) (9) | 8 (1990) (2) | 54 [18] (8) | - (3) | - (5) | 5.23 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
51 | Cincinnati | 24 (3) | 9 (3) | 2 (3) | 29 (5) | 1705 (4) | 63% (3) | 59 [18-145] (10) | 31 [19-42] (5) | 8567 (10) | 13176 (8) | 1 (2000) (4) | 8 (2002) (3) | 1 (1967) (10) | 43 [31] (6) | 9 (2000) (13) | 4 (1989) (13) | 5.77 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
52 | Oklahoma | 31 (5) | 27 (8) | - (9) | 29 (5) | 1596 (7) | 61% (7) | 56 [6-125] (8) | 17 [6-29] (3) | 10968 (5) | 11528 (10) | 1 (2009) (4) | 11 (2009) (2) | 3 (1980) (4) | 61 [48] (9) | 4 (2008) (11) | - (5) | 6.55 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
53 | West Virginia | 56 (9) | 39 (9) | - (9) | 26 (9) | 1676 (5) | 62% (5) | 40 [5-137] (5) | 33 [9-70] (7) | 8594 (9) | 14000 (6) | - (10) | 3 (1960) (9) | 4 (2009) (3) | 45 [20] (7) | 1 (1958) (7) | - (5) | 7.09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
54 | Oklahoma State | 64 (10) | 16 (5) | 2 (3) | 27 (8) | 1595 (8) | 59% (9) | 58 [27-110] (9) | 63 [31-110] (10) | 10397 (6) | 13611 (7) | - (10) | 3 (1946) (9) | 2 (1969) (7) | 33 [26] (3) | - (3) | - (5) | 7.19 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
55 | Kansas State | 38 (8) | 18 (6) | - (9) | 28 (7) | 1572 (9) | 59% (9) | 40 [6-80] (5) | 63 [48-80] (10) | 12125 (4) | 12528 (9) | - (10) | 4 (2008) (6) | 2 (1982) (7) | 63 [54] (10) | 1 (1955) (6) | - (5) | 7.38 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
56 | Iowa State | 118 (12) | - (13) | - (9) | 17 (11) | 1293 (11) | 51% (12) | 68 [13-136] (11) | 16 [13-20] (2) | 14192 (3) | 14376 (5) | - (10) | 1 (2000) (11) | 1 (1995) (10) | 74 [33] (11) | - (3) | - (5) | 9.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
57 | Houston | 35 (6) | 51 (10) | - (9) | 19 (10) | 1182 (13) | 59% (9) | 131 [58-221] (13) | 131 [58-210] (13) | 3783 (14) | 8479 (13) | - (10) | 4 (1984) (6) | - (13) | 146 [68] (14) | - (3) | - (5) | 10.56 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
58 | Baylor | 258 (14) | - (13) | - (9) | 9 (13) | 1263 (12) | 49% (13) | 41 [8-113] (7) | 22 [18-24] (4) | 6806 (12) | 10347 (11) | - (10) | - (13) | 2 (1997) (7) | 41 [22] (5) | 7 (2010) (12) | 3 (2004) (12) | 10.78 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
59 | Texas Tech | 104 (11) | 61 (11) | - (9) | 13 (12) | 1317 (10) | 55.% (11) | 114 [35-225] (12) | 90 [35-144] (12) | 7656 (11) | 15020 (4) | - (10) | 1 (2004) (11) | - (13) | 85 [72] (13) | 4 (2002) (10) | 1 (1997) (11) | 10.79 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
60 | TCU | 219 (13) | - (13) | - (9) | 7 (14) | 1147 (14) | 46% (14) | 164 [74-230] (14) | 143 [74-208] (14) | 4955 (13) | 7201 (14) | - (10) | - (13) | - (13) | 76 [39] (12) | 1 (1982) (8) | - (5) | 12.53 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
61 | SOURCES | http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/story/_/id/8298598/conference-breakdowns-50-50-rankings | http://fansided.com/2014/10/21/75-greatest-college-basketball-programs-time-statistically-ranked/ | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NCAA_Men%27s_Division_I_Basketball_champions | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NCAA_Men%27s_Division_I_Tournament_bids_by_school | http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/stats/m_basketball_RB/2016/DivI.pdf | http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/stats/m_basketball_RB/2016/DivI.pdf | https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1W7Fpg4MVVdn0rCZ55eSRqtiaOacblFhf-sv0bZwQxH0/edit?usp=sharing | https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1W7Fpg4MVVdn0rCZ55eSRqtiaOacblFhf-sv0bZwQxH0/edit?usp=sharing | http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/stats/m_basketball_RB/Reports/attend/2014.pdf | http://stats.ncaa.org/rankings?sport_code=MBB&division=1 | http://247sports.com/Season/2015-Basketball/CompositeTeamRankings | http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/stats/m_basketball_RB/2015/Awards.pdf | http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/stats/m_basketball_RB/2015/Awards.pdf | http://247sports.com/Season/2015-Basketball/CompositeTeamRankings | https://sportsdelve.wordpress.com/2011/05/31/ncaa-probation-and-division-i-college-basketball/ | https://sportsdelve.wordpress.com/2011/05/31/ncaa-probation-and-division-i-college-basketball/ | *This represents the weigthed rank-order place of each of the categories listed in the table. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
62 | * NOTES *Candidate schools in pink, Recent expansion additions in Orange | http://espn.go.com/blog/collegebasketballnation/post/_/id/63206/50-in-50-rankings-no-5-kansas | - = Not Ranked in top 75 (statistical analysis based on point system) | - | - | - | Weighted higher than Total Wins since many programs started many yrs before others. | Data personally compiled at link above | Data personally compiled at link above (weighted less than 10 yr data since this 3 yr data is already included within the 10 yr figures) | - | - | - | - | - | - | Info as of May 2011 | Info as of May 2011 | *The assigned percentages are arbitrarily assigned based on what author feels Big12 University Presidents would value | |||||||||||||||||||||||
63 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
64 | BigXII Athletic Program Strength (excluding FB/MBB) with BYU, Cinci, UConn, Houston Included | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
65 | INSTITUTION | Total Team NCAA National Championships* [sport with most NCs] 10% | Different Sports winning a NC (excluding FB/MBB) 4% | Number of Varsity Sports Sponsored (NCAA only) 3% | Total NCAA Athletes (Unduplicated) 5% | Director's Cup Points: Ten Year Average 2006-2015 8% | Director's Cup Points: Three Year Average 2013-2015* 5% | Director's Cup Ranking: Ten Year Average 2006-2015 8% | Director's Cup Ranking: Three Year Average 2013-2015* 5% | Director’s Cup Current Standings (2016) 2% | "Best in College Sports" 2015 3% | "Colleges with the Best Sports Programs" (top 26) 2% | Academic All-Americans (all sports) 4% | NCAA Walter Byers Scholars + Academic All-America Team Members of the Year 1% | Total Athletics Revenue (Millions) 10% | Athletic Dept Net Profit* (Millions) 10% | Athletics Revenue per “NCAA Finances” at USA Today (millions) 0%* | Total Subsidy^ (millions) 8% | Unsubsized Revenue* 8% | Net Profit (Rev - Exp in $Millions) for FB & M/WBB Programs 4% | Weighted Athletic Program Ranking* | ||||||||||||||||||||
66 | Texas | 43 [11MSwim] (2) | 10 (1) | 16 (5) | 563 (4) | 1024 (1) | 1039 (1) | 8 (1) | 9 (1) | 30 (4) | 26 (4) | 6 (2) | 131 (1) | - (8) | 179.6 (1) | 26.7 (1) | 161 | 0 (3) | 161 (1) | 93 (1) | 1.77 | ||||||||||||||||||||
67 | Oklahoma | 22 [9MGymn] (3) | 6 (2) | 17 (3) | 591 (3) | 827 (2) | 927 (2) | 20 (2) | 16 (2) | 42 (6) | 14 (1) | 15 (3) | 123 (2) | 1 (3) | 135.7 (2) | 10.9 (2) | 129 | 0 (3) | 129 (2) | 46 (2) | 2.34 | ||||||||||||||||||||
68 | Oklahoma State | 49 [34Wrstlg] (1) | 5 (3) | 14 (10) | 496 (8) | 629 (3) | 771 (3) | 32 (3) | 26 (3) | 27 (3) | 39 (6) | 4 (1) | 64 (8) | - (8) | 85.6 (6) | 5.4 (5) | 118 | 7.5 (11) | 110 (3) | 24 (3) | 4.43 | ||||||||||||||||||||
69 | Baylor | 3 [2WBB] (10) | 2 (9) | 15 (7) | 549 (6) | 607 (4) | 659 (4) | 34 (4) | 33 (4) | 72 (10) | 19 (3) | - (7) | 84 (7) | - (8) | 106.1 (3) | 0 (11) | 106 | 0 (3) | 106 (4) | 7 (8) | 5.98 | ||||||||||||||||||||
70 | BYU | 9 [4WXC] (8) | 4 (4) | 17 (3) | 629 (2) | 542 (5) | 514 (6) | 39 (5) | 44 (6) | 13 (1) | 40 (7) | - (7) | 90 (6) | 2 (1) | 59 (12) | 4.6 (6) | 59 | 0 (3) | 59 (11) | 5 (10) | 6.49 | ||||||||||||||||||||
71 | West Virginia | 18 [17Rifle] (4) | 2 (9) | 16 (5) | 504 (7) | 447 (6) | 342 (10) | 51 (6) | 66 (10) | 35 (5) | 32 (5) | - (7) | 95 (3) | - (8) | 87.3 (5) | 0 (11) | 77 | 4.4 (10) | 73 (8) | -1 (13) | 7.37 | ||||||||||||||||||||
72 | TCU | 3 [2Rifle] (10) | 2 (9) | 17 (3) | 553 (5) | 435 (7) | 444 (8) | 52 (7) | 55 (8) | 68 (9) | 17 (2) | - (7) | 32 (13) | - (8) | 80.6 (7) | 0 (11) | 81 | 0 (3) | 81 (6) | 7 (8) | 7.44 | ||||||||||||||||||||
73 | Kansas | 8 (3Track) (9) | 4 (4) | 14 (10) | 435 (11) | 320 (11) | 359 (9) | 64 (11) | 61 (9) | 46 (7) | 72 (12) | - (7) | 91 (5) | - (8) | 103.3 (4) | 0 (11) | 98 | 2.6 (8) | 95 (5) | 9 (7) | 8.31 | ||||||||||||||||||||
74 | Iowa State | 13 [8Wrstlg) (7) | 3 (6) | 14 (10) | 406 (13) | 430 (8) | 550 (5) | 55 (8) | 41 (5) | 50 (8) | 68 (11) | - (7) | 63 (9) | - (8) | 65.7 (11) | 0 (11) | 68 | 2 (7) | 66 (10) | 19 (4) | 8.46 | ||||||||||||||||||||
75 | UConn | 16 [10WBkB] (6) | 3 (6) | 20 (1) | 659 (1) | 349 (10) | 329 (11) | 61 (10) | 66 (10) | 18 (2) | 54 (10) | - (7) | 48 (10) | 2 (1) | 72.2 (9) | 0.1 (7) | 71 | 27.2 (14) | 44 (12) | -7 (14) | 8.67 | ||||||||||||||||||||
76 | Texas Tech | 1 [WBB] (12) | 1 (12) | 13 (12) | 423 (12) | 405 (9) | 460 (7) | 57 (9) | 49 (7) | 84 (11) | 100 (14) | - (7) | 48 (11) | - (8) | 69.9 (10) | 5.6 (4) | 77 | 4.1 (9) | 73 (7) | 17 (6) | 9.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||
77 | Kansas State | - (13) | - (13) | 12 (14) | 494 (9) | 237 (12) | 227 (12) | 86 (12) | 88 (12) | 111 (13) | 46 (8) | - (7) | 92 (4) | - (8) | 76.2 (8) | 9.8 (3) | 73 | 1.3 (6) | 72 (9) | 19 (4) | 9.15 | ||||||||||||||||||||
78 | Houston | 17 [16MGolf] (5) | 2 (9) | 13 (12) | 398 (14) | 169 (13) | 191 (13) | 108 (13) | 106 (13) | 90 (12) | 79 (13) | - (7) | 13 (14) | - (8) | 45.4 (13) | 0 (11) | 40 | 21.8 (12) | 18 (14) | 0 (11) | 11.63 | ||||||||||||||||||||
79 | Cincinnati | - (13) | - (13) | 15 (7) | 465 (10) | 112 (14) | 89 (14) | 148 (14) | 174 (14) | 111 (13) | 50 (9) | - (7) | 36 (12) | 1 (3) | 42.9 (14) | 0 (11) | 59 | 27.1 (13) | 32 (13) | 0 (11) | 12.47 | ||||||||||||||||||||
80 | SOURCES | http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/stats/champs_records_book/Overall.pdf | http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/stats/champs_records_book/Overall.pdf | http://ope.ed.gov/athletics/GetOneInstitutionData.aspx | http://ope.ed.gov/athletics/GetOneInstitutionData.aspx | https://goo.gl/gpNvtW | https://goo.gl/gpNvtW | https://goo.gl/sTmjZ1 | https://goo.gl/sTmjZ1 | http://grfx.cstv.com/photos/schools/nacda/sports/directorscup/auto_pdf/2015-16/misc_non_event/D1Jan14stand.pdf | http://www.cbssports.com/general/best-in-college-sports | http://colleges.startclass.com/stories/11106/colleges-best-sports-programs#26-University-of-California-Los-Angeles-Bruins | http://www.cosida.com/documents/2015/9/24//School_all_time_AAA_standings.pdf?id=1598 | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Byers_Scholarship | http://ope.ed.gov/athletics/GetOneInstitutionData.aspx | http://ope.ed.gov/athletics/GetOneInstitutionData.aspx | http://sports.usatoday.com/ncaa/finances/ | http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/college/2015/05/26/college-athletic-department-revenue-database-methodology/2150123/ | http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/college/2015/05/26/college-athletic-department-revenue-database-methodology/2150123/ | http://ope.ed.gov/athletics/GetOneInstitutionData.aspx | *This represents the weigthed rank-order place of each of the categories listed in the table. | ||||||||||||||||||||
81 | * NOTES *Four most oft-discussed candidate schools in pink. Recent Expansion additions to BigXII | * Excluding Football & Men's Basketball | Self Compiled data on spreadsheet from link above | * Weighted less since 3 year data is already "baked into" the 10 year data. | Self Compiled data on spreadsheet from link above | * Weighted less since 3 year data is already "baked into" the 10 year data. | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Academic_All-America_Team_Members_of_the_Year | *Weighted heavily since this is an "equalizer" between P5 & non-P5 Athletics Budgets. Also, many schools listed as "0" profit actually ran a deficit as noted in "Total Subsidy" column | * Unweighted figures presented here to calculated "Unsubsized Revenue" to the right. ^Private universitiesare not required to respond to “open-records requests”--figures used for these schools are from NCAA reporting at previous links | ^ “Total Subsidy: The sum of students fees, direct and indirect institutional support and state money.” * Private Universities don't report. | * Obtained from subratcting the subsidy from the Revenue figures in previous two columns | *The assigned percentages are arbitrarily assigned based on what author feels Big12 University Presidents would value | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
82 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
83 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
84 | ACADEMIC Rankings of BYU, Cincinnati, Houston, and UConn within Current Big XII Institutions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
85 | INSTITUTION* | Academic Ranking: (2015 US News & World Report) 15%* | Academic Ranking (2015 Forbes) 15% | Academic Ranking (2014 Forbes)* 0% | ARWU World Ranking. 15% | Medical School Ranking (Research) 4% | Business School Ranking 4% | Law School Ranking 4% | Engineering School Ranking 4% | “Best Value” top 25 1% | National Merit Finalists (2012 + 2014) 4% | 2014 Endowment size (in Millions) 6% | Research Spending 2014 Ranking ($ Millions) 7% | ACT Scores (25%-75% range … i.e. “the middle 50%”) 5% | Association of American Universities (AAU) Membership 10% | Carnegie Classification* 5% | "Median Salary After Attending"* 1% | Weighted Academic Ranking* | |||||||||||||||||||||||
86 | Texas | 52 (1) | 82 (1) | 76 | 37 (1) | NMS (10)* | 17 (1) | 15 (1) | 10 (1) | 22 (2) | 132 (4) | $25400* (1) | 34 (585) [1] | 26-32 (1) | Yes (2) | R1 (5) | $52,800 (3) | 1.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
87 | UConn | 57 (2) | 162 (3) | ? | 301-400 (6) | 60 (2) | 48 (3) | 63 (5) | 68 (3) | N (7) | 4 (14) | $313 (14) | 82 (258) [5] | 26-30 (3) | No (8) | R1 (5) | $53,900 (2) | 5.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
88 | BYU | 66 (3) | 104 (2) | 79 | 301-400 (6) | NMS (10) | 33 (2) | 34 (2) | 117 (11) | 8 (1) | 136 (3) | $1050 (8) | 214 (38) [12] | 27-31 (1) | No (8) | R2 (10) | $57,400 (1) | 5.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
89 | Kansas | 115 (8) | 268 (8) | ? | 201-300 (4) | 67 (4) | 88 (9) | 67 (7) | 90 (6) | N (7) | 58 (7) | $1800* (2) | 77 (302) [4] | 22-28 (8) | Yes (2) | R1 (5) | $44,600 (10) | 5.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
90 | Iowa State | 108 (7) | 263 (7) | ? | 151-200 (2) | NMS (10) | 63 (6) | None (12) | 43 (2) | N (7) | 80 (5) | $777 (11) | 74 (313) [3] | 21-29 (12) | Yes (2) | R1 (5) | $47,200 (7) | 5.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
91 | Oklahoma | 108 (6) | 227 (6) | ? | 401-500 (9) | 63 (3) | 63 (6) | 67 (6) | 99 (9) | N (7) | 486 (1) | $1490 (3) | 83 (255) [6] | 23-29 (6) | No (8) | R1 (5) | $46,600 (8) | 6.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
92 | Cincinnati | 140 (9) | 381 (12) | 391 | 201-300 (4) | 40 (1) | 70 (8) | 82 (8) | 81 (5) | N (7) | 71 (6) | $1200 (5) | 50 (423) [2] | 22-28 (8) | No (8) | R1 (5) | $39,400 (14) | 7.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
93 | Baylor | 72 (4) | 197 (4) | ? | NR (13) | NMS (10)* | 58 (4) | 56 (3) | 117 (11) | N (7) | 191 (2) | $1154 (7) | 257 (20) [13] | 24-30 (4) | No (8) | R2 (10) | $49,100 (4) | 7.3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
94 | TCU | 82 (5) | 210 (5) | ? | NR (13) | NMS (10) | 63 (6) | None (12) | None (14) | N (7) | 15 (11) | $1443 (4) | 346 (8) [14] | 24-30 (4) | No (8) | R2 (10) | $49,100 (4) | 8.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
95 | Houston | 187 (14) | 358 (10) | 389 | 201-300 (4) | NMS (10) | RNP* (11) | 59 (4) | 76 (4) | N (7) | 57 (8) | $790 (10) | 126 (141) [10] | 22-27 (10) | No (8) | R1 (5) | $48,300 (6) | 8.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
96 | Texas Tech | 166 (12) | 403 (13) | ? | 401-500 (9) | 83 (5) | 91 (10) | 118 (10) | 94 (7) | N (7) | 8 (13) | $1195* (6) | 119 (159) [9] | 22-27 (10) | No (8) | R1 (5) | $46,100 (9) | 9.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
97 | Oklahoma State | 149 (11) | 339 (9) | ? | 401-500 (9) | < 88th (7) | NR^ 125-475 (13) | None (12) | 140 (13) | N (7) | 55 (9) | $905 (9) | 135 (128) [11] | 22-28 (8) | No (8) | R2 (10) | $43,400 (12) | 9.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
98 | Kansas State | 146 (10) | 364 (11) | ? | 401-500 (9) | NMS (10) | NR 125-475 (13) | None (12) | 94 (7) | N (7) | 14 (12) | $474 (13) | 106 (185) [7] | "Not reported" (14) | No (8) | R1 (5) | $43,300 (13) | 9.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
99 | West Virginia | 175 (13) | 421 (14) | 443 | NR (13) | 88 (6) | RNP (11) | 94 (9) | 107 (10) | N (7) | 48 (10) | $515 (12) | 116 (164) [8] | 21-26 (12) | No (8) | R1 (5) | $43,900 (11) | 10.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100 | SOURCES | http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/data | http://www.forbes.com/top-colleges/list/ | http://www.mwcconnection.com/2015/7/22/8902567/boise-states-big-xii-resume | http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU2015.html | http://grad-schools.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-medical-schools/research-rankings?int=af3309&int=b3b50a&int=b14409 | http://grad-schools.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-business-schools/mba-rankings | https://www.usnews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-law-schools/law-rankings | http://grad-schools.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-engineering-schools/eng-rankings | http://www.forbes.com/pictures/gkjg45lg/the-best-value-colleges-/ | http://www.nationalmerit.org/annual_report.pdf | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_colleges_and_universities_in_the_United_States_by_endowment | https://ncsesdata.nsf.gov/profiles/site;jsessionid=ZfDaO4L0FqxakY5TWZhXNH1I.as2?method=rankingBySource&ds=herd | http://collegeapps.about.com/od/theact/a/big-12-conference-act-scores.htm | http://www.aau.edu/about/default.aspx?id=16710 | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_research_universities_in_the_United_States | https://collegescorecard.ed.gov | *This represents the weigthed rank-order place of each of the category listed in the table. |